Читать книгу Covert Military Strategy The Theory Of War - Perry JD Ritthaler - Страница 7

Thank you for taking your valuable time to read this article written on the theory of war.

Who kills on the battlefield fighting war and terrorism? Perhaps a better question to ask is; why do these wars and terrorist activities take place on the battlefield in the world.

Do you think the terrorist is a rich man’s pawn or is the military fighting the war on terrorism the rich man’s pawn? The spread of democracy is a noble cause however when the moral conviction of the leader or terrorist organization is unscrupulous many issues come into play.

For example when a political leader condones the act of a drone strike that murders a person rather than a capture resulting in a trial; that action taken also results in collateral damage and killing of more innocent people; the activities self-perpetuate the acts of terrorism and more killing created on the battlefield. This is big money created by murder because the big banks and corporations that sell the weapons and drive up mineral resources prices are partially based on turmoil in the environment that allows them to cash out in stock market investment; well I want to say scams however it appears they can bend the rules to make the money creation appear legal. The same corporations or affiliate that mutually financially benefits creates the operations designed to lobby the politician that cast the order to murder through drone attacks or by covertly shaping foreign policy casting fear into a nations mind with claims of “that nation has a weapon of mass destruction or they may be thinking of building a weapon of mass destruction.” (So let’s sanction the easy targets and create more desperation and turmoil in a region and environment designed to promote terrorism; so we can use this terrorism through retaliation to spread our rotted democracy agenda covering the intentions of big money making through corporate invasion schemes.)

This is much like a mob boss asking his henchman to murder a apposing company so he can make a profit when the market price soars due to that company’s inability to hit manufacturing targets and left in finacial turmoil unable to produce the products as quickly; hence creating a higher product price demand for the product the mob boss retails.

The biggest difference is the mob boss makes a fraction of what this political corporate con created using our unethical or immoral democracy as a weapon. Do you think the politician is so dumb they do not know this violation of democracy ethics and morals is a criminal act? Or do you think the politicians are so smart they use this issue to hide the criminal operation. This brings us to the question of how do morals and ethics shape the target killings committing murder for profit manufacturing the death of woman and children on a battlefield?

So who killed the terrorist and collateral damage people involved in the drone strike and why? In retaliation who do you think killed the people targeted by the IED or suicide bomber launched to fight back against the drone strike that killed their leader and why? Could the terrorist group be financially targeted like the Politian is lobbied by corporations? Who passed the law to treat the corporation like a person allowing this criminal activity to flourish and who asked the Supreme Court to consider the law change in the democracy? So let me guess if you make the Supreme Court an accomplice to the criminal acts and human rights violation why would you ever see a politician brought to trial?

Before you hate the banker; do you think the banker is a pawn for the ultimate rich that hire fire board members if profit margins are not increased every year? What happens if guilty by association the ethics and morals of the ultimate rich are tarnished further? For example if the ultimate rich watch the leader of free world; a sitting President, launch a drone strike killing of a civilian or freedom fighter and not be taken to trial for the orchestration of murder for corporate profit; that played a role in his election through six pack funding; will that action play a role in establishing ethical and moral guideline for the ultimate rich? Is this the reason for the USA super power demise? Let me guess those politically in charge will be the new ultimate rich long gone when the country falls. This really opens the door to being a creative criminal; right or wrong?

How could disgrace of a political leadership action get started; what roots are rotting the Western democracy used as a weapon verses a tool to build freedom, peace opportunity or prosperity designed to increase manufacturing and tourism potentials of a nation. Do you think the invasion of Iraq or the creation of the 911 attacks in New York played a role in starting this corruption of ethics and morals violations in a nation’s democracy leadership agenda and fall from super power status or demise of country credit rating?

