Читать книгу Design Engineering And Construction Services A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

<--- Score

2. At what cost?

<--- Score

3. What can be used to verify compliance?

<--- Score

4. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

<--- Score

5. What would be a real cause for concern?

<--- Score

6. How are you verifying it?

<--- Score

7. Where is the cost?

<--- Score

8. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

<--- Score

9. What are the costs of delaying Design Engineering and Construction Services action?

<--- Score

10. Does the Design Engineering and Construction Services task fit the client’s priorities?

<--- Score

11. How do you verify performance?

<--- Score

12. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

<--- Score

13. Who should receive measurement reports?

<--- Score

14. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

<--- Score

15. What potential environmental factors impact the Design Engineering and Construction Services effort?

<--- Score

16. What is the total cost related to deploying Design Engineering and Construction Services, including any consulting or professional services?

<--- Score

17. Are the Design Engineering and Construction Services benefits worth its costs?

<--- Score

18. What does a Test Case verify?

<--- Score

19. What are hidden Design Engineering and Construction Services quality costs?

<--- Score

20. What does your operating model cost?

<--- Score

21. Are missed Design Engineering and Construction Services opportunities costing your organization money?

<--- Score

22. What are the types and number of measures to use?

<--- Score

23. How are costs allocated?

<--- Score

24. Does a Design Engineering and Construction Services quantification method exist?

<--- Score

25. How will you measure success?

<--- Score

26. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

<--- Score

27. Is the cost worth the Design Engineering and Construction Services effort ?

<--- Score

28. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

<--- Score

29. Are the units of measure consistent?

<--- Score

30. How will effects be measured?

<--- Score

31. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

<--- Score

32. What is the cost of rework?

<--- Score

33. Is the solution cost-effective?

<--- Score

34. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

<--- Score

35. What does losing customers cost your organization?

<--- Score

36. Are Design Engineering and Construction Services vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

<--- Score

37. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

<--- Score

38. How do you verify if Design Engineering and Construction Services is built right?

<--- Score

39. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

<--- Score

40. What are the current costs of the Design Engineering and Construction Services process?

<--- Score

41. Which costs should be taken into account?

<--- Score

42. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

<--- Score

43. How sensitive must the Design Engineering and Construction Services strategy be to cost?

<--- Score

44. How do you verify Design Engineering and Construction Services completeness and accuracy?

<--- Score

45. What measurements are being captured?

<--- Score

46. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

<--- Score

47. How are measurements made?

<--- Score

48. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

<--- Score

49. What is the Design Engineering and Construction Services business impact?

<--- Score

50. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

<--- Score

51. How can you manage cost down?

<--- Score

52. Will Design Engineering and Construction Services have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

<--- Score

53. What is measured? Why?

<--- Score

54. How do you verify and validate the Design Engineering and Construction Services data?

<--- Score

55. Where is it measured?

<--- Score

56. What causes extra work or rework?

<--- Score

57. What users will be impacted?

<--- Score

58. How do your measurements capture actionable Design Engineering and Construction Services information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

<--- Score

59. Are there competing Design