Читать книгу What Killed Jane Creba - Anita Arvast - Страница 8

Question Marks

On December 26, 2005, guys with guns drew on each other on one of the busiest streets in Canada on one of the busiest shopping days of the year. The guys who drew the guns were almost all men of colour. The shots shook Toronto and the whole nation to its core as it took the life of a sweet, fifteen-year-old girl who was merely crossing the street in the midst of what all accounts would call a case of rival gangs taking their rivalries to the streets.

In the city that was known as “Toronto, the good,” we had shit to deal with.

Jane Creba. Homicide #78/2005.

Just like that. A number.

She had a gentle smile. She was a grade 10 honours student and star athlete at Riverdale Collegiate. She lived a comfortably upscale life with her remarkably supportive family in Toronto’s primarily Greek neighbourhood. Her home was just a stone’s throw away from some of the major projects in Toronto, where guns were put on in much the same fashion most people would put on underwear. She was from a neighbourhood. They were from a hood.

Jane stole our hearts.

She was a beautiful child.

She was a beautiful child who shouldn’t have died.

Like so many children.

Jane’s shooting created terror, followed by demands that someone step up to prevent another such death. The Green Apple Project, named after Jane’s favourite food, brought massive police raids to fourteen various low-income areas in Toronto, resulting in hundreds of detentions — primarily of young, black men.

The media had a heyday. Because selling news is sometimes about telling us to be afraid, we heard about gangs with guns gone mad. The media and police christened it “The Year of the Gun.” Those reports were somewhat true. That year, nineteen people aged twenty-two or younger died at the hands of guns.[1] Those people wouldn’t really make the news though.

Joan Howard lost her son to gun violence in 2003. She cried out against the contraband weapons coming up from the United States. She cried out against the shooting of her son, whose death elicited very little media coverage.

The Toronto Star reported at the time, “Howard says Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government is missing in action in making gun violence and its aftermath a national priority. ‘I would never want to wish this kind of pain on anybody but maybe if it came to Harper’s doorstep they would do something.’”[2]

Joan Howard is a black woman. Her son was a man of colour — a youth worker, a basketball coach — shot in the head at his apartment building while on his bicycle.

Two years later, in 2005, the coverage changed. Gun violence became the news.

Jane Creba’s death forced us to pay attention. That attention was focused on the incident itself, as opposed to the underlying causes … but that’s what most of us who open a newspaper, turn on the news, view our tweets, or check out the latest on our computers want. We want digestible pieces. Instead of being encouraged to dig deeper, we want to be “in the know.” The media would deliver what we wanted. That message was easy: be scared of every young, black guy living in projects in Toronto because they were all part of gangs. Crips or Bloods. They fell short of using the N-word, because that would be politically incorrect. So we just heard this: rival gangs.

On the tenth anniversary of Jane’s death in 2015, the Toronto Star published an article about how right the police got it.[3] The article cited police as being content that they set a precedent — four men in total were convicted for her death (two for murder and two for manslaughter), but only one bullet hit Jane, and only one man fired the bullet that killed her. The Toronto Star called it “The Jane Creba Effect” — four convictions for one bullet. And one of the men charged never even fired a gun. They were all black. We were told they were all “thugs.”

They were allegedly all part of gangs.

You got time for a story?

The media did.

The N-word is a highly politicized term that some people have said ought never be pronounced. Political correctness doesn’t change perspectives, it only changes the ways people can express prejudice. People always find new ways to say it. It might not be boy and it might not be the N-word.

It might be a far more clandestine and infinitely more dangerous disguise. Just like the cover of this book.

What colour did you assume that person’s skin was?

It’s only natural. We’ve been taught these assumptions.

Thug is a word usually applied only to bullies and they are presented in typical ways — in hoodies and in high-tops with a bit of bling around the neck and usually with some variation of brown skin.

