Читать книгу Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis - Robert E. Blankenship - Страница 54

3.12 Early formulations of the Z scheme for photosynthesis

Оглавление

All these experiments (and some others not discussed here) suddenly crystallized into a consistent formulation for photosynthesis about 1960. Robin Hill and Fay Bendall published a short paper in Nature in 1960 outlining the concept of two sequential photochemical systems arranged in tandem, so that the products of one system became the substrates of the other system (Hill and Bendall, 1960). Their formulation was based primarily on the observation that the redox potentials for two cytochromes found in chloroplasts were intermediate between the potentials of both the reductant (H2O) and the oxidant (NADP+) involved in photosynthesis. In order for them to be participants in the light‐driven electron flow, it was necessary to propose two photochemical processes and an energetically downhill intermediate step. Their original scheme is shown in Fig. 3.6. It has come to be known as the Z (for zigzag) scheme of photosynthesis (Govindjee and Björn, 2017).

Figure 3.6 Hill and Bendall's (1960) original formulation of the Z scheme for photosynthesis. Modern Z schemes are plotted with the y‐axis reversed in sign, so that more reducing species are at the top of the diagram and more oxidizing species are at the bottom. The action of light is shown as a vertical arrow in which a relatively highly oxidizing species is converted to a highly reducing one by the action of light.

Source: Hill and Bendall (1960) (p. 137)/Springer Nature.

The slightly later publication by Duysens and coworkers provided the crucial experimental evidence for this proposal, in the form of the antagonistic effects described above. One photochemical reaction, now known as Photosystem II, oxidizes water and reduces cytochrome f, while the other, now known as Photosystem I, oxidizes cytochrome f and reduces NADP+ (Duysens et al., 1961; Duysens, 1989).

The puzzling results of the red drop and enhancement effects are easily explained by this formulation of two photochemical reactions connected in series, if the absorption spectra of the pigments that feed energy to them are not quite the same. The shorter‐wavelength chlorophylls (and the phycobilisome antennas in those organisms that contain them) preferentially drive Photosystem II, whereas the longer‐wavelength pigments preferentially drive Photosystem I. Optimum rates of photosynthesis are observed when both short and long wavelengths are present, as found in the enhancement experiments. The light absorbed by the long‐wavelength pigments does not have enough energy to drive Photosystem II, so the entire system grinds to a halt if only far‐red light is used, thus explaining the red drop phenomenon. In retrospect, it was fortunate that the two photosystems had somewhat different wavelength optima, as the key early experiments demonstrating their existence all relied on preferential excitation of one or the other photosystem by carefully selecting the illumination regime.

The series formulation for oxygen‐evolving photosynthesis has been tested and questioned many times since 1960 and has withstood all challenges. There is now no doubt that this basic framework for photosynthetic electron flow in oxygen‐evolving organisms is correct. As we will see in later chapters, the two photosystems have been separated, biochemically purified, and their structures determined. The proteins that make them up to have been identified, and the genes that code for them identified and sequenced. While many questions remain about how the two photosystems interact and how both energy input to them from the antennas and electron flow between them is regulated, the Z scheme is an essential feature of the modern understanding of photosynthesis.

Of course, there are some types of photosynthetic organisms that contain chlorophyll‐like pigments and exhibit light‐dependent growth, but do not evolve oxygen. We encountered them earlier in our discussion of the van Niel formulation for the redox nature of photosynthesis. These anoxygenic (non‐oxygen evolving) photosynthetic organisms do not display any of the enhancement or red drop effects described above that led to the discovery of two photosystems in oxygen‐evolving organisms, which suggests that they contain only a single type of photosystem. Biochemical and genetic studies confirm that these organisms, which are all bacteria, indeed contain only a single type of photosystem. These simpler photosynthetic organisms have been essential for learning about the basic chemical mechanisms of photosynthesis. These organisms are discussed in detail in Chapter 6. They also provide clues to how the complex two‐photosystem version of photosynthesis found in more advanced organisms may have arisen and evolved. This is discussed in Chapter 12.

Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis

Подняться наверх