Читать книгу Construction Estimating Software A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What gets examined?
<--- Score
2. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
3. How do you manage changes in Construction Estimating Software requirements?
<--- Score
4. Is the scope of Construction Estimating Software defined?
<--- Score
5. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
6. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
7. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
8. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
9. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
10. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
11. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
12. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
13. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
14. What would be the goal or target for a Construction Estimating Software’s improvement team?
<--- Score
15. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
16. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
17. Has the Construction Estimating Software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
18. What is the scope of the Construction Estimating Software work?
<--- Score
19. Have all basic functions of Construction Estimating Software been defined?
<--- Score
20. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
21. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
22. What are the core elements of the Construction Estimating Software business case?
<--- Score
23. How do you manage unclear Construction Estimating Software requirements?
<--- Score
24. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
25. Will team members perform Construction Estimating Software work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
26. What sources do you use to gather information for a Construction Estimating Software study?
<--- Score
27. What is the scope of Construction Estimating Software?
<--- Score
28. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Construction Estimating Software results are met?
<--- Score
29. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Construction Estimating Software work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
30. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
31. How do you catch Construction Estimating Software definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
32. Is there any additional Construction Estimating Software definition of success?
<--- Score
33. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
34. Do you all define Construction Estimating Software in the same way?
<--- Score
35. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Construction Estimating Software changes?
<--- Score
36. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
37. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
38. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
39. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
40. Is Construction Estimating Software currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
41. What Construction Estimating Software services do you require?
<--- Score
42. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
43. Is the Construction Estimating Software scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
44. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Construction Estimating Software?
<--- Score
45. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
46. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope of the Construction Estimating Software effort?
<--- Score
48. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
49. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
50. What system do you use for gathering Construction Estimating Software information?
<--- Score
51. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
52. Will team members regularly document their Construction Estimating Software work?
<--- Score
53. What Construction Estimating Software requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
54. How will the Construction Estimating Software team and the group measure complete success of Construction Estimating Software?
<--- Score
55. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
56. What are (control) requirements for Construction Estimating Software Information?
<--- Score
57. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
58. How do you hand over Construction Estimating Software context?
<--- Score
59. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
60. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
61. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
62. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
63. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
64. Has a Construction Estimating Software requirement not been met?
<--- Score
65. Who approved the Construction Estimating Software scope?
<--- Score
66. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
67. Do you have a Construction Estimating Software success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
68. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
69. Why are you doing Construction Estimating Software and what is the scope?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Construction Estimating Software improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. What are the Construction Estimating Software use cases?
<--- Score
72. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
73. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
74. Is Construction Estimating Software required?
<--- Score
75. How do you think the partners involved in Construction Estimating Software would have defined success?
<--- Score
76. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
77. How did the Construction Estimating Software manager receive input to the development of a Construction Estimating Software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
78. How does the Construction Estimating Software manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. Is there a critical path to deliver Construction Estimating Software results?
<--- Score
80. Who is gathering Construction Estimating Software information?
<--- Score
81. Is special Construction Estimating Software user knowledge required?
<--- Score
82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
83. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
85. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Construction Estimating Software brings?
<--- Score
86. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
87. Is the Construction Estimating Software scope manageable?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Construction Estimating Software excellence?
<--- Score
89. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
90. What is the context?
<--- Score
91. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
92. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
93. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
94. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
95. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
96. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Construction Estimating Software? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
97. How would you define Construction Estimating Software leadership?
<--- Score
98. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
99. Is there a Construction Estimating Software management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
100. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
101. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
102. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
103. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
104. Is there a clear Construction Estimating Software case definition?
<--- Score
105. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
106. Are the Construction Estimating Software requirements complete?
<--- Score
107. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Construction Estimating Software leverage and how?
<--- Score
108. What are the Construction Estimating Software tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
109. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
110. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
111. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
112. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
113. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
114. Are accountability and ownership for Construction Estimating Software clearly defined?
<--- Score
115. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
116. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Construction Estimating Software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
117. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
118. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
119. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
120. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
121. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
122. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
123. How are consistent Construction Estimating Software definitions important?
<--- Score
124. When is/was the Construction Estimating Software start date?
<--- Score
125. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
126. How can the value of Construction Estimating Software be defined?
<--- Score
127. Will a Construction Estimating Software production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
128. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
129. Are the Construction Estimating Software requirements testable?
<--- Score
130. What is in scope?
<--- Score
131. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
132. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
133. Is Construction Estimating Software linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
134. What are the record-keeping requirements of Construction Estimating Software activities?
<--- Score
135. How have you defined all Construction Estimating Software requirements first?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Construction Estimating Software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
