Читать книгу Emergency Communication Systems A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
2. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
3. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
4. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
5. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
6. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
7. When is/was the Emergency communication systems start date?
<--- Score
8. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
9. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
10. What are (control) requirements for Emergency communication systems Information?
<--- Score
11. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
12. How will the Emergency communication systems team and the group measure complete success of Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
13. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
14. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
15. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
16. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
17. What is the scope of the Emergency communication systems work?
<--- Score
18. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Emergency communication systems goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
19. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
20. Who approved the Emergency communication systems scope?
<--- Score
21. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
22. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
23. Is Emergency communication systems linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
24. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
25. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
26. What Emergency communication systems services do you require?
<--- Score
27. How have you defined all Emergency communication systems requirements first?
<--- Score
28. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
29. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
30. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
31. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
32. What are the Emergency communication systems tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
33. How do you catch Emergency communication systems definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
34. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
35. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
36. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
37. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
38. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
39. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
40. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Emergency communication systems results are met?
<--- Score
41. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
42. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
43. How do you hand over Emergency communication systems context?
<--- Score
44. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Emergency communication systems changes?
<--- Score
45. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
46. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
47. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
48. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
49. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
50. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Emergency communication systems work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
51. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements complete?
<--- Score
52. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
53. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
54. Has a Emergency communication systems requirement not been met?
<--- Score
55. What is in scope?
<--- Score
56. Will a Emergency communication systems production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
57. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
58. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
59. Is special Emergency communication systems user knowledge required?
<--- Score
60. How would you define Emergency communication systems leadership?
<--- Score
61. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
62. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
63. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
64. How did the Emergency communication systems manager receive input to the development of a Emergency communication systems improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
65. Do you all define Emergency communication systems in the same way?
<--- Score
66. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency communication systems study?
<--- Score
67. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
68. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
69. Has the Emergency communication systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
70. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements testable?
<--- Score
71. What happens if Emergency communication systems’s scope changes?
<--- Score
72. What was the context?
<--- Score
73. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
74. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
75. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
76. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency communication systems results?
<--- Score
77. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
78. How does the Emergency communication systems manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. Are improvement team members fully trained on Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
80. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
81. How do you think the partners involved in Emergency communication systems would have defined success?
<--- Score
82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency communication systems work?
<--- Score
83. How do you manage changes in Emergency communication systems requirements?
<--- Score
84. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Emergency communication systems leverage and how?
<--- Score
86. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
87. Is the Emergency communication systems scope manageable?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Emergency communication systems excellence?
<--- Score
89. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
90. Is there a Emergency communication systems management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency communication systems brings?
<--- Score
92. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
93. Is the scope of Emergency communication systems defined?
<--- Score
94. What are the core elements of the Emergency communication systems business case?
<--- Score
95. Is the Emergency communication systems scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
96. What Emergency communication systems requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
97. Who are the Emergency communication systems improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
98. What gets examined?
<--- Score
99. What is the context?
<--- Score
100. What is the scope of the Emergency communication systems effort?
<--- Score
101. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
102. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
103. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
104. What system do you use for gathering Emergency communication systems information?
<--- Score
105. Is Emergency communication systems required?
<--- Score
106. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
107. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
108. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
109. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
110. What is the scope?
<--- Score
111. How do you manage unclear Emergency communication systems requirements?
<--- Score
112. Have all basic functions of Emergency communication systems been defined?
<--- Score
113. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
114. How are consistent Emergency communication systems definitions important?
<--- Score
115. Will team members perform Emergency communication systems work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
116. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
117. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
118. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
119. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
120. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
121. What would be the goal or target for a Emergency communication systems’s improvement team?
<--- Score
122. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
123. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
124. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
125. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
126. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
127. Who is gathering Emergency communication systems information?
<--- Score
128. Is there any additional Emergency communication systems definition of success?
<--- Score
129. How can the value of Emergency communication systems be defined?
<--- Score
130. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
131. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
132. What are the Emergency communication systems use cases?
<--- Score
133. What is the scope of Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
134. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
135. Do you have a Emergency communication systems success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
136. Is Emergency communication systems currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
137. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
138. What are the record-keeping requirements of Emergency communication systems activities?
<--- Score
139. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
140. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
141. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Emergency communication systems? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
142. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Emergency communication systems Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
