Читать книгу Better Births - Anna Brown - Страница 40

1 Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7e. New York: Oxford University Press.

2 Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 343: d7400.

3 Borelli, S.E., Walsh, D., and Spiby, H. (2017). First‐time mothers' choice of birthplace: influencing factors, expectations of midwife's role and perceived safety. Journal of Advanced Nursing 73 (8): 1937–1946. Wiley.

4 Boyle, S., Thomas, H., and Brooks, F. (2016). Women's views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth. Midwifery 32: 21–29.

5 Brown, A.M. (2012). Assessment strategies for teaching empathy, intuition and sensitivity on the labour ward. Evidence Based Midwifery 10 (2): 64–70.

6 Brown, A.M. and Gallagher, A. (2015). Ethical aspects of current challenges to women's choice of planned place of birth. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 25 (4): 419–423.

7 Brown, S.L. and Salmon, P. (2018). Reconciling the theory and reality of shared decision‐making: a matching approach to practitioner leadership. Health Expectations 22: 275–283.

8 Byrom, S. and Downe, S. (2010). “She sort of shine”: Midwives' accounts of “good” midwifery and “good” leadership. Midwifery 26: 126–137.

9 Care Quality Commission (2013). National findings from the 2013 survey of women's experiences of maternity care. https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/maternity_report_for_publication.pdf (accessed 13 September 2019).

10 Carolan, M. (2011). The good midwife: commencing students' views. Midwifery 27 (4): 503–508.

11 Chadwick, R. (2015). The ethical importance of safety. Bioethics 29 (4): ii.

12 Cheyne, H., McCourt, C., and Semple, K. (2013). Mother knows best: developing a consumer led evidence informed research agenda for maternity care. Midwifery 29 (6): 705–712.

13 Christman, J. (2015). Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. In: The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (ed. E.N. Zalta). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entroies/autonomy‐moral (accessed 30 July 2019).

14  Cole, C., Wellard, S., and Mummery, J. (2014). Problematising autonomy and advocacy in nursing? Nursing Ethics 21 (5): 576–582.

15 Crowther, S. and Hall, J. (2015). Spirituality and spiritual care in and around childbirth. Women and Birth 28: 173–178.

16 Daemers, D.O., van Limbeek, E.B., Wijnen, H.A. et al. (2017). Factors influencing the clinical decision‐making of midwives: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 17: 1–12.

17 Dahlberg, U. and Aune, I. (2013). The woman's birth experience‐ the effect of interpersonal relationships and continuity of care. Midwifery 29: 407–415.

18 Dahlberg, U., Persen, J., Skogas, A.K. et al. (2016). How can midwives promote a normal birth and a positive birth experience? The experience of first‐time Norwegian mothers. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare 7: 2–7.

19 Dann, L. (2007). Grace's story: an analysis of ethical issues in a case of informed consent. British Journal of Midwifery 15 (10): 634–639.

20 Davis, D. and Walker, K. (2010). The corporeal, the social and the space/place: exploring intersections from a midwifery perspective in New Zealand. A Journal of Feminist Geography: Gender, Place & Culture 17 (3): 377–391.

21 Dierckx de Casterlé, B. (2015). Realising skilled companionship in nursing: a utopian idea or difficult challenge. Journal of Clinical Nursing 24 (21–22): 3327–3335.

22 Dodwell, M. and Newburn, M. (2010). Normal Birth as a Measure of Quality Care: Evidence on Safety, Effectiveness and Women's Experiences. London: NCT.

23 Dunkley‐Bent, J. (2018). A year of opportunity: continuity of carer. Midwives Spring: 68–69.

24 Foster, I.R. and Lasser, J. (2011). Professional Ethics in Midwifery Practice. London: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

25 Gallagher, A. (2017). Care ethics & nursing practice. In: Key Concepts & Issues in Nursing Ethics (ed. A. Scott), 55–68. Springer International Publications.

26 Gibbons, K. (2010). It's more than just talking. Midwives 13 (1): 36–37.

27 Griffiths, R. (2011). Key concepts in human rights and midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery 19 (11): 748–749.