Before you hate the ultimate rich being manipulated by offshore corporations that engineered this agenda; controlled by governments looking to take the role of being the global super power through enhanced manufacturing capabilities; that actually take the manufacturing away on the USA or West; using ethics and moral issues as weapons against the Western world created by the synergy of spreading a rotted democracy design; to enhance their super power status while the politicians and corporations fill their pockets on the backs of the taxpayer. Hold it are you thinking that if a country spreads a lack of ethics and morals in their political foreign policy agenda that nation is susceptible to self-demise created by their own momentum and energies to grow their super power status agenda. Is this like a check mate move for China?

Be careful how you think because if that were the case those same corporations and ultimate rich would be looking for more ways to spike global profits through expanded covert criminal activities. Who could these people covertly murder similar to the war on terrorism agenda and how could the war on terror be expanded by this next corporate operation? After all the highest profits in economics are created when innocent human beings are targeted and murdered; without this conflict huge corporate profits would be much harder to attain. When you do an analysis like most people they follow on a path similar to water; moving toward the path of least resistance. However with rotted morals and ethics in the political leadership arena; used for creating murder for profit; who do you think is the next target and why?

These people usually like to kill people with weapons less superior to their weapons; or just butcher and murder people that have no weapons. So who fits the corporate parasite pattern for the growth of this type of political corporate leadership agenda? For example who will a company like “Morgan Stanley investment bankers” make the biggest profits on in 2012? Let me guess they will go after the food supply on the planet and create a series of corporate moves that drive up food prices that create thousands of deaths in starvation. This is a very unethical move however with enhanced poverty and lack of food even more desperation is created in the African environment and you guessed it more terrorism will be easier to create.

So now you have two unethical operations led by the politicians and ultimate rich in order to create giant profit margins taking even more money out of the hands of poor or middle class and rich. The payoff is the increase in terrorism affiliated with these operations in Africa; where enhanced violence and terrorism is needed to stimulate corporate invasion to steal that countries mineral resources. Hence getting rid of Omar Kaddafi; the old genius leader with ethics and morals that led Libya into a higher lifestyle than Saudi Arabia or Russia or the USA; so why did France attack Libya and why are they attacking the rebels in Mali when they back the rebels in Syria? What happens when you lead a terrorist organization to think they can invade to run a region in order to protect their morals and ethics and way of life? Is the rotted democracy a big enough weapon to self-perpetuate the terrorism desire to attack to lead? What if foreign policy combined with starvation is the subversive weapon used to move them into battle. After all the terrorist fits the mold….weapons of less superior power and the ability to launch more terrorism globally to further self-perpetuate the corporate political criminal finacial agenda.

What happens when the politicians that lead the free world are criminals doing crimes so complicated most people are unable to see the truth or validity behind their operations? Your rights are shaped covertly and thousands die and no one is charged and taken to trial. What would happen if these people political criminals were in charge of the United Nations and Security Council? Could they commit mass genocide for corporate profits as opposed to land invasion; and actually create a more ingenious operation surpassing Hitler’s invasion of Europe. However in the bigger picture are these corporate giants backing these politicians today any different than the corporations that backed Hitler? Other than stealing the country they steal the mineral resources; however are less people murdered during this type of invasion?

Ok so your right; if these criminals controlled the Security Council and the United Nations could they be taken before the World Court for war crimes created on humanity? Or is this just an ethics and moral mistake created by the political leaders of the world backed by corporations and big banks controlled by the ultimate rich? How do you get this criminal operation to work without backroom deals created by these political leaders controlled by offshore corporation owned by the ultimate rich; controlling the Security Council and United Nations, and if you could do this big a criminal operation what is the deal made and who is paid off in the backroom, and how and what makes you think they can be brought to trial? Perhaps if we create a global internet police used to control the civilian internet designed to keep the people being fleeced and sacrificed down; that same global police network could be responsible for bringing this giant criminal cartel to justice. So keep going you political and corporate criminals because eventually you will fall just like Napoleon and Hitler and Mussolini or Cesar.

Thank you for taking your valuable time to read this article written on the theory of war shaped by ethics and morals.