Читать книгу Green Infrastructure For Water Management A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<--- Score

2. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<--- Score

3. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<--- Score

4. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

5. How do you build the right business case?

<--- Score

6. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Green Infrastructure for Water Management work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

7. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Green Infrastructure for Water Management changes?

<--- Score

8. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Green Infrastructure for Water Management?

<--- Score

9. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

10. Is there any additional Green Infrastructure for Water Management definition of success?

<--- Score

11. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

12. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

13. Is the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

14. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

15. What happens if Green Infrastructure for Water Management’s scope changes?

<--- Score

16. Will a Green Infrastructure for Water Management production readiness review be required?

<--- Score

17. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Green Infrastructure for Water Management brings?

<--- Score

18. Who approved the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope?

<--- Score

19. What is the scope of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management work?

<--- Score

20. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<--- Score

21. What is the definition of Green Infrastructure for Water Management excellence?

<--- Score

22. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

23. Will team members regularly document their Green Infrastructure for Water Management work?

<--- Score

24. What is the scope of Green Infrastructure for Water Management?

<--- Score

25. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<--- Score

26. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

27. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

28. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

29. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

<--- Score

30. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<--- Score

31. Will team members perform Green Infrastructure for Water Management work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

<--- Score

32. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<--- Score

33. Have all basic functions of Green Infrastructure for Water Management been defined?

<--- Score

34. Does the scope remain the same?

<--- Score

35. What is the definition of success?

<--- Score

36. Is special Green Infrastructure for Water Management user knowledge required?

<--- Score

37. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<--- Score

38. How would you define Green Infrastructure for Water Management leadership?

<--- Score

39. Has your scope been defined?

<--- Score

40. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

41. What is the context?

<--- Score

42. What gets examined?

<--- Score

43. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<--- Score

44. How do you gather requirements?

<--- Score

45. What intelligence can you gather?

<--- Score

46. Are accountability and ownership for Green Infrastructure for Water Management clearly defined?

<--- Score

47. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

48. What Green Infrastructure for Water Management services do you require?

<--- Score

49. The political context: who holds power?

<--- Score

50. Is the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope manageable?

<--- Score

51. Is Green Infrastructure for Water Management currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

52. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

<--- Score

53. What are the requirements for audit information?

<--- Score

54. How does the Green Infrastructure for Water Management manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

55. Do you all define Green Infrastructure for Water Management in the same way?

<--- Score

56. What is out-of-scope initially?

<--- Score

57. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

58. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Green Infrastructure for Water Management goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

59. What information should you gather?

<--- Score

60. How do you think the partners involved in Green Infrastructure for Water Management would have defined success?

<--- Score

61. What sources do you use to gather information for a Green Infrastructure for Water Management study?

<--- Score

62. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<--- Score

63. Is the scope of Green Infrastructure for Water Management defined?

<--- Score

64. What are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

65. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

66. What Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements should be gathered?

<--- Score

67. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

68. How do you hand over Green Infrastructure for Water Management context?

<--- Score

69. Has a Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirement not been met?

<--- Score

70. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<--- Score

71. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

72. Where can you gather more information?

<--- Score

73. What are the core elements of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management business case?

<--- Score

74. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

75. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

76. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

77. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

<--- Score

78. Has the Green Infrastructure for Water Management work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

79. Who are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

80. How can the value of Green Infrastructure for Water Management be defined?

<--- Score

81. How do you manage scope?

<--- Score

82. How did the Green Infrastructure for Water Management manager receive input to the development of a Green Infrastructure for Water Management improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

83. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

<--- Score

84. What is in scope?

<--- Score

85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

86. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Green Infrastructure for Water Management leverage and how?

<--- Score

87. How do you catch Green Infrastructure for Water Management definition inconsistencies?

<--- Score

88. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<--- Score

89. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

90. Do you have a Green Infrastructure for Water Management success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

91. How do you manage unclear Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements?

<--- Score

92. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<--- Score

93. What is the scope of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management effort?

<--- Score

94. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

95. When is/was the Green Infrastructure for Water Management start date?

<--- Score

96. What sort of initial information to gather?

<--- Score

97. What are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management use cases?

<--- Score

98. How have you defined all Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements first?

<--- Score

99. Who is gathering information?

<--- Score

100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

101. Why are you doing Green Infrastructure for Water Management and what is the scope?

<--- Score

102. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

103. Is Green Infrastructure for Water Management required?

<--- Score

104. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

105. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

<--- Score

106. How are consistent Green Infrastructure for Water Management definitions important?

<--- Score

107. What would be the goal or target for a Green Infrastructure for Water Management’s improvement team?

<--- Score

108. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<--- Score

109. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

110. What was the context?

<--- Score

111. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

112. What are the tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

113. What system do you use for gathering Green Infrastructure for Water Management information?

<--- Score

114. Are all requirements met?

<--- Score

115. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

116. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

117. Who is gathering Green Infrastructure for Water Management information?

<--- Score

118. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Green Infrastructure for Water Management? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

119. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

120. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

<--- Score

121. What is out of scope?

<--- Score

122. Is there a Green Infrastructure for Water Management management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

<--- Score

123. What is the worst case scenario?

<--- Score

124. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

125. Are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements testable?

<--- Score

126. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<--- Score

127. How will the Green Infrastructure for Water Management team and the group measure complete success of Green Infrastructure for Water Management?

<--- Score

128. Are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements complete?

<--- Score

129. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

130. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<--- Score

131. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<--- Score

132. What are the record-keeping requirements of Green Infrastructure for Water Management activities?

<--- Score

133. Is Green Infrastructure for Water Management linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

134. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Green Infrastructure for Water Management results are met?

<--- Score

135. How do you gather Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements?

<--- Score

136. Scope of sensitive information?

<--- Score

137. Is there a critical path to deliver Green Infrastructure for Water Management results?

<--- Score

138. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

139. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

140. What are (control) requirements for Green Infrastructure for Water Management Information?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Green Infrastructure for Water Management Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.