Читать книгу Human Motion Capture and Identification for Assistive Systems Design in Rehabilitation - Pubudu N. Pathirana - Страница 28

In the past few decades, a number of approaches have been proposed for assessing upper extremities, the majority of which are questionnaire‐based. For musculoskeletal movement disorders of the extremities, most scales are generic. For instance, the self‐reported Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) instrument [226], Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire [344] and self‐administered measure of disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand [148] were developed, but few of them are condition specific. More examples can be found in Adam et al. [99]. However, for neurological movement disorders, assessments are more disease‐specific and rarely focus on upper extremities. For instance, Chedokee‐McMaster (CM) assessment, the Fugl‐Meyer (FM) assessment and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) assessment are for stroke. The Fahn‐Marsden rating scale (F‐M) [58], the Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) [12], the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) [11] and so on [22] were developed for dystonia. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ‐39) [284] and its shorter version (PDQ‐8) [159], as well as the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life (PDQL) questionnaire [144], the Webster [375] and the Unified Parkinsonâs Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) [227] were developed for Parkinson's disease. More relevant to our work, Lane et al. [192] developed the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) to assess patients with dyskinesia. In this scale, the amplitude of involuntary movements was taken into consideration. In addition, Goetz et al. [119] proposed to use the Objective Dyskinesia Rating Scale (also known as the Rush Dyskinesia scale) to assess the severity of dyskinesia.