Читать книгу Software AG A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 7
ОглавлениеCRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
2. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
3. Who should resolve the Software AG issues?
<--- Score
4. Are there Software AG problems defined?
<--- Score
5. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
6. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
7. How are the Software AG’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
8. Did you miss any major Software AG issues?
<--- Score
9. Is it needed?
<--- Score
10. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Software AG?
<--- Score
11. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
12. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Software AG?
<--- Score
13. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
14. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
15. For your Software AG project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
16. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
17. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
18. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Software AG will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
19. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
20. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
21. Will Software AG deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
22. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
23. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
24. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
25. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
26. What is the extent or complexity of the Software AG problem?
<--- Score
27. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
28. What vendors make products that address the Software AG needs?
<--- Score
29. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
30. Consider your own Software AG project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
31. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
32. Think about the people you identified for your Software AG project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
33. What Software AG problem should be solved?
<--- Score
34. What situation(s) led to this Software AG Self Assessment?
<--- Score
35. Do you need to avoid or amend any Software AG activities?
<--- Score
36. Who needs to know about Software AG?
<--- Score
37. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
38. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
39. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
40. Does Software AG create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
41. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
42. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
43. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
44. What Software AG events should you attend?
<--- Score
45. What are your needs in relation to Software AG skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
46. When a Software AG manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
47. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
48. How do you recognize an Software AG objection?
<--- Score
49. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
50. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
51. Why the need?
<--- Score
52. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
53. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Software AG research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
54. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
55. Do you know what you need to know about Software AG?
<--- Score
56. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
57. What Software AG coordination do you need?
<--- Score
58. What are the expected benefits of Software AG to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
59. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
60. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
61. Have you identified your Software AG key performance indicators?
<--- Score
62. Does your organization need more Software AG education?
<--- Score
63. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Software AG project?
<--- Score
64. What information do users need?
<--- Score
65. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
66. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Software AG team, Software AG itself?
<--- Score
67. What Software AG capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
68. What is the Software AG problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
69. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
70. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
71. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
72. What would happen if Software AG weren’t done?
<--- Score
73. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
74. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
75. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
76. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
77. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
78. Are there recognized Software AG problems?
<--- Score
79. What does Software AG success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
80. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Software AG? In other words, what are the risks, if Software AG does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
81. Which information does the Software AG business case need to include?
<--- Score
82. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
83. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
84. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
85. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
86. Do you recognize Software AG achievements?
<--- Score
87. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
88. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
89. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Software AG delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
90. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
91. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
92. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
93. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Software AG as an effective investment?
<--- Score
94. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
95. How do you assess your Software AG workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
96. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
97. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
98. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Software AG Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
