Читать книгу Microsoft Ignite A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
2. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
3. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
4. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
5. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
6. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
7. What are the operational costs after Microsoft Ignite deployment?
<--- Score
8. Among the Microsoft Ignite product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
9. How frequently do you track Microsoft Ignite measures?
<--- Score
10. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
11. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
12. What are your key Microsoft Ignite organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
13. What are the focus areas of corresponding new business units?
<--- Score
14. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
15. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
16. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
17. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
18. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
19. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
20. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
21. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
22. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
23. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
24. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
25. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
26. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
27. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
28. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
29. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
30. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
31. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
32. What details are required of the Microsoft Ignite cost structure?
<--- Score
33. What potential environmental factors impact the Microsoft Ignite effort?
<--- Score
34. What challenges do enterprises face when adopting data analytics technologies?
<--- Score
35. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
36. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
37. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
38. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
39. Why a Microsoft Ignite focus?
<--- Score
40. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Microsoft Ignite results?
<--- Score
41. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
42. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
43. What is the cause of any Microsoft Ignite gaps?
<--- Score
44. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
45. At what cost?
<--- Score
46. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
47. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
48. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
49. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
50. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
51. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
52. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
53. Does a Microsoft Ignite quantification method exist?
<--- Score
54. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
55. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
56. Do you have any cost Microsoft Ignite limitation requirements?
<--- Score
57. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
58. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
59. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
60. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
61. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
62. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
63. Which Microsoft Ignite impacts are significant?
<--- Score
64. The approach of traditional Microsoft Ignite works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
65. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
66. Does the Microsoft Ignite task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
67. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
68. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
69. How frequently do you verify your Microsoft Ignite strategy?
<--- Score
70. How do you verify Microsoft Ignite completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
71. Is the cost worth the Microsoft Ignite effort ?
<--- Score
72. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
73. How sensitive must the Microsoft Ignite strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
74. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Microsoft Ignite services/products?
<--- Score
75. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
76. How can a Microsoft Ignite test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
77. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
78. What is the total cost related to deploying Microsoft Ignite, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
79. How is the value delivered by Microsoft Ignite being measured?
<--- Score
80. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
81. What is the Microsoft Ignite business impact?
<--- Score
82. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
83. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
84. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
85. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
86. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
87. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
88. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
89. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
90. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
91. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
92. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
93. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
94. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
95. How do you verify and validate the Microsoft Ignite data?
<--- Score
96. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
97. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
98. What are the Microsoft Ignite key cost drivers?
<--- Score
99. What are hidden Microsoft Ignite quality costs?
<--- Score
100. Have you included everything in your Microsoft Ignite cost models?
<--- Score
101. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
102. How do your measurements capture actionable Microsoft Ignite information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
103. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
104. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
105. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
106. What are the Microsoft Ignite investment costs?
<--- Score
107. Is a follow-up focused external Microsoft Ignite review required?
<--- Score
108. How do you verify if Microsoft Ignite is built right?
<--- Score
109. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
110. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
111. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
112. How do you measure efficient delivery of Microsoft Ignite services?
<--- Score
113. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
114. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
115. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
116. How do you verify the Microsoft Ignite requirements quality?
<--- Score
117. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
118. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
119. What are the current costs of the Microsoft Ignite process?
<--- Score
120. Is there need for your organization to move quickly and in a more focused way?
<--- Score
121. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
122. What are the costs of delaying Microsoft Ignite action?
<--- Score
123. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
124. Are indirect costs charged to the Microsoft Ignite program?
<--- Score
125. Will Microsoft Ignite have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
126. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
127. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
128. Are the Microsoft Ignite benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
129. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
130. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
131. What are the costs?
<--- Score
132. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
133. What is your Microsoft Ignite quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
134. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
135. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
136. Are Microsoft Ignite vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
