Читать книгу Ecological Studies of the Timber Wolf in Northeastern Minnesota - Robert R. Ream - Страница 10
FOOTNOTES:
Оглавление[3] Because wolf packs sometimes split temporarily, these figures may not strictly represent actual pack sizes; nevertheless they should provide reasonably accurate approximations.
[4] From Stenlund (1955).
Table 2.—Background information on five radiotagged wolves studied in northeastern Minnesota
Wolf | Estimated weight[5] (pounds) | Usual associations | Location captured | Date captured | Last date located | Days located | General condition | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Sex | |||||||
Number | ||||||||
1051 | M | 75 | None[6] | T62N-R7W-S18 | Nov. 27/68 | Apr. 24/69 | 84 | Good, but two toes frozen in trap; animal limped lightly for 5–6 wks. |
1053 | F | 60 | None | T62N-R8W-S13 | Dec. 10/68 | Aug. 29/69 | 72 | Thin; top of foot cut in trap but no broken bones or frozen toes; limped for at least 10 wks. |
1055 | F | 60 | Another wolf intermittently | T61N-R10W-S26 | Jan. ⅚9 | May 30/69 | 65 | Thin; two toes lightly frozen; no limp ever noticed. |
1057 | F | 60 | Pack of 13[7] | T66N-R5W-S33 | Jan. 8/69 | Apr. 24/69 | 47 | Thin; front foot frozen in trap; lost use of foot and could not stay with pack. |
1059 | F | 65 | Pack of 5 | T62N-R11W-S26 | Jan. 22/69 | Aug. 29/69 | 51 | Good but thin; captured in snare; no apparent injury. |