The Yard of Wit
Описание книги
Literary composition is more than an intellectual affair. Poetry has long been said to spring from the heart, while aspiring writers are frequently encouraged to write «from the gut.» Still another formulation likens the poetic imagination to the pregnant womb, in spite of the fact that most poets historically have been male. Offering a rather different set of arguments about the forces that shape creativity, Raymond Stephanson examines how male writers of the Enlightenment imagined the origins, nature, and structures of their own creative impulses as residing in their virility. For Stephanson, the links between male writing, the social contexts of masculinity, and the male body—particularly the genitalia—played a significant role in the self-fashioning of several generations of male authors. Positioning sexuality as a volatile mechanism in the development of creative energy, The Yard of Wit explains why male writers associated their authorial work—both the internal site of creativity and its status in public—with their genitalia and reproductive and erotic acts, and how these gestures functioned in the new marketplace of letters. Using the figure and writings of Alexander Pope as a touchstone, Stephanson offers an inspired reading of an important historical convergence, a double commodification of male creativity and of masculinity as the sexualized male body. In considering how literary discourses about male creativity are linked to larger cultural formations, this elegant, enlightening book offers new insight into sex and gender, maleness and masculinity, and the intricate relationship between the male body and mind.
Отрывок из книги
The Yard of Wit
Male Creativity and Sexuality, 1650–1750
.....
John Armstrong’s The Oeconomy of Love (1736) is a perfect example of a non-pornographic treatise in which “the tumid Wonder”68 represents not a static emblem of symbolic power, but the variable phases of maleness from sexual maturation and the growth of pubic hair, to the teenager’s first wet dreams and intercourse, to the dangers of masturbation, and finally to the sexual frustrations of old age, impotence, and the attempt by “Flagellation, and the rage of Blows, / To rouse the Venus loitering in his Veins!” (54, 11. 528–9)—or, in a last desperate attempt to stimulate an erection, the use of aphrodisiacs such as “Orchis,” “Satyrion” (a member of the orchid family), “Eryngo” (candied sea holly), “Cantharides” (Spanish flies) (55, 11. 550–5). The figure of the aged male has received little study for this period, except for passing reference to satirical versions of the impotent or cuckolded fumbler. And yet the story is a more complex one, as Armstrong’s treatment suggests, and the temporal realities of the yard included sometimes moving and nostalgic accounts of desires which have outlived the aging body’s ability, as in Robert Herrick’s “To His Mistresses”:
Old I am, and cannot do
.....