Читать книгу Tradition against communism - Алмаз Браев - Страница 8

COMMUNIST SHARIKOV

Who is the Communist Sharikov? Sharikov is a character from Bulgakov’s novel. A certain Professor Preobrazhensky performed an operation to transform a dog into a man. This new half human half human was given the name Sharikov.

Karl Marx: “Crude communism” is only a form of manifestation of the vileness of private property that wants to assert itself as a positive community” (18, p.116). Great! Russian Russian peasants liked Marxism so much, but at first the Russian intelligentsia did not. The European intelligentsia and bourgeoisie did not show much passion for Marxism.

Russian peasants liked Marxism for its clear side of equality. When Marxism came to Russia, the soldiers of the Russian Tsar were tired of dying for the Tsar. Even before the world war and the revolution in Russia, the land issue became more acute. Russian Russian intelligentsia did not need land, Russian intelligentsia needed civil rights. The bourgeoisie did not have equal rights with the Russian nobility. Russia was still a feudal power. Not all Russian intelligentsia was fascinated by Marxism, but almost all of them sought equality in civil rights. Hence the search for truth, and this truth is actually bourgeois. The Tsar was not arrested by noblemen who had dynasties, but by young noblemen whose fathers had recently received the title along with their government jobs. Of course, there were no Marxists among these patriots. But then they appeared a few months later as the main actors of the revolution.

Someone will think that the main motive of the Russian revolution was banal envy. “Take and share!”. But this is not the case. You can’t say that about the intelligentsia, but you can partially say that. The main quality of the bourgeoisie is ambition. Marxist intellectuals spoke on behalf of the people, who did not like this smart and important intellectuals. In any feudal community, smart people were never liked, considered upstarts. Therefore, after the revolution, the people themselves became important and intelligent, and the revolutionary intelligentsia was shot. Russian Russian community (and not only Russian) has always wanted to have a strict leader. The leader of a feudal community must be strict, even cruel, and not necessarily smart. Therefore, any official elected by the revolution quickly turned into a feudal Lord. Such a master of Soviet Russia was Stalin – the new red Tsar. The new red Tsar and his people shot smart intellectuals and raised their own intelligentsia – the “lousy” intelligentsia. This intelligentsia also did not like talented people. Out of a dislike for smart and extraordinary leaders therefore every Soviet leader after Stalin was even funnier than the previous one. They looked more like the heads of a Soviet collective farm, a kind of Russian community, but without a Tsar, an Orthodox faith, but with mechanical tractors instead of an ancient plow. Soviet leaders replaced each other in high positions and decreased even in physical growth. Small, small, then even smaller. This is not the self-sufficient person that Karl Marx described. There was no place even for the intimidated Soviet intelligentsia. Although all the peasants wanted to get joy and got it. Everyone wanted to be intelligent to become a master of bureaucracy. The feudal hierarchy has not disappeared. She just changed and became unrecognizable. But all former peasants received education in order to get a state position and a high salary. Then these same people wanted freedom and democracy. But all the intellectuals who came out of the people did not like their people, were Russophobes. Because all educated people, all intellectuals were harassed. They went through the path of bullying, as did the revolutionary intellectuals before them. But they were not shot as revolutionary intellectuals. Because they came from the people. Therefore they kept their anger at the crowd and this anger accumulated from childhood. They were teased as children. Because the Russian peasants and proletarians did not like people in clean clothes, with exemplary behavior, with handkerchiefs and scarves. The whole country was a colossal construction site of socialism. The proletarians under the dictator Stalin built new factories, power plants, bridges, and Railways. And then there were some suspicious and clean people walking around. No, they didn’t like intellectuals. Therefore 72 years later, when the Russian democratic reforms began in 1991, all liberal Russian intellectuals had some kind of flaw, some physical flaw, and even mental abnormalities. These intelligentsia were teased cruelly from childhood. Why should liberal intellectuals love Soviet Russia? They suffered from strabismus, and many remained psychopaths. A type of Karl Marx’s alternative man and the real Communists were destroyed by rural Pharisees and their assistants with surnamed Sharikovs in 1937. This means that Marx did not describe the social emancipation of a person from the people, in our case zeref (reflection zero, ze-re), but a person still average, with low intelligence and a person of weak culture. To remove self-alienation, that is, when a person is aware of himself as a person, they needed not only basic knowledge, the ability to read and write, but also culture, starting opportunities. But in conscientious Russia, the dictatorship of the proletariat, that is, the new dictatorship of the Russian community, was taken as the basis. Who are these proletarians? Why are they so just and Holy in Karl Marx? These are just Russian peasants who worked for a while at the factory, but were or remained peasants by blood and spirit. The Marxist intellectuals raised them above the ground. Did the saints almost. But then the tricksters and romantics were themselves destroyed, tortured, and shot by these same proletarians – former peasants. This ignorance. And Russian Marxism proved to be a heavy tax on the entire people, on the entire society, on all so-called Marxism, which eventually led to the fall of the USSR and the restoration in 1991. Farmers, even after becoming intellectuals, in the second and third generation will think about how to increase their allotment – to build a dacha, for example, or to arrange a son in a prestigious University. When this desire became great, privatization took place in Russia. Privatization and new feudalization based on new technologies is a continuation of the same tax on the elite, when the new elite wants not recognition by the Russian community, but recognition by the world elite. The children and grandchildren of Russian peasants have joined the ranks of the world’s elite with big money. This money, this gold, they stole from their people.