Читать книгу Orthodontic Treatment of Impacted Teeth - Adrian Becker - Страница 67

The first, simplest and most informative radiograph is the periapical view. This view is oriented to pass through the minimum of surrounding tissue, in order to give accuracy and quality of resolution. There are two techniques to review: the paralleling technique and the bisecting technique. In the paralleling technique, the receptor, which is a sensor or phosphor storage plate (PSP), is placed as close to the tooth as possible, but parallel to its long axis, with the X‐ray beam directed perpendicular to it. In areas where the parallel technique is impossible due to poor access, the bisecting angle technique is used, in which the receptor is placed as close to the tooth as possible, but not parallel to its long axis. The X‐ray beam is aimed perpendicular to an imaginary plane, which bisects the angle between the long axis of an erupted tooth and the plane of the receptor, thus ensuring a minimum of distortion. The periapical radiograph is designed to view the tooth itself from the angle of best advantage, unrelated to its position in space.

From the periapical view, it will be immediately obvious if there is an impacted tooth and if its stage of development is similar to that of its erupted antimere, with at least two‐thirds of its root length. The presence and size of a follicle will be obvious and crown or root resorption, root pattern and integrity will be possible to ascertain. The presence and description of hard tissue obstruction will be evident, allowing the observer to distinguish connate, incisiform and barrel‐shaped supernumeraries, as well as odontomes of the complex or compound composite type. Similarly, this view will show soft tissue lesions, such as cysts. The great clarity that the view offers is superior to other views and should always be used as the initial radiograph of a suspected impacted tooth in a radiographic examination. The periapical view is two‐dimensional, and thus can give no information in the bucco‐lingual plane. Overlapping structures cannot be differentiated on a single radiograph as to which is lingual and which buccal.

For this radiograph to give the most advantageous view of the teeth in the maxillary arch and in the mandibular anterior segment, the central ray of the periapical view must be oblique and vary between 20° and 55° to the occlusal plane [3] (depending on the region to be X‐rayed), while attempting to be as true to the paralleling technique as possible. Given this oblique direction, any attempt to estimate the height of an impacted tooth or its bucco‐lingual location, without additional information, must fail.

When performing periapical radiography on the posterior teeth in the mandibular arch, however, the most advantageous direction has the central ray very close to the horizontal and, as such, also offers a true lateral view of these teeth. Thus, except for the bucco‐lingual situation details, the observer will see the most precise detail of the tooth and its surrounding tissues; it will also be possible to accurately assess its height in the jaw.