Читать книгу Maidan in Asia. Kazakhs and Arabs - Алмаз Браев - Страница 6

Frog caviar

What is the danger of flotagia thus involving the archaic population in market relations?

The market materializes the archaic energy of competition and destruction.

Blood and kinship play a cruel joke with the archaic population. The same joke is taken under control by external forces. That is why radical Islamism and nationalism, for example, which are super-controlled from the outside, are dangerous.

If we talk about the Arabs of the Maghreb, they had to try everything. Nationalism or national socialism was adopted by many reform officers. But they didn’t know which side to choose – the West or the USSR? Before the Suez Canal crisis, Abdel Nasser was the best friend of the German National Socialists, who did not have time to escape to Argentina. Some of these «specialists» settled in Egypt. But it was the power and authority of the USSR that allowed these Arab socialists to talk about socialism in general. (I don’t know. Is the Ba’ath Party socialist, rather nationalist? Because the catalysts of socialism still excite local patriotism among the Zerefs. But the catalysts of socialism are still, closer to Zeref’s reflection, less harmful to Zerefs peoples than the catalysts of democracy)

If the current catalysts increase the capacity of life, then the population is growing rapidly like in Libya under Gaddafi, in Iraq under Hussein, in Egypt under Mubarek.

But all the leaders of Asia do not take into account one important thing.

The population is growing exponentially, and the benefits of maintaining the standard of living are arithmetic. But all the Zerefs want to dominate! At least to live with dignity and not be disgraced in front of relatives. (That’s why at weddings and commemorations, the zerefs mostly brag about where they work or where the children study. If children study in the USA, then it’s just great!) The socialist catalyst pours equality into the heads, and the democratic one – inequality. Which is better? The question is rhetorical. Although, the local native elite itself is constantly enriching itself, thereby irritating the crowd. Which is the main reason for the uprising (in Egypt, the Mubarak clan ruled for more than thirty years, which is all tired). People who don’t understand anything about democracy want to throw off this native elite so that the next tadpole becomes a frog (I use the evolution of a frog from caviar into a tadpole and a frog itself all the time in revcon. If you declare a tadpole a frog, it will still be a tadpole. But he will still become a frog, and not something else. The democratic catalyst and his laboratory assistants want the caviar to be democratic right away. It’s impossible. I hope this is clear now).

The outstanding boxer of our time, Meni Pacquiao, built several multi-storey houses for the poor at his own expense. Why did he do it? Because he’s a politician now. And perhaps the people of the Philippines will elect him president.

Without a democratic catalyst in the minds of Filipinos, it would have been impossible: for some fist-fighting expert to become president?

But you can say to Pacquiao. Pacquiao’s act of goodwill is a simultaneous act of populism from Pacquiao. After a while, children will be born again in this area, and a lot of children and the same problem will arise as if there was no Pacquiao, and he nothing did.

Of course, flotagia excites traditional people to breed (to fight?), but flotagia does not prepare officials at all. Zerefs, become officials and steal again, steal endlessly, like a hungry loader who got into a grocery warehouse.

Why do different crooks get into officials?

This is a different question and, in fact, a problem for my other book (which is being prepared).

Both democracy and socialism work with the lower classes all the time, where there is rapid reproduction. This is probably the scourge of all mankind. Tradition does not give a chance in the face of another aristocracy or local elite for the children of «commoners» to get to the top. So do the commoners themselves, who gained power as a result of the revolution and coups. They attach only their children and relatives to big money. Does caviar turn into a frog again?