Читать книгу Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9

Оглавление

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

<--- Score

2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

<--- Score

3. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

<--- Score

4. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

<--- Score

5. How is the value delivered by Scientific workflow management system being measured?

<--- Score

6. How sensitive must the Scientific workflow management system strategy be to cost?

<--- Score

7. Will Scientific workflow management system have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

<--- Score

8. What does your operating model cost?

<--- Score

9. What does losing customers cost your organization?

<--- Score

10. How do you verify and validate the Scientific workflow management system data?

<--- Score

11. How will costs be allocated?

<--- Score

12. What are the types and number of measures to use?

<--- Score

13. What do people want to verify?

<--- Score

14. What measurements are being captured?

<--- Score

15. Who pays the cost?

<--- Score

16. What do you measure and why?

<--- Score

17. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

<--- Score

18. What are the costs of delaying Scientific workflow management system action?

<--- Score

19. What users will be impacted?

<--- Score

20. What is the Scientific workflow management system business impact?

<--- Score

21. How is progress measured?

<--- Score

22. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

<--- Score

23. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

<--- Score

24. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

<--- Score

25. What are allowable costs?

<--- Score

26. How do you verify if Scientific workflow management system is built right?

<--- Score

27. How do your measurements capture actionable Scientific workflow management system information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

<--- Score

28. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

<--- Score

29. Is the solution cost-effective?

<--- Score

30. What could cause delays in the schedule?

<--- Score

31. At what cost?

<--- Score

32. Has a cost center been established?

<--- Score

33. What is the total cost related to deploying Scientific workflow management system, including any consulting or professional services?

<--- Score

34. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

<--- Score

35. What are the operational costs after Scientific workflow management system deployment?

<--- Score

36. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

<--- Score

37. How can you reduce costs?

<--- Score

38. Have you included everything in your Scientific workflow management system cost models?

<--- Score

39. How do you verify your resources?

<--- Score

40. What are your customers expectations and measures?

<--- Score

41. What are your operating costs?

<--- Score

42. How much does it cost?

<--- Score

43. How will success or failure be measured?

<--- Score

44. What is your decision requirements diagram?

<--- Score

45. What are the Scientific workflow management system investment costs?

<--- Score

46. Where is it measured?

<--- Score

47. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

<--- Score

48. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

<--- Score

49. Which Scientific workflow management system impacts are significant?

<--- Score

50. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

<--- Score

51. What drives O&M cost?

<--- Score

52. Is the cost worth the Scientific workflow management system effort ?

<--- Score

53. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

<--- Score

54. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

<--- Score

55. Does the Scientific workflow management system task fit the client’s priorities?

<--- Score

56. How do you verify the Scientific workflow management system requirements quality?

<--- Score

57. What does a Test Case verify?

<--- Score

58. How will you measure success?

<--- Score

59. What is measured? Why?

<--- Score

60. Are there competing Scientific workflow management system priorities?

<--- Score

61. What relevant entities could be measured?

<--- Score

62. What would it cost to replace your technology?

<--- Score

63. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?

<--- Score

64. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

<--- Score

65. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

<--- Score

66. What are you verifying?

<--- Score

67. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

<--- Score

68. How are measurements made?

<--- Score

69. How do you verify performance?

<--- Score

70. Among the Scientific workflow management system product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

<--- Score

71. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

<--- Score

72. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

<--- Score

73. What causes mismanagement?

<--- Score

74. Where can you go to verify the info?

<--- Score

75. Are the measurements objective?

<--- Score

76. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

<--- Score

77. What is the cause of any Scientific workflow management system gaps?

<--- Score

78. What could cause you to change course?

<--- Score

79. What are the costs of reform?

<--- Score

80. What tests verify requirements?

<--- Score

81. How do you measure lifecycle phases?

<--- Score

82. What evidence is there and what is measured?

<--- Score

83. What are the costs?

<--- Score

84. How are costs allocated?

<--- Score

85. How is performance measured?

<--- Score

86. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Scientific workflow management system services/products?

<--- Score

87. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

<--- Score

88. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

<--- Score

89. What are your key Scientific workflow management system organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

<--- Score

90. What are the Scientific workflow management system key cost drivers?

<--- Score

91. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

<--- Score

92. How to cause the change?

<--- Score

93. How will you measure your Scientific workflow management system effectiveness?

<--- Score

94. What are the current costs of the Scientific workflow management system process?

<--- Score

95. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

<--- Score

96. Do you have any cost Scientific workflow management system limitation requirements?

<--- Score

97. What is an unallowable cost?

<--- Score

98. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?

<--- Score

99. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

<--- Score

100. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

<--- Score

101. What are the costs and benefits?

<--- Score

102. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

<--- Score

103. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

<--- Score

104. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

<--- Score

105. Are there measurements based on task performance?

<--- Score

106. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

<--- Score

107. What can be used to verify compliance?

<--- Score

108. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

<--- Score

109. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

<--- Score

110. When are costs are incurred?

<--- Score

111. How do you verify Scientific workflow management system completeness and accuracy?

<--- Score

112. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Scientific workflow management system? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

<--- Score

113. What would be a real cause for concern?

<--- Score

114. What is the cost of rework?

<--- Score

115. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

<--- Score

116. How frequently do you track Scientific workflow management system measures?

<--- Score

117. What details are required of the Scientific workflow management system cost structure?

<--- Score

118. How do you measure efficient delivery of Scientific workflow management system services?

<--- Score

119. Which costs should be taken into account?

<--- Score

120. Are Scientific workflow management system vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

<--- Score

121. What does verifying compliance entail?

<--- Score

122. How can a Scientific workflow management system test verify your ideas or assumptions?

<--- Score

123. What causes investor action?

<--- Score

Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх