Читать книгу Method Of Analysis A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the scope?
<--- Score
2. Is special Method of analysis user knowledge required?
<--- Score
3. Is the scope of Method of analysis defined?
<--- Score
4. How did the Method of analysis manager receive input to the development of a Method of analysis improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
5. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
6. Is Method of analysis required?
<--- Score
7. What is the definition of Method of analysis excellence?
<--- Score
8. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
9. How do you manage unclear Method of analysis requirements?
<--- Score
10. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
11. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Method of analysis brings?
<--- Score
12. How do you gather Method of analysis requirements?
<--- Score
13. What is in scope?
<--- Score
14. What would be the goal or target for a Method of analysis’s improvement team?
<--- Score
15. What are the core elements of the Method of analysis business case?
<--- Score
16. Are the Method of analysis requirements complete?
<--- Score
17. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Method of analysis? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage changes in Method of analysis requirements?
<--- Score
19. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
20. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
21. Is the Method of analysis scope manageable?
<--- Score
22. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Method of analysis work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
23. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
24. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
25. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
26. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
27. What is the scope of the Method of analysis effort?
<--- Score
28. What Method of analysis services do you require?
<--- Score
29. What system do you use for gathering Method of analysis information?
<--- Score
30. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
31. Is there a critical path to deliver Method of analysis results?
<--- Score
32. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
33. Is the Method of analysis scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
34. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
35. How can the value of Method of analysis be defined?
<--- Score
36. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
37. How are consistent Method of analysis definitions important?
<--- Score
38. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
39. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
40. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
41. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
42. How will the Method of analysis team and the group measure complete success of Method of analysis?
<--- Score
43. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Method of analysis changes?
<--- Score
44. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
45. How have you defined all Method of analysis requirements first?
<--- Score
46. When is/was the Method of analysis start date?
<--- Score
47. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
48. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
49. How would you define Method of analysis leadership?
<--- Score
50. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
51. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
52. Is Method of analysis linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
53. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
54. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Method of analysis?
<--- Score
56. How do you hand over Method of analysis context?
<--- Score
57. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
58. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
59. What are the Method of analysis use cases?
<--- Score
60. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
61. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Method of analysis results are met?
<--- Score
62. Is Method of analysis currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
63. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
64. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
65. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
66. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
67. What is the scope of the Method of analysis work?
<--- Score
68. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Method of analysis leverage and how?
<--- Score
69. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Method of analysis improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. What happens if Method of analysis’s scope changes?
<--- Score
72. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
73. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
74. What are the record-keeping requirements of Method of analysis activities?
<--- Score
75. How does the Method of analysis manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
76. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
77. What Method of analysis requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
80. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
81. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
82. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
83. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
84. What gets examined?
<--- Score
85. What was the context?
<--- Score
86. What sources do you use to gather information for a Method of analysis study?
<--- Score
87. What is the context?
<--- Score
88. Will a Method of analysis production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
89. Is there any additional Method of analysis definition of success?
<--- Score
90. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
91. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
92. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
93. Has the Method of analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
94. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
95. Who is gathering Method of analysis information?
<--- Score
96. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
97. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
98. Are accountability and ownership for Method of analysis clearly defined?
<--- Score
99. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
100. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
101. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
102. Is there a clear Method of analysis case definition?
<--- Score
103. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
104. How do you catch Method of analysis definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
105. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
106. What are the Method of analysis tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
107. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
108. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Method of analysis goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
109. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
110. What is the scope of Method of analysis?
<--- Score
111. Is there a Method of analysis management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
112. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
113. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
114. Has a Method of analysis requirement not been met?
<--- Score
115. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
116. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
117. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
118. Have all basic functions of Method of analysis been defined?
<--- Score
119. Do you have a Method of analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
120. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
121. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
122. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
123. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
124. How do you think the partners involved in Method of analysis would have defined success?
<--- Score
125. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
126. Who approved the Method of analysis scope?
<--- Score
127. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
128. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
129. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
130. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
131. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Method of analysis Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
