Читать книгу Nursing and Health Interventions - Souraya Sidani - Страница 93

As described by Bartholomew et al. (2016) and Kok et al. (2016), and implemented by numerous researchers, the first step of intervention mapping involves:

 Identification of the health problem or behavior in need of remediation, that is, clarification of what needs to be changed and for whom.

 Search for theoretical and empirical evidence to gain an understanding of the problem or behavior and its determinants. Determinants are reasons or causes of the problem or (non)engagement in the behavior, commonly occurring at the individual client (e.g. cognitions, emotions, beliefs) or context (e.g. social norms) levels. Different types of reviews have been conducted such as rapid reviews (e.g. Baker et al., 2018), systematic reviews (e.g. Brendryen et al., 2013), scoping reviews (e.g. Dalager et al., 2019), and narrative reviews (e.g. Athilingam et al., 2018; Beck et al., 2018; Besharati et al., 2017).

 Integration of theoretical and empirical evidence into a comprehensive list of factors contributing to the problem or behavior.

 Engagement of stakeholder groups (e.g. clients, community leaders, health professionals) in events or activities aimed to explore the relevance of the determinants, identified from the literature, to the target client population and context. A range of activities have been used including: individual interviews with stakeholders (e.g. Baker et al., 2018; Beck et al., 2018), focus group discussions (e.g. Ammendolia et al., 2016; Besharati et al., 2017), roundtable meetings, workshops or nominal group techniques (e.g. Johnson et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2019), to review the determinants for their relevance and/or to prioritize the determinants that should be addressed when designing the intervention.

 Refinement of the theory or logic model of the problem so that it reflects the problem and its determinants, as experienced by the target client population.