Читать книгу Microsoft Exchange Server A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9

Оглавление

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What are your operating costs?

<--- Score

2. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

<--- Score

3. Will Microsoft Exchange Server have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

<--- Score

4. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

<--- Score

5. What are predictive Microsoft Exchange Server analytics?

<--- Score

6. What could cause delays in the schedule?

<--- Score

7. How will you measure success?

<--- Score

8. What measurements are being captured?

<--- Score

9. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

<--- Score

10. Among the Microsoft Exchange Server product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

<--- Score

11. Are missed Microsoft Exchange Server opportunities costing your organization money?

<--- Score

12. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

<--- Score

13. What details are required of the Microsoft Exchange Server cost structure?

<--- Score

14. How do you verify if Microsoft Exchange Server is built right?

<--- Score

15. How much does it cost?

<--- Score

16. What does your operating model cost?

<--- Score

17. What can be used to verify compliance?

<--- Score

18. How can you manage cost down?

<--- Score

19. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

<--- Score

20. What does a Test Case verify?

<--- Score

21. What are the Microsoft Exchange Server key cost drivers?

<--- Score

22. Which Microsoft Exchange Server impacts are significant?

<--- Score

23. What users will be impacted?

<--- Score

24. How do you verify performance?

<--- Score

25. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Microsoft Exchange Server? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

<--- Score

26. Is the cost worth the Microsoft Exchange Server effort ?

<--- Score

27. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

<--- Score

28. What is the Microsoft Exchange Server business impact?

<--- Score

29. How do you measure variability?

<--- Score

30. Has a cost center been established?

<--- Score

31. What causes mismanagement?

<--- Score

32. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

<--- Score

33. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

<--- Score

34. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

<--- Score

35. What does losing customers cost your organization?

<--- Score

36. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

<--- Score

37. What are the costs and benefits?

<--- Score

38. What tests verify requirements?

<--- Score

39. How do you verify the Microsoft Exchange Server requirements quality?

<--- Score

40. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

<--- Score

41. What is the total cost related to deploying Microsoft Exchange Server, including any consulting or professional services?

<--- Score

42. What is your Microsoft Exchange Server quality cost segregation study?

<--- Score

43. What are allowable costs?

<--- Score

44. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

<--- Score

45. What are the operational costs after Microsoft Exchange Server deployment?

<--- Score

46. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

<--- Score

47. How is performance measured?

<--- Score

48. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

<--- Score

49. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

<--- Score

50. Can you do Microsoft Exchange Server without complex (expensive) analysis?

<--- Score

51. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

<--- Score

52. Where can you go to verify the info?

<--- Score

53. Was a life-cycle cost analysis performed?

<--- Score

54. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

<--- Score

55. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

<--- Score

56. When should you bother with diagrams?

<--- Score

57. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

<--- Score

58. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

<--- Score

59. How will the Microsoft Exchange Server data be analyzed?

<--- Score

60. Where is the cost?

<--- Score

61. When are costs are incurred?

<--- Score

62. What does it cost for outsourced Exchange hosting?

<--- Score

63. What are the costs of delaying Microsoft Exchange Server action?

<--- Score

64. When is Root Cause Analysis Required?

<--- Score

65. What is the cause of any Microsoft Exchange Server gaps?

<--- Score

66. What are your key Microsoft Exchange Server organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

<--- Score

67. Who should receive measurement reports?

<--- Score

68. Are there measurements based on task performance?

<--- Score

69. Is a follow-up focused external Microsoft Exchange Server review required?

<--- Score

70. What potential environmental factors impact the Microsoft Exchange Server effort?

<--- Score

71. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

<--- Score

72. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

<--- Score

73. How is progress measured?

<--- Score

74. Are the measurements objective?

<--- Score

75. How do your measurements capture actionable Microsoft Exchange Server information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

<--- Score

76. How are you verifying it?

<--- Score

77. What are the Microsoft Exchange Server investment costs?

<--- Score

78. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

<--- Score

79. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Microsoft Exchange Server results?

<--- Score

80. What are the costs of reform?

<--- Score

81. What could cause you to change course?

<--- Score

82. How do you measure lifecycle phases?

<--- Score

83. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Microsoft Exchange Server services/products?

<--- Score

84. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?

<--- Score

85. What is measured? Why?

<--- Score

86. What does verifying compliance entail?

<--- Score

87. What evidence is there and what is measured?

<--- Score

88. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?

<--- Score

89. What is your cost benefit analysis?

<--- Score

90. Do you have any cost Microsoft Exchange Server limitation requirements?

<--- Score

91. How do you verify and validate the Microsoft Exchange Server data?

<--- Score

92. How are measurements made?

<--- Score

93. How frequently do you verify your Microsoft Exchange Server strategy?

<--- Score

94. What are your customers expectations and measures?

<--- Score

95. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

<--- Score

96. At what cost?

<--- Score

97. What drives O&M cost?

<--- Score

98. What is an unallowable cost?

<--- Score

99. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

<--- Score

100. How can you measure Microsoft Exchange Server in a systematic way?

<--- Score

101. What do people want to verify?

<--- Score

102. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

<--- Score

103. What causes investor action?

<--- Score

104. How can a Microsoft Exchange Server test verify your ideas or assumptions?

<--- Score

105. Why a Microsoft Exchange Server focus?

<--- Score

106. How do you measure success?

<--- Score

107. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

<--- Score

108. Are there competing Microsoft Exchange Server priorities?

<--- Score

109. What would it cost to replace your technology?

<--- Score

110. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

<--- Score

111. Are Microsoft Exchange Server vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

<--- Score

112. What kind of analytics data will be gathered?

<--- Score

113. Which measures and indicators matter?

<--- Score

114. What are the costs?

<--- Score

115. What is the total fixed cost?

<--- Score

116. Where is it measured?

<--- Score

117. How do you verify Microsoft Exchange Server completeness and accuracy?

<--- Score

118. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?

<--- Score

119. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

<--- Score

120. How will effects be measured?

<--- Score

121. How do you do risk analysis of rare, cascading, catastrophic events?

<--- Score

122. What is the actual cost of email?

<--- Score

123. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

<--- Score

124. What do you measure and why?

<--- Score

125. How is the value delivered by Microsoft Exchange Server being measured?

<--- Score

126. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

<--- Score

127. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

<--- Score

128. How will costs be allocated?

<--- Score

129. Does the Microsoft Exchange Server task fit the client’s priorities?

<--- Score

130. How frequently do you track Microsoft Exchange Server measures?

<--- Score

131. How do you measure efficient delivery of Microsoft Exchange Server services?

Microsoft Exchange Server A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх