Читать книгу Human Health and its Maintenance with the Aid of Medicinal Plants - Julian Barker - Страница 17
ОглавлениеPreface to Part Two
The herbal medicine that I espouse is not so much a cure for maladies as an essential aid to living well. Rather than concentrating on what is wrong, by enhancing the strongest qualities of our patients and modifying and diminishing their less helpful traits, maladies are actually less likely to put in an appearance, or if they do, their vitiating effects may be lessened and the term of convalescence shortened, with a speedier return to strength.
I would also want to make a case for herbal medicine being the repository of that aspect of Hippocratic medicine that concerns itself with what in old parlance were called the “six non–naturals”. This term may sound odd to our ears but means no more than those aspects of human life that belong to nurture rather than nature. Perhaps we should rename them the “six nurtures”. They point to areas of life where our behaviour may contribute to better health and are traditionally listed as follows:
1. Air | (fresh) the need for |
2. Sleep | enough of it and of good quality |
3. Diet | relative to season and change of place and stage of life |
4. Evacuations | to be well–ordered (everything from stools, urine and sweat to catarrh and semen) |
5. Exercise | to take enough but not too much |
6. Passions | inevitable, so neither good nor bad but to be kept in healthy balance (passion formerly meant torment more than enthusiasm) A mnemonic acronym for these nurtures might be “as deep” |
Ideas about these stroll in and out of fashion and common sense: in one era they may be treated as questions of folk remedy, while in another considered fit only for highly professionalised advice. If these questions were really so simple, they would have been answered once and for all centuries ago, so crucial are they to human health and the prevention of disease. Accordingly, these six areas of human life should form the core of good medical practice and not as an optional appendix.
What is missing from the list is a sense of urgency: the four drives (to be discussed in sections 12 and 13) are more than a list of good things to do for our health:
to sleep, to drink, to eat, to meet.
Our survival let alone our vitality depends upon them and probably in this order: without restorative sleep we will be unable to retain a disease-free life; without the first aid of water we can barely survive a day or two; although a fully grown healthy adult may be able to fast for some weeks before breaking into protein stores, the developing child needs feeding to survive and build a robust psyche to meet other psyches; mental health is based upon social health as is sexual health.
As the length in time in practice continues, I come to the half–thought conclusion that those who are easily fragilised, who may have been a little frail in childhood or those who cycle between a set of symptoms (in other words, those whose attainment of poise is difficult), are perhaps a little more likely to make old bones than those who from a young age have seemed to enjoy robust good health. If true, it is a weak bias, but one that can be fortified against by the consumption of plants as foods or medicines. Plants will, in any case, do wonders for those who suffer from chronic malaise.
I hope that the reflections and reiterations in this second part of the book will provide practical help for herbal practitioners by some focus on the theoretical assumptions we make about those who seek our help.
I have mostly employed the customary practitioner/patient relationship as a way of portraying the mediation of health, because the book is addressed primarily to therapists and it would be cumbersome to substitute for the so–called patient the more authentic notion that health comes from happiness and is also maintained in a person by exercise, diet and the maintenance of good relations with other people. All these build resilience. Although there is a very small step between helping people and knowing what is best for them, I have decided to stick with the patient as focus because all of us suffer at some point in our lives and need an ally in an hour of need.
But medicine dominates our culture in both soft and hard ways. Soft power is the friendly approach to advice that wouldn't want to step on anyone's toes while offering dietary and other advice that is said to be about “lifestyle” as if most of us are so deliberately stylistic; I hope to combat these bland assumptions. At the opposite pole, the imperialism of medical practice can express hostility and rage to anyone who questions the orthodox approach. The demon evidence is invoked to maintain ideological conformity; it is a shortcut which the Holy Inquisition might have envied. A demon by which, by a supreme irony, Galileo was forced to recant what he had experienced and fully understood. Then nonsense was orthodox and natural observation heretical. In the so–called developed world, nutrition and medicinal products are both in the hands of indoctrinate market forces. These embody the tyranny of choice and suppress the happiness of adequate plenty. Government is liberal to the patient as consumer (and as voter, which further entrenches the corruption) so that we are all free to be less poor than those who most need help, but is illiberal to any thinking about the kind of medicine that might be suitable for the individual, or to favour health education over palliative pharmacy. The failure of the campaign to regulate herbalists in Britain founders, in the end, on the doctrinal paradox that we are seen to do no harm. To regulate what might appear from a narrow pharmaceutical perspective to be a placebo practice would throw even more light on the admitted harms from pharmaceutical drugs. In fairness, ministers are accountable for public funds but their hands are also tied by doctrinal strings and are as likely to be criticised for indulgence as they are for intervention. The nanny of the so–called “nanny state” is not illiberal enough when it comes to preventing social harm: she could figure well as a model for the central figure in Hogarth's “Gin Lane”.95
In this second part, I have looked at the person as we see him or her in the clinic and how a person might be in their own environment. I have tried to sidestep a doctrinaire approach to herbal medicine while accepting that we all make distinctions between the plausible and the barely credible.
______________
95 London 1751; his satire was also aimed at the heedless affluence created by a callous free-market economy. At the time of writing, a modest proposal situating and advertising sweets to children is planned to be in place 12 years hence! A lot of harm can be done to a lot of people in 12 years.