But there are thugs who are icons in corporate culture. Like Steve Jobs. A celebrated entrepreneurial thug. Thugs are academics who claim that their version of bullying is “academic freedom.” Like Phillipe Rushton, who sought to maintain a stereotype that penis sizes, race, and intelligence were all related. Thugs are police who claim that their bullying is “keeping people safe” even while they break the law. Thugs are members of our governments who claim that their bullying is “in the public interest according to their election mandate” as they monger fear and create new legislation to deal with the fear they’ve mongered. Thugs can be the media reporters who sometimes hound people to get stories. Inside their own realms, the bullies don’t get called thugs. Sometimes they don’t even get called bullies. They get called successful.

Bullies are everywhere; they hide behind their own rhetoric to justify their behaviour.

Most bullies don’t unpack their own behaviour. They take their baggage and sell it to their corporate boards, to the pulpits, to the classrooms, to Parliament, to the public. What we think is a thug isn’t white and well off. We think that the street is the only place you can find thugs.

We’d like to believe we don’t have racism in Canada. We were, after all, the final destination of the Underground Railroad not that long ago. We represented the North Star and the road to freedom.

We don’t have twenty-one-year-old white-supremacist Dylann Roof walking into a Charleston church Bible study and slaying nine people of colour. And then going to prison where he was raped and tortured. We don’t have cops shooting down black guys like they do down in the U.S. We don’t have the fifty-year-old man shot eight times in the back after running away from police for fear that he would be jailed for failing to pay child support. He’d been pulled over for a burned-out tail light. What was his name, again? Walter Scott. His family will remember, but we likely won’t. The blame was laid on that one cop who set Walter up, planting a taser beside Scott as he was dying — all that captured by someone walking by who happened to have a cellphone. We don’t have the hundreds of other incidents that don’t get captured on a cellphone.

We don’t have Freddie Gray, who had his spine fractured as he was being brought into custody, and we don’t have the protests of Baltimore. Even if the cops who caused his fatal spinal injuries have been indicted and that bit of unrest settled, we aren’t done with unrest. For every moment captured by a camera, scores more go unseen. Unrest goes quiet. But it’s there. It’s here.

It’s far easier to lay blame on individuals rather than systems. Blame those cops who abuse their power. Blame the thugs who commit crimes. Maybe make the prison deal with all this blame. Make it out all black and white, or all light and dark. Black is wrong. White is right. Light is joyful. Dark is scary. Let’s forget about anything remotely in-between.

In Canada, we don’t have Freddie or Walter. We didn’t have Rodney King. We didn’t have Malcolm X. We didn’t have Martin Luther King. Because we don’t have riots and blatant issues of racial profiling and police brutality, we’d like to think we don’t have those issues. Of course, we did have racism when the Underground Railroad brought too many ex-slaves to the East Coast and they all got put in a place called Africville, an area the city of Halifax neglected to the point of squalor. And, of course, we did have racism when the Japanese were interned during the Second World War and had all of their belongings taken from them. And, of course, we did have racism in the residential schools and our treatment of First Nations people. And we still have racism now in the hushed sentiments of “those Muslims,” and the attacks on mosques and spiteful acts carried out against women wearing hijabs.

But no. We like to think we don’t have racism like in the U.S. We don’t have potential presidents saying that we should ban all people of a particular faith from coming to our country.

What we have is systemic … something we disguise.

On December 15, 2014, some nine years after the Creba killing, the Toronto Star broke a story that the Toronto Police Service had finally brought in a psychologist from the U.S. to investigate racial profiling by members of the police force. So now we have proof that there are problems. They range from police racial biases to the carding of individuals based on race to the detention of young, African-Canadian men even when they are not being investigated in a criminal case. These practices lead to feelings, perceptions, and behaviours that run deep and cause insecurity and even hatred. It’s been there a long time, but at least we are finally talking about it.

The practice of carding had been long-standing in Toronto. It’s a simple process of a police officer stopping, questioning, and putting the name of anyone who looks questionable into a database for further reference — no matter what the person was doing. In a city of roughly two hundred thousand African Canadians, there were over one million carding incidents in a two-year period. As shown in the “carding database,” there was an egregious over-representation of young black men.

