Читать книгу Decentralization Of Power A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Do you all define Decentralization of power in the same way?
<--- Score
2. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
3. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
4. How can the value of Decentralization of power be defined?
<--- Score
5. Has the Decentralization of power work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
6. What is the definition of Decentralization of power excellence?
<--- Score
7. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
8. How do you gather Decentralization of power requirements?
<--- Score
9. How do you catch Decentralization of power definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
10. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
11. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
12. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
13. Is the scope of Decentralization of power defined?
<--- Score
14. Is Decentralization of power required?
<--- Score
15. How do you think the partners involved in Decentralization of power would have defined success?
<--- Score
16. What system do you use for gathering Decentralization of power information?
<--- Score
17. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Decentralization of power leverage and how?
<--- Score
18. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
19. Is the Decentralization of power scope manageable?
<--- Score
20. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
21. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
22. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
23. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
24. How do you manage unclear Decentralization of power requirements?
<--- Score
25. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
26. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
27. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Decentralization of power?
<--- Score
28. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
29. Are the Decentralization of power requirements testable?
<--- Score
30. What happens if Decentralization of power’s scope changes?
<--- Score
31. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Decentralization of power goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
32. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
33. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
34. Is the Decentralization of power scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
35. What are the core elements of the Decentralization of power business case?
<--- Score
36. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
37. What are the Decentralization of power tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
38. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
39. Who is gathering Decentralization of power information?
<--- Score
40. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
41. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
42. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
43. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
44. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
45. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
46. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
47. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
48. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
49. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
50. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
51. How does the Decentralization of power manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
52. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
53. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
54. What would be the goal or target for a Decentralization of power’s improvement team?
<--- Score
55. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
56. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Decentralization of power changes?
<--- Score
57. What is the context?
<--- Score
58. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
59. Are improvement team members fully trained on Decentralization of power?
<--- Score
60. Are accountability and ownership for Decentralization of power clearly defined?
<--- Score
61. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
62. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
63. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Decentralization of power results are met?
<--- Score
64. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. What are (control) requirements for Decentralization of power Information?
<--- Score
66. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
67. What is in scope?
<--- Score
68. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
69. What was the context?
<--- Score
70. What sources do you use to gather information for a Decentralization of power study?
<--- Score
71. Is special Decentralization of power user knowledge required?
<--- Score
72. Who approved the Decentralization of power scope?
<--- Score
73. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
74. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
75. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
76. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
77. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
80. Are the Decentralization of power requirements complete?
<--- Score
81. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope?
<--- Score
83. Is there a clear Decentralization of power case definition?
<--- Score
84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
85. What are the record-keeping requirements of Decentralization of power activities?
<--- Score
86. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
87. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
88. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
89. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
90. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
91. Will team members perform Decentralization of power work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
92. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
93. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
94. Why are you doing Decentralization of power and what is the scope?
<--- Score
95. Will team members regularly document their Decentralization of power work?
<--- Score
96. What gets examined?
<--- Score
97. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
98. How do you manage changes in Decentralization of power requirements?
<--- Score
99. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
100. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
101. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
102. Is Decentralization of power currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
103. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
104. Will a Decentralization of power production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
105. What Decentralization of power requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
106. How will the Decentralization of power team and the group measure complete success of Decentralization of power?
<--- Score
107. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
108. Who are the Decentralization of power improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
109. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
110. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
111. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
112. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Decentralization of power? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
113. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
114. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
115. What are the Decentralization of power use cases?
<--- Score
116. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
117. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
118. Has a Decentralization of power requirement not been met?
<--- Score
119. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
120. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
121. How do you hand over Decentralization of power context?
<--- Score
122. Is there a critical path to deliver Decentralization of power results?
<--- Score
123. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
124. How did the Decentralization of power manager receive input to the development of a Decentralization of power improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
125. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
126. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
127. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Decentralization of power brings?
<--- Score
128. Is there a Decentralization of power management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
129. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
130. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
131. Is there any additional Decentralization of power definition of success?
<--- Score
132. Is Decentralization of power linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
133. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
134. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Decentralization of power work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
135. When is/was the Decentralization of power start date?
<--- Score
136. How would you define Decentralization of power leadership?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Decentralization of power Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
