Читать книгу Wounded Leaders: How Their Damaged Past Affects Your Future - Allan Bonner - Страница 4

It’s always tempting to reveal some insight, or gossip, about the difficulties and joys of research and writing. I try to reserve the joy for myself and delegate the difficulties to others. But, more seriously, the others deserve thanks.

I’ve always found the thanks to wives in introductions a little pro forma. I’d like to rise above that. The best way I can describe Lorna Jackson’s input is as a professional writer, broadcaster, researcher and reader. Lorna began her career as a researcher for the landmark CBC TV shows “Marketplace” and “Take 30”. I benefit from her skills most days as she sends me links to things I’m studying or writing about. In this case, she suggested using the image of St. Sebastian to symbolize the wounded leader. She also read several drafts of my Doctoral thesis on which this book is based and then read this draft several times. Lorna’s quiet input and encouragement takes her away from her own projects and I’m grateful.

My boys, grown men now, have made sacrifices and contributions too. I interrupted many vacations with work. They saw many kitchen and dining room tables strewn with papers. But then the tables turned. Both Michael and Christian began carving out their own areas of interest and were able to add something new to mine. Michael’s knowledge of languages and history and Christian’s of music, popular culture and mythology have enriched my understanding. Michael has helped me parse words by knowing their roots and manifestations in other languages, and Christian added the concept of the “wounded king”. I am enjoying speaking with both as men now.

I lucked out with a great supervisor for my Doctorate-Dr. Roy Damary, Oxonian, Harvardian, lay preacher and entrepreneur. Roy is the author of an economic newsletter that warns of trouble years before it happens and has become a great friend. I’ve visited him in Geneva and he’s visited me in Toronto. We’ve travelled in Europe and North America together. I continue to rely on his guidance. At one point in my writing my 85,000 word Dissertation for Roy, he said it appeared I was trying to codify every life experience I’d ever had. This was not far off the mark. I drew on my consulting practice with leaders, quantitative research with a large sample group, reflections of the trainers in my company, academic study and my experiences being coached. I thought it was thorough and panoptic, but it could also have been termed a mish-mash.

This is where Editor Hal Jones came in. Years after my Doctorate was accepted, it came time to turn the material into an accessible book for leaders and those who work with leaders— and that’s just about everybody. I’m lucky to have had Hal in my company for about 15 years. We had been on the same newscasts—me from Toronto and he from London, Washington and Moscow for some years, but had never met face to face until I’d left Canada’s national public broadcaster-CBC, and he was on the verge of leaving. Hal observed leaders from his posts abroad. The leaders included four US Presidents and many Eastern European leaders during the dying days of the Soviet Union.

I often describe Hal’s skill to clients with an anecdote. I point out that for 18 years, mainly during the Cold War, Hal had to delve through a stack of material each day in London, Moscow and Washington. It was a mixture of news reports, official and unofficial press releases, background papers, analysis, etc., about what went on in the White House, State Department, Pentagon, No. 10 Downing Street, the Foreign Office, NATO and the Kremlin. Hal had to decide, on deadline, what was news, what was propaganda and what was just the usual detritus of bureaucracy. He got it right, including when time zones caused his deadline to be 3:00 a.m. on a regular basis. So, when Hal has to work on the weekends for one of our clients it’s an easy day-no overnights, no gunfire and no long flights to the Middle East. My giving Hal my 85,000 precious academic words and asking him to translate it into more accessible language was just another day at the office. Hal has a remarkable skill in finding the coherent thread, entry point (or lead) and pulling diverse thoughts together. We’ve had a good run and great second careers thanks to Hal.

And this brings me to the literature search. There are two schools of thought in the academic world. One is that a literature search should stand alone, showing a comprehensive attempt to understand research and writing on the topic that has gone before. The assumption is that new work is anchored in and a reflection of the old. The other school is that new ideas and research should have woven into them citations and references to existing scholarship. I’ve done both, taught both and have had supervising professors with both preferences.

As this thesis became a book, two things became clear. The stand-alone literature search felt like a gigantic pause in the narrative, lasting about a third of the book. There was no logical flow in the narrative. In fact, the flow stopped while countless studies and authors were summarized. Weaving in the citations kept a flow of sorts, but still slowed things down. We had to have a compromise between the ethics of citations and the accessibility of the material.

In the academic environment, I’ve always been a stickler for citations. Many use the term “paradigm” without reference to Thomas Kuhn or “sustainability” without crediting Madam Brundtland. Some argue these terms have become part of common parlance. Perhaps, but there is a difference between dinner party conversation and an academic paper. Footnotes may get edited out at dinner, but not in the classroom.

Then there’s this book. What to do? Hal’s advice was to achieve a smooth flow of information, uninterrupted by footnotes, quotes and in-text references. My instinct was to reference. But, I also remembered instruction from undergraduate days to put more than six words from another source in quotation marks and cite. The same Professor, instructing young students who were worried about form and format issues, said that a citation in the bibliography was the minimum standard.

So, you’ll see a bit of a contradiction in this manuscript. There is a lengthy bibliography and I’m grateful to the authors cited. But, there are few citations in the text. That doesn’t mean the text doesn’t draw on the bibliography-it does in many substantial ways. I’ve rationalized this compromise in several ways.

First, it will be pretty obvious that my “wounded leader” draws on titles that reference narcissism, working yourself to death, mental illness, good companies going bad, self-destruction, chaos, fear, humility and so on. The references to mergers and acquisitions and various books on leadership are also self-explanatory.

The ethnographic literature is there to anchor my work in a 150-year-old tradition of examination of the human condition in the field. “SCSPO” is a reference to the Scarman Centre for the Study of Public Order at Leicester University-the most remarkable and valuable academic program I’ve attended.

The references to Jack Welch draw on the citations with his name, but mainly on John Cassidy’s work. It will be pretty easy to see that I obtained statistics on the cost of depression from articles that reference this topic in their titles. Terrance Real deserved an in-text reference because of his “wounded child” concept. The crisis literature is there because it’s in crisis that I often coach leaders and it’s in a crisis when leadership traits are writ large.

The Eastern and Martial literature has obviously informed my personal experience in a Karate Dojo. This is also the case with the general business literature on decision making and organizational matters. It should be obvious that I’m grateful for my time studying leadership at Harvard and to the Harvard Business Review for easy to access compilations on topic of importance to my work and that’s why the HBR appears so often.

I hope that’s credit where it’s due. Errors and omissions are mine.