Читать книгу Information Modelling A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are accountability and ownership for Information Modelling clearly defined?
<--- Score
2. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Information Modelling changes?
<--- Score
3. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information Modelling results are met?
<--- Score
4. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
5. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
6. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
7. Will a Information Modelling production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
8. Is there a clear Information Modelling case definition?
<--- Score
9. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
10. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
11. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
12. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
13. How are consistent Information Modelling definitions important?
<--- Score
14. What Information Modelling requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
15. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
16. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
17. Is special Information Modelling user knowledge required?
<--- Score
18. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
19. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
20. What system do you use for gathering Information Modelling information?
<--- Score
21. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
22. How do you gather Information Modelling requirements?
<--- Score
23. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information Modelling study?
<--- Score
24. When is/was the Information Modelling start date?
<--- Score
25. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
26. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
27. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Information Modelling brings?
<--- Score
28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
29. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
30. What was the context?
<--- Score
31. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information Modelling work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
32. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
33. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
34. Is Information Modelling linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
35. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
36. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information Modelling? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
37. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
38. What are the Information Modelling use cases?
<--- Score
39. Is the scope of Information Modelling defined?
<--- Score
40. How does the Information Modelling manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
41. How have you defined all Information Modelling requirements first?
<--- Score
42. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
43. What is the definition of Information Modelling excellence?
<--- Score
44. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
45. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
46. How do you hand over Information Modelling context?
<--- Score
47. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
48. Why are you doing Information Modelling and what is the scope?
<--- Score
49. What are (control) requirements for Information Modelling Information?
<--- Score
50. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
51. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
52. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
53. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
54. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
55. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
56. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
57. What would be the goal or target for a Information Modelling’s improvement team?
<--- Score
58. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
59. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
60. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
61. How would you define Information Modelling leadership?
<--- Score
62. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
63. How did the Information Modelling manager receive input to the development of a Information Modelling improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
64. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
65. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
66. What are the core elements of the Information Modelling business case?
<--- Score
67. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
69. What happens if Information Modelling’s scope changes?
<--- Score
70. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
72. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
73. What is the scope of the Information Modelling work?
<--- Score
74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information Modelling leverage and how?
<--- Score
75. Are the Information Modelling requirements testable?
<--- Score
76. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
77. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
78. Is there any additional Information Modelling definition of success?
<--- Score
79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
80. How will the Information Modelling team and the group measure complete success of Information Modelling?
<--- Score
81. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
82. How do you catch Information Modelling definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
83. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
84. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
85. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
86. Do you all define Information Modelling in the same way?
<--- Score
87. Has a Information Modelling requirement not been met?
<--- Score
88. Have all basic functions of Information Modelling been defined?
<--- Score
89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
91. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
92. How do you manage changes in Information Modelling requirements?
<--- Score
93. How do you manage unclear Information Modelling requirements?
<--- Score
94. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
95. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
96. What are the Information Modelling tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
97. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information Modelling?
<--- Score
98. Is there a critical path to deliver Information Modelling results?
<--- Score
99. Is the Information Modelling scope manageable?
<--- Score
100. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
101. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
102. How can the value of Information Modelling be defined?
<--- Score
103. Who approved the Information Modelling scope?
<--- Score
104. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
105. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
106. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
107. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
108. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
109. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
110. Who is gathering Information Modelling information?
<--- Score
111. Is the Information Modelling scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
112. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
113. Has the Information Modelling work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
114. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
115. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
116. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information Modelling activities?
<--- Score
117. How do you think the partners involved in Information Modelling would have defined success?
<--- Score
118. Is Information Modelling currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
119. What is the scope of Information Modelling?
<--- Score
120. Do you have a Information Modelling success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
121. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
122. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Information Modelling goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
123. What is in scope?
<--- Score
124. What Information Modelling services do you require?
<--- Score
125. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
126. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
127. What is the scope of the Information Modelling effort?
<--- Score
128. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
129. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
130. What gets examined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information Modelling Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
