Читать книгу Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
3. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
4. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
5. How is the value delivered by Scientific workflow management system being measured?
<--- Score
6. How sensitive must the Scientific workflow management system strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
7. Will Scientific workflow management system have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
8. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
9. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
10. How do you verify and validate the Scientific workflow management system data?
<--- Score
11. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
12. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
13. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
14. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
15. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
16. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
17. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
18. What are the costs of delaying Scientific workflow management system action?
<--- Score
19. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
20. What is the Scientific workflow management system business impact?
<--- Score
21. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
22. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
23. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
24. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
25. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
26. How do you verify if Scientific workflow management system is built right?
<--- Score
27. How do your measurements capture actionable Scientific workflow management system information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
28. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
29. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
30. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
31. At what cost?
<--- Score
32. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
33. What is the total cost related to deploying Scientific workflow management system, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
34. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
35. What are the operational costs after Scientific workflow management system deployment?
<--- Score
36. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
37. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
38. Have you included everything in your Scientific workflow management system cost models?
<--- Score
39. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
40. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
41. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
42. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
43. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
44. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
45. What are the Scientific workflow management system investment costs?
<--- Score
46. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
47. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
48. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
49. Which Scientific workflow management system impacts are significant?
<--- Score
50. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
51. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
52. Is the cost worth the Scientific workflow management system effort ?
<--- Score
53. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
54. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
55. Does the Scientific workflow management system task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
56. How do you verify the Scientific workflow management system requirements quality?
<--- Score
57. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
58. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
59. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
60. Are there competing Scientific workflow management system priorities?
<--- Score
61. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
62. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
63. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
64. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
65. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
66. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
67. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
68. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
69. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
70. Among the Scientific workflow management system product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
71. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
72. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
73. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
74. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
75. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
76. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
77. What is the cause of any Scientific workflow management system gaps?
<--- Score
78. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
79. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
80. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
81. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
82. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
83. What are the costs?
<--- Score
84. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
85. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
86. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Scientific workflow management system services/products?
<--- Score
87. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
88. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
89. What are your key Scientific workflow management system organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
90. What are the Scientific workflow management system key cost drivers?
<--- Score
91. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
92. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
93. How will you measure your Scientific workflow management system effectiveness?
<--- Score
94. What are the current costs of the Scientific workflow management system process?
<--- Score
95. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
96. Do you have any cost Scientific workflow management system limitation requirements?
<--- Score
97. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
98. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
99. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
100. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
101. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
102. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
103. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
104. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
105. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
106. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
107. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
108. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
109. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
110. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
111. How do you verify Scientific workflow management system completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
112. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Scientific workflow management system? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
113. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
114. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
115. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
116. How frequently do you track Scientific workflow management system measures?
<--- Score
117. What details are required of the Scientific workflow management system cost structure?
<--- Score
118. How do you measure efficient delivery of Scientific workflow management system services?
<--- Score
119. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
120. Are Scientific workflow management system vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
121. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
122. How can a Scientific workflow management system test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
123. What causes investor action?
<--- Score