Читать книгу Autocracy vs. fake - Алмаз Браев - Страница 6

Who are the judges?

When the barbarians took Rome, they could only plunder and kill. Robbers and murderers were not responsible and could not answer for their crimes. Who are the judges? The sacred innovation of the times of the bloody Romanov monarchy gets new colors here. Judges are only descendants, and the judge is history. For contemporaries, if they are Romans, then Woe to the vanquished at once; if they are barbarians, then barbarians are supposed to plunder and bring booty to the family. Varvara’s family will not condemn him but will support him. Therefore, the barbarian carries everything into the house.

Ideologists of liberalism claim that if all zerefs (traditional people) are given property, they will automatically become responsible. So responsible that they will eventually demand democratic governance and root out corruption. Is it true?

But what we see.

We see that the zerefs are getting rich and don’t want to be responsible for anything. On the contrary, they carry everything to the family and build large houses (almost castles) for the family. What happens on the street the corruption and despotism of any kind, they don’t care, as long as to make the family feel good, they are not interested in anything else. On the contrary, any boss and corrupt official causes traditional people to understand: an official, a despot, and even a «tyrant» in his workplace does everything in the name of the family. In fact, any zeref in his place would do exactly the same. And to infinity. Why is it that someone else is surprised that nothing will happen to big corrupt officials, they will not be convicted, but will be amnestied? Answer. They carry everything to the family. What questions can there be? No one directly or indirectly condemns their? From the point of view of tradition and the depth of centuries, this is all normal. Who will bring the most to the grotto, the same, the most beloved.

Who condemns indirectly?

Who might have forgotten about their family? Or maybe it compares someone else’s family and someone else’s fate? I suspect that the comparison has the appearance of simple greed, otherwise there are no other motives in the tradition. An indirect denouncer of a corrupt official is a weak warrior and nothing more. He’s weak and he’s jealous. He didn’t bring anything to the grotto.

Here are some examples.

When the barbarians sacked Rome and the Romans fled, after the plunder, The eternal city seemed to disappear. What was recently, but it immediately disappeared. What used to be called Rome turned into a Gothic village with the same Gothic name. How and how was it possible to unite the Gothic shepherds, who before the capture of Rome and its plunder grazed cattle with the natives. Some knew the law, others didn’t.

What is the law of the barbarians?

The barbarian must know that each of his actions will be appreciated by his clan, so the barbarian is generous and sympathetic, but not to strangers, but only to the people of his clan (that is, to his relatives). The most authoritative leader is the one who gives away, makes gifts to the people. (In Saudi Arabia, sheikhs still do this – they give out gifts, as the ancient sheikhs did 1000 years ago. But the sheikhs are very civilized people)

.

Where did castles come from in the middle ages. They didn’t exist before.

If it so happened that the barbarians (not only Goths, but Vandals, Alans, Huns) scattered across the free land, where the former owners escaped. What should they do here? Who should they answer to? After all, the Romans are not there. So the barbarian will not answer to anyone, he is his own master, and all the loot will be put in one place. To protect yourself from other barbarians just like him. He builds an impregnable fortress, digs it with a moat, and let the river into the moat – here you have a medieval castle – fortress. (Have you noticed such locks now? I see. Although in the yard of the XXI century – A. B.)

Medieval castles this is evidence of the lack of ideas and any responsibility.

No relatives and no judges. There are no judges, so I am the judge. I can trample everyone under my horse, or I can ride anywhere I want. Who should I answer to? In front of those who think to take everything to the family? Yes, they are the same as me, only they do not have a horse and a castle (mansion, account, car Park) This is how traditional people learn to co-exist in the new middle ages, which they create as if reluctantly. Anyone who wants protection must work for the owner, and they let him in. Those who do not want protection will go without a roof or protection. Traditional people are the sources of their own medieval troubles. The middle ages will come precisely and invisibly, while some fighters against corruption will build a democracy. After the fall of Rome, there was no democracy for more than 1,000 years. Even if the fighters build a democracy themselves or with the help of the West, it will still be a castle with new vassals and feudal lords. It’s always been that way.