Читать книгу Studies in Irish History, 1603-1649 - Various - Страница 6

Notes

Оглавление

Table of Contents

1. Tract by Sir Thomas Smith on the Colonisation of Ards, in Co. Down, 1572.

2. Patent Rolls, 1 James I., lxx., 22, Dorso, p. 5.

3. See The Broken Sword of Ulster, by R. Cuninghame.

4. State Papers, Ireland (1609), p. 330, (1608), pp. 108, 109.

5. Plowden’s History, I., p. 341.

6. Calendar State Papers, Ireland (1608–10), Preface.

7. Broken Sword of Ulster, p. 153, &c. For the earlier plots of Mountjoy against Tyrone, see Docwra’s Narrative, Celtic Society’s Miscellany, Notes, p. 315.

8. State Papers, Ireland (1608), p. 31.

9. State Papers, Ireland (1608), Preface, p. xli.

10. Celtic Society’s Miscellany, Docwra’s Narrative, Notes, p. 315.

11. Carew Papers, “Discourse for the Reformation of Ireland” (1583). See also Sir J. Perrott’s Proposals, same vol., II., p. 368; II., p. 415.

12. Hill, Plantation of Ulster, p. 222.

13. State Papers, Ireland (1607) Preface, p. lvii.

14. Enrolled Patent Rolls, 16 James I., pp. 419, 420.

15. History, Vol. II., p. 14.

16. Broken Sword of Ulster, pp. 153, 168.

17. P. 313. Note.

18. Broken Sword of Ulster, p. 179.

19. MacNevin (Confiscation of Ulster, p. 137, note) says the Irish had to pay £10 13s. 4d. for 60 acres. He does not state how he gets at this fact. The grants to the natives seem to have been at the rate of £1 1s. 4d. for 100 acres, which would work out at £10 13s. 4d. for 1,000. (See Patent Rolls, James I., passim.)

20. Rev. George Hill, Montgomery MS., p. 55, note. Patent Rolls, 14 James I., lxiii., 4, Dorso, and 15 James I., xll., 3, Dorso.

21. Patent Rolls, Ireland, 19 James I., Part II., xvii., 41.

22. State Papers, Ireland (1609), p. 196.

23. Hill, Plantation of Ulster, pp. 220, 223.

24. Hill, Plantation Papers, p. 77.

25. Plantation Papers, p. 77.

26. Carew Papers, p. 228.

27. Plantation Papers, pp. 13, 14.

28. Hill, Plantation of Ulster. See Sir J. Davies’ letter to Salisbury, 27th June, 1609, about Sir Neale. When the jury were found to be favourable to him they were dismissed by a trick. Davies recommends to have him tried by a jury in Middlesex, or kept till the colonies of English or Scotch may be planted in Tyrconnell.

29. Patent Rolls, II James I.; 5 lv., 31, p. 250. 14, March 10th. See pp. 257, 293. Carew MS., pp. 49, 88; State Papers, Ireland (1609), pp. 264, 299; (1610), p. 416.

30. State Papers (1610), pp. 502, 503.

31. Plantation Papers, p. 96.

32. Patent Rolls, 20 James I., Part III., lxii., 27 Dorso.

33. Plantation Papers, p. 29. An early and unsuccessful attempt to plant had been made on Sir Oghie O’Hanlon’s land in 1569; it had been taken from him and given to Captain Chatterton. Chatterton was killed, and as nobody would venture to plant the land, it was restored to O’Hanlon. An interesting proclamation of Carew’s in 1603, on the subject of the rate of wages in the North of Ireland, is given in Plantation Papers, p. 79.

34. Patent Rolls, 12 James I., I., viii., 2. Lady O’Dogherty was about to proceed to London in pursuit of relief, and as Chichester found that her marriage money had never been paid by her brother, Lord Gormanstown, he got the king to give her £40 a year during pleasure out of the rents of Inishowen. State Papers (1609), p. 216. Patent Rolls, 14 James I., lxxxii., 14 Dorso, Part I., and 14 James I., vi., 8, Part 2, Facie.

35. Patent Rolls, James I., pp. 48, 443. Plantation Papers, pp. 19, 190, 119.

36. Patent Rolls, James I., pp. 312, 314. Plantation Papers, pp. 19, 119, 190.

37. Reid, Presbyterianism in Ulster, I., pp. 103, 104.

38. Prendergast, Ireland from the Restoration to the Revolution (1660–1690), p. 98.

39. Hill, Plantation Papers, p. 67, ff.

40. Plantation Papers, pp. 26, 189.

41. See Patent Rolls, passim; Carew Papers, p. 227; Plantation Papers, p. 52.

42. Sir R. Cox, History, II., p. 29. Plantation Papers, p. 64.

43. Patent Rolls, 14 James I., Part I., cvi., 27 Dorso.

44. Plantation Papers, p. 146.

45. See Patent Rolls, James I., pp. 492, 512, 532, &c.

46. Patent Rolls, James I., pp. 455, 473.

47. Patent Rolls, 11 James I., 5, cv., 17 Dorso; 18 James I., lxxxvii., 37 Dorso; pp. 314, 555. 22 James I., cxiv., 47 Dorso. State Papers (1610), pp. 31, 64, 391. See also the Inquiry into the state of Dioceses of Cashel and Emly and Waterford and Lismore in the State Papers. Patent Rolls, 18 James I., xxxiv., 6 Dorso.

48. Sir R. Cox’s History; Plowden; and the report of Commission mentioned below and printed in the Patent Rolls. The fullest account is by Cox, where the Acts of the Parliament and the King’s letter to the remonstrant Lords are described.

49. Patent Rolls, 16 James I., pp. 369–401.

50. Camden’s Ireland, pp. 123, 125.

51. Patent Rolls, 11 James I., lxv., 36 Facie. Carew Papers, p. 147.

52. Patent Rolls, 10 James I., 1, v. 7 Facie. 20 James I., xlii., 11 Dorso. See Lewis’s Topographical Dictionary of Ireland.

53. Patent Rolls, James I., p. 236.

54. Patent Rolls, 16 James I., xv., Dorso. State Papers, Ireland (1608), 10, Preface, p. xi.

55. While these people were coming over from Belgium, it is of interest to note that as well as at Louvain, there was an Irish College at Tournai in 1607. State Papers (1607), p. 230.

STRAFFORD

PART I

THE GRACES

By PHILIP WILSON

Strafford

Studies in Irish History, 1603-1649

Подняться наверх