28 Halfdansdottir, B., Wilson, M.E., Hildingsson, I. et al. (2015). Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18: 591–600.

29 Hall, P.J., Whitman Foster, J., Yount, K.M. et al. (2018). Keeping it together and falling apart: women's dynamic experience of birth. Midwifery 58: 130–136.

30 Halldorsdottir, S. and Karlsdottir, S.I. (2011). The primacy of the good midwife in midwifery services: an evolving theory of professionalism in midwifery. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 25 (4): 806–817.

31 Hastings‐Tolsma, M. and Nolte, A.G. (2014). Reconceptualising failure to rescue in midwifery: a concept analysis. Midwifery 30 (6): 585–594.

32 Hermansson, E. and Martensson, L. (2011). Empowerment in the midwifery context‐ a concept analysis. Midwifery 27: 811–816.

33  Janssen, B.K. and Wiegers, T.A. (2006). Strengths and weaknesses of midwifery care from the perspective of women. Evidence Based Midwifery 4 (2): 53–59.

34 Jefford, E. and Fahy, K. (2015). Midwives' clinical reasoning during second stage of labour: report on an interpretive study. Midwifery 31 (5): 519–525.

35 Jefford, E. and Jomeen, J. (2015). Midwifery abdication: a finding from an interpretive study. International Journal of Childbirth 5 (3): 116–125.

36 Jefford, E., Fahy, K., and Sundin, D. (2010). Decision‐making theories and their usefulness to the midwifery profession both in terms of midwifery practice and the education of midwives. International Journal of Nursing Practice 17: 246–253.

37 Jenkinson, B., Krushe, S., and Kildea, S. (2017). The experience of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: the feminist thematic perspective. Midwifery 52: 1–10.

38 Jepsen, I., Mark, E., Nohr, E.A. et al. (2016). A qualitiative study of how caseload midwifery is constituted and experienced by Danish midwives. Midwifery 36: 61–69.

39 Johns, C. and Freshwater, D. (1998). Transforming Nursing through Reflective Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

40 Katz Rothman, B. (2013). Caught between autonomy and caring: still struggling towards an ethics of midwifery. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 23 (2): 143–150.

41 Leap, N. (2000). The less we do, the more we give. In: The Midwife‐Mother Relationship (ed. M. Kirkam). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

42 Lewis, J. (2019). Does shared decision making respect a patient's relational autonomy? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 25 (6): 1063–1069.

43 Linhares, C.H. (2012). The lived experience of midwives with spirituality in childbirth. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 57 (2): 165–171.

44 MacLellan, J. (2014). Claiming an ethics of care for midwives. Nursing Ethics 21 (7): 803–811.

45 McCormick, T.R. (2013). Principles of Bioethics. Ethics in Medicine. University of Washington, School of Medicine.

46 McCourt, C. and Stevens, T. (2009). Relationships and reciprocity in caseload midwifery. In: Emotions in Midwifery & Reproduction (eds. B. Hunter and R. Deery). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

47 Meadow, S. (2014). Defining the doula's role: fostering relational autonomy. Health Expectations 18: 3057–3068.

48 Medical Dictionary (2019). Empathy and Relexivity. In: The Free Dictionary https://medical‐dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/empathy/reflexivity (accessed 2 August 2019).

49 Midwifery (2020). Programme (2010) in Association with Department of Health & Social Care Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations. Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates.

50  Moloney, S. and Gair, S. (2015). Empathy and spiritual carein midwifery practice: contributing to women's enhanced birth experiences. Women & Birth 28 (4): 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.009.

51 Morad, S., Parry‐Smith, W., and McSherry, W. (2013). Dignity in maternity care. Evidence Based Midwifery 11 (2): 67–70.

52 Newnham, E. and Kirkham, M. (2019). Beyond autonomy: care ethics for midwifery and the humanisation of birth. Nursing Ethics 26 (7–8): 2147–2157.

