Читать книгу The Hodgkiss Mysteries Volume 11 - Peter Sinclair - Страница 6

It has been no easy task to assemble material in order to reconstruct these accounts of the extraordinary contributions which Edgar Hodgkiss made to criminal detection over the years in which he was active in the field.

Hodgkiss himself kept no records.

When he suggested solutions to investigations being undertaken by his son-in-law, Detective Sergeant Donald Burke, Hodgkiss was convinced that he was merely stating the obvious and that his contributions were unremarkable and not worthy of record.

However, this presumption that he was ‘merely stating the obvious’ was frequently the cause of acrimony between himself and Sergeant Burke who resented the implied slur on his own powers of observation.

Fortunately for readers of these reports (and for posterity), Hodgkiss’s daughter, Esme, kept detailed records in a series of exercise books which she has kindly made available to those of us interested in researching and recording the contributions made by this unique character.

Jan Campbell-Jones, the General Manager of Kanundda Council during this testing period of its history, also kindly consented to assist by releasing relevant documents from her personal files and from council’s own official records system. Ms Campbell-Jones also graciously agreed to be interviewed and has given accounts of many of these extraordinary events from her point of view, relying on her remarkable powers of recall to provide in some cases verbatim accounts of significant conversations. In addition she has allowed us access to the many emails that passed between Hodgkiss and herself. Hodgkiss, of course, had deleted these emails from his laptop within days, or in some instances, within hours of transmission.

I am indebted also to the many members of community organisations who supported Edgar Hodgkiss in his various campaigns against what he saw as the deficiencies of Kanundda Council and who have helped me verify many important details.

Readers of these records should note that they do not appear in chronological order therefore minor temporal inconsistencies may appear.

Many incidents in which Hodgkiss played an important role have not yet been committed to paper and many others, unfortunately, will never appear on the public record.

On occasions both the innocent and the guilty must be protected.

Peter Sinclair,

Lillimoor, 2011