Читать книгу Science news. Research on the kitchen table - Lim Word - Страница 5

It is intuitively clear that two identical objects are linked in some way; Further on this inner conviction layered the well-known physical formulas and principles.

Any physical body has a strictly set of levels of absorption-radiation of electromagnetic waves. The location of the energy bars is affected by the structure, shape, chemical composition, temperature, etc. In other words, the spectrum, in its entirety, is the name of the thing, the set of drawings, the code.

What will happen if, in a closed volume, two identical things are located next to each other? They will start exchanging radiation. The system will tend to come to a stable equilibrium. This is possible when the lines of the spectra of both bodies coincide.

In other words, the spectrum of the body A will tend to impose itself on the body B, and vice versa. Electromagnetic radiation is not purely informational, it has a certain power component. If the bodies A and B (at least one of them) are sufficiently plastic, they will tend to change – in the direction of maximum mutual similarity.

Here, presumably, at a macroscopic level, Pauli’s principle (prohibition) can come into force – two objects can not be (nearby, in the same system) at a single energy level. Thus, around the body A there are concentric zones in which its action on B will be destructive, or creative. The likeness of A and B depends on exactly how far apart they are separated. It is possible to determine this distance only empirically (ie, experimentally).

We will refer to the act of additional assimilation by exchanging our own radiations – Synchronization. As a result, we get two physical bodies, each of which has microparticles having their reflection, a synchronized pair, in another object. And, these particles interact by exchanging electromagnetic quanta (and, perhaps, somehow in some other way).

Here, the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (principle) comes into play. Roughly speaking, two microparticles in a relatively small region, having the same parameters, become paradoxically connected in some way. Some changes in the particle A are transmitted to the partner B, instantly, and, as the founders of quantum mechanics claim, in a non-physical way (ie, without the participation of any waves or particles). A and B are considered as a single system, even if the parts are in different parts of the universe.

It turns out, after the primary synchronization, the macroscopic bodies A and B, made up of myriads of microscopic a and b, feel each other’s changes. There are various schools of quantum mechanics, some of them try to observe the principles of the Theory of Relativity (the finiteness of the speed of light). But it seems that we have a communication system in which the signals are transmitted many times higher than the “constant” C (300 000 km s).

In the first experiments, I used two identical containers A and B. In the first I put a simple small addition – a figure of a triangle, a square, a pentagon … In both tanks I poured a hot solution of hyposulfite, placed them side by side in a thermally insulated box, and waited for the crystals to show. The solidifying solution is the desired plastic body, sensitive to internal and external influences.

In many cases, the crystals actually appeared on the surface of the solution, formed a kind of label. But, with each time such experiments were reproduced worse and worse, coming to naught usually, to the fourth repetition. This is not quite what modern science requires – experience must be reproduced every time, with accurate reproduction of all conditions, in any laboratory in the world. And of course, the article on such tests is quite serious publications will not take. In the end, the material – just to have something in print – was published in the journal “Young Technician”, 2013, No. 5, under the heading “Mad Ideas”.

Strange experiments

“We are used to the fact that only living organisms have the ability to learn. But can such a property boast chemical compounds? Our long-time author … believes that it is possible and such. That they seem to confirm the experiments they have set.

Take two identical containers – for example, plates or photocells, if any. Mix the alabaster on the solution of hyposulfite (photophyxis). The resultant slowly set the mixture in the same portions on plates. Then put on the surface of one of the plates a mark – carved from plastic or wood triangle. Place the tanks at a distance of one meter from each other, and to protect against external influences, you can cover them with something, for example, with the same plates.

As the mixture solidifies, fine white crystallites of hyposulfite appear on its surface. In this case, the hyposulfite crystals in the second plate formed, as the author claims, the contours of the triangle, copying the triangular spots that appeared in the first form around the real triangle.

“Three experiments in a row showed approximately one result,” the author emphasizes.

Then he conducted the following experiment. Instead of a triangle, a rectangle was placed in the transmitter form (A). The mixtures, as before, crystallized. But on their surface formed white spots, which have nothing to do with either the triangle or the rectangle! All subsequent attempts to get the previous result failed. Neither the triangle nor the rectangle in any way wanted to broadcast information about itself in the form-receiver (B).

The author postponed the experiments and returned to them only a week later. And the incredible happened! The previous results were almost completely restored! Three experiences – three good luck. Three times in the receiver, a ghost of a rectangle’s mark appeared more or less clearly … Then again the formless whitish spots began to appear.

Such an effect is explained by the author by a special M-field, which introduces the course of natural processes in similar objects to one another in a certain direction.

About this “morphogenetic field” the author read in the book of the British scientist Rupert Sheldrake “The New Science of Life.” In it, the English professor claims that the biological forms that existed before, nevertheless, affect similar forms (that is, living beings) and at the present time.