53 Newnham, E., McKellar, L., and Pincombe, J. (2017). “It's your body, but …” Mixed messages to childbirth education: findings from a hospital ethnography. Midwifery 55: 53–59.

54 NHS England (2016). Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England: A Five Year Forward for Better Maternity Care. NHS England.

55 NHS England (2017). Implementing Better Births: Continuity of carer. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2017/12/implementing‐better‐births.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).

56 Nicholls, L. and Webb, C. (2006). What makes a good miwife? An integrative reviw of methodologically‐diverse research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56 (4): 414–429.

57 Nieuwenhuijze, M.J., Korstjens, I., de Jonge, A. et al. (2014). On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision‐making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14: 223.

58 NMC (2018). Code of Professional Conduct. London: The Nursing and Midwifery Council Publications.

59 Noseworthy, D.A., Phibbs, R.A., and Benn, C.A. (2013). Towards a relational model of decision‐making in midwifery care. Midwifery 29 (7): e42–e48.

60 Overgaard, C., Fenger‐Gron, M., and Sandall, J. (2014). The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care. Social Science & Medicine 74 (7): 973–981.

61 Pembroke, N.F. and Pembroke, J.J. (2008). The spirituality of presence in midwifery care. Midwifery 24: 321–327.

62 Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. (2011). Solodarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

63 Raynor, M. and England, C. (2010). Psychology for Midwives: Pregnancy, Birth and Puerperium. London: Open University press.

64 Reed, R., Rowe, J., and Barnes, M. (2016). Midwifery practice during birth: ritual companionship. Women and Birth 29: 269–278.

65 Renfew, M.J., Dyson, L., Herbet, G. et al. (2008). Developing evidence based recommendations in public health: incorporating the views of practitioners, service users and user representatives. Health Expectations 11 (1): 3–15.

66 Rodgers, B.L. (1989). Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing 14: 330–335.

67  Ross‐Davie, M. and Cheyne, H. (2014). Intrapartum support: what do women want? A literature review. Evidence Based Midwifery 12 (2): 52–58.

68 Royal College of Midwives (2017). Can continuity work for us? A resource for midwives. London: Royal College of Midwives Publication.

69 Sandall, J. (2017). The Contribution of Continuity of Midwifery Care to High Quality Maternity Care. London: Royal College of Midwives.

70 Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gate, S. et al. (2015). Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (8). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5 (Accessed 14 September 2019).

71 Smith, J. (2016). Decision making in midwifery: a tripartite clinical decision. British Journal of Midwifery 24 (8): 574–580.

72 Smith, E., Ross, F., Donovan, S. et al. (2008). Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of the evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45 (2): 298–315.

73 Taylor, B., Cross‐Sudworth, F., and MacArthur, C. (2018). Better Births and Continuity: Midwife Survey Results. Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham.

74 Thompson, F.E. (2005). The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics. Australian Midwifery 18 (3): 17–21.

75 Thompson, A. (2013). Midwives' experiences of caring fro women whose requests are not within policies and guidelines. British Journal of Midwifery 21 (8): 564–570.

76 Thompson, S.M., Nieuwenhuize, M.J., Kane Low, L., and de Vries, R. (2016). Exploring Dutch midwives' attitudes to promoting physiological childbirth: a qualitative study. Midwifery 42: 67–73.

77 Walsh, D. and Devane, D. (2012). A metasynthesis of midwife‐led care. Qualitative Health Research 22 (7): 897.

78 Weltens, M., de Nooijer, J., and Nieuwenhuijze, M. (2019). Influencing factors in midwives' decision making during childbirth: a qualitiative study in the Netherlands. Women & Birth 32 (2): e197–e203.

79 Whitburn, L.Y., Jones, L.E., Davey, M.A., and McDonald, S. (2019). The nature of labour pain: an updated review of the literature. Women & Birth 32: 28–38.

80 Yoshida, Y. and Sandall, J. (2013). Occupational burnout and work factors in community and hospital midwives: a survey analysis. Midwifery 29 (8): 921–926.