Читать книгу Data Binding A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
2. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
3. How would you define Data binding leadership?
<--- Score
4. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
5. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
6. Has the Data binding work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
7. What Data binding requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
8. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
9. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
10. Is Data binding linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
11. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
12. Is the Data binding scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
13. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
14. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Data binding results are met?
<--- Score
15. Is the Data binding scope manageable?
<--- Score
16. Is Data binding required?
<--- Score
17. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Data binding brings?
<--- Score
18. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
19. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
20. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
21. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Data binding changes?
<--- Score
22. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
23. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Data binding? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
24. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
25. Are accountability and ownership for Data binding clearly defined?
<--- Score
26. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
27. Do you have a Data binding success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
28. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
29. Will team members perform Data binding work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
30. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
31. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
32. Who are the Data binding improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
33. Who is gathering Data binding information?
<--- Score
34. Why are you doing Data binding and what is the scope?
<--- Score
35. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
36. What sources do you use to gather information for a Data binding study?
<--- Score
37. Has a Data binding requirement not been met?
<--- Score
38. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
39. Is there a clear Data binding case definition?
<--- Score
40. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
41. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
42. How did the Data binding manager receive input to the development of a Data binding improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
43. Is the scope of Data binding defined?
<--- Score
44. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
45. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
46. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
47. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
48. When is/was the Data binding start date?
<--- Score
49. What is in scope?
<--- Score
50. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
51. What are the Data binding use cases?
<--- Score
52. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
53. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
54. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
55. Is special Data binding user knowledge required?
<--- Score
56. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
57. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
58. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
59. How will the Data binding team and the group measure complete success of Data binding?
<--- Score
60. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
61. How have you defined all Data binding requirements first?
<--- Score
62. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
63. How does the Data binding manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
65. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
66. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
67. How do you think the partners involved in Data binding would have defined success?
<--- Score
68. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Data binding work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
69. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Data binding?
<--- Score
70. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
71. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
72. What are the record-keeping requirements of Data binding activities?
<--- Score
73. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
74. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
75. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
76. What happens if Data binding’s scope changes?
<--- Score
77. What gets examined?
<--- Score
78. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
79. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
80. How do you gather Data binding requirements?
<--- Score
81. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
82. Who approved the Data binding scope?
<--- Score
83. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
84. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
85. Are the Data binding requirements testable?
<--- Score
86. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
87. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
88. What system do you use for gathering Data binding information?
<--- Score
89. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
90. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
91. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
92. How do you hand over Data binding context?
<--- Score
93. Will team members regularly document their Data binding work?
<--- Score
94. What is the scope of Data binding?
<--- Score
95. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
96. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
97. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
98. What are (control) requirements for Data binding Information?
<--- Score
99. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
100. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
101. Are the Data binding requirements complete?
<--- Score
102. What is the scope of the Data binding effort?
<--- Score
103. How do you manage unclear Data binding requirements?
<--- Score
104. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
105. Have all basic functions of Data binding been defined?
<--- Score
106. Is there a Data binding management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
107. Is there a critical path to deliver Data binding results?
<--- Score
108. How are consistent Data binding definitions important?
<--- Score
109. What are the core elements of the Data binding business case?
<--- Score
110. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
111. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
112. Will a Data binding production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
113. What was the context?
<--- Score
114. What would be the goal or target for a Data binding’s improvement team?
<--- Score
115. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
116. What Data binding services do you require?
<--- Score
117. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
118. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
119. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
120. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
121. How can the value of Data binding be defined?
<--- Score
122. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
123. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Data binding leverage and how?
<--- Score
124. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
125. Do you all define Data binding in the same way?
<--- Score
126. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
127. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
128. How do you manage changes in Data binding requirements?
<--- Score
129. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
130. Is Data binding currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
131. How do you catch Data binding definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
132. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
133. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Data binding goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
134. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Data binding Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