A Toronto Life journalist wrote of being carded seven times for doing nothing more than being black in public. Desmond Cole had the nerve to write about “The Skin I’m In.” Toronto got a new African-Canadian chief of police who said that he had been carded as a teenager for wearing a ball-cap backwards. He justified the policy by saying that he somehow deserved it; he shouldn’t have dressed that way. There was a polite controversy going on in Toronto. That’s how we do things in Canada. Politely. It’s why people like to visit here. It’s why people like to live here.

We also have laws we follow to ensure we remain polite.

Carding is clearly a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. This was confirmed by various studies that indicted not only the police, but many legal administration and enforcement agencies.[4] In 2015, the new Liberal government of Canada decided they would deal with this. No more carding. No more racism. Easier said than done. This was going to be a long fight. You can’t just tell cops to stop racist practices because the government has made it illegal. It will go underground and sideways until conversations between the affected communities and the police take place. These conversations take years, maybe decades. Until they do, both communities will continue to feel threatened.

There remains a great deal of insecurity around race, profiling, and the relationships between police, the community, and the journalists who have to report what is going on. Most of us don’t ever need to think about it. It doesn’t concern us.

Unless you have a child who is caught in the crossfire. Or unless your kid keeps getting asked what he’s doing because he has the wrong skin colour and was maybe driving the wrong car or walking in the wrong neighbourhood.

Nobody ever expects that a few minutes of someone else acting out on their insecurity will take a life. We think we will grow old and die of natural causes. We live our lives accordingly. Take speed seriously on highways. Don’t engage in dangerous activities. Wear a bike helmet. Wear sunscreen. Cross the street on a green light. Teach our children to be kind and expect kindness to be returned. Well. That’s most of us. We’re not children expecting to die. We’re not expecting the worst when we venture out on the streets. We dress each day to go about our business — yoga pants for the gym, a suit for work. In most cities in North America and Europe, we don’t expect violence to erupt. We think, if we keep living our routines and being good citizens, the problems of the world won’t affect us.

Grief doesn’t end overnight, and racism doesn’t end because we pretend it isn’t there. And a city awash with gunplay doesn’t get fixed by police forces that take away basic rights for the select people of colour who just happen to live in impoverished neighbourhoods. We don’t fix things when we have overcrowded jails and treat people as guilty before proven innocent. We don’t fix things when people think defence lawyers are about “getting people off,” rather than participating in a system where evidence must be examined and laws must be followed.

Very few of us know what it’s like to spend a night in the hole of a detention centre like the old Don Jail, where feces backed up regularly from sewers into the cells, rats became pets, and two of the three guys in the cell built for one were sleeping on the floor. Yet many of us say “they deserve that” or that “they shouldn’t be credited for their time in detention.” We don’t know what a “call down” is. That will be explained later. It ain’t pretty.

If we could shake those perceptions for a little while, if we could walk a mile in those high-tops, we might get closer to being done with racism, and the violence it leads to.

Millions of dollars were spent on the Green Apple Project. Hundreds of police were assigned to the surveillance. Twenty-five men were arrested in a massive raid in June 2006. Fifty-six men with direct or indirect relation to Jane’s death were arrested in total that year. Almost all of them were African Canadians.

Nine young black men and one “wannabe black” young offender were charged with her murder. The wannabe never made it to trial because they figured out he didn’t actually have a gun. The other white guy who was directly involved that day (and probably had a gun) was never charged. Instead, he became a witness. The majority of men were acquitted because there was no evidence they participated in anything other than being present that day. But many of those eventually acquitted spent four years in jail awaiting trial anyway. The guys who waited in jail were one colour.

Only one bullet struck and killed Jane.

Only one man killed her, and he eventually told the courts that he did it. The cops were never sure which bullet actually killed her. So his admission was key.

One bullet. But four young African-Canadian men were convicted of murder by a prosecution that changed its story at each trial, despite stern warnings from the judge that this wasn’t the way to do justice. These kids definitely had problems and they may have been guilty of a lot of things. But murder?

“Who killed Jane Creba?” is an easy question to answer. It was Jeremiah (Short) Valentine and his .357 Magnum. It was young men with guns from the ghettos. Thugs, as the press made them out to be.

What killed Jane is a way tougher question to answer.

The trials may be done, but the bigger question marks remain.