Читать книгу Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 7
ОглавлениеCRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
2. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
3. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
4. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
5. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
6. Consider your own Scientific workflow management system project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
7. Do you need to avoid or amend any Scientific workflow management system activities?
<--- Score
8. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
9. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Scientific workflow management system will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
10. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
11. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
12. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
13. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
14. Are there recognized Scientific workflow management system problems?
<--- Score
15. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
16. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
17. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
18. What Scientific workflow management system capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
19. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
20. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
21. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
22. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
23. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
24. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
25. Why the need?
<--- Score
26. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Scientific workflow management system team, Scientific workflow management system itself?
<--- Score
27. When a Scientific workflow management system manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
28. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
29. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
30. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
31. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Scientific workflow management system? In other words, what are the risks, if Scientific workflow management system does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
32. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
33. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
34. What is the extent or complexity of the Scientific workflow management system problem?
<--- Score
35. What Scientific workflow management system events should you attend?
<--- Score
36. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Scientific workflow management system delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
37. How do you recognize an Scientific workflow management system objection?
<--- Score
38. Have you identified your Scientific workflow management system key performance indicators?
<--- Score
39. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
40. Do you know what you need to know about Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
41. Is it needed?
<--- Score
42. What information do users need?
<--- Score
43. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
44. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
45. What situation(s) led to this Scientific workflow management system Self Assessment?
<--- Score
46. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
47. What Scientific workflow management system problem should be solved?
<--- Score
48. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
49. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
50. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Scientific workflow management system research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
51. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
52. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
53. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
54. What vendors make products that address the Scientific workflow management system needs?
<--- Score
55. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Scientific workflow management system leader?
<--- Score
56. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
57. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
58. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
59. For your Scientific workflow management system project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
60. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
61. What Scientific workflow management system coordination do you need?
<--- Score
62. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Scientific workflow management system as an effective investment?
<--- Score
63. Which information does the Scientific workflow management system business case need to include?
<--- Score
64. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
65. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
66. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
67. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
68. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
69. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
70. What are the expected benefits of Scientific workflow management system to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
71. Does Scientific workflow management system create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
72. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
73. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
74. Will Scientific workflow management system deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
75. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
76. How do you assess your Scientific workflow management system workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
77. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
78. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
79. What are the Scientific workflow management system resources needed?
<--- Score
80. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
81. Think about the people you identified for your Scientific workflow management system project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
82. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
83. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
84. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
85. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
86. Did you miss any major Scientific workflow management system issues?
<--- Score
87. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
88. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
89. What would happen if Scientific workflow management system weren’t done?
<--- Score
90. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
91. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
92. What does Scientific workflow management system success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
93. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
94. What is the Scientific workflow management system problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
95. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
96. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
97. How are the Scientific workflow management system’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
98. Who should resolve the Scientific workflow management system issues?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Scientific workflow management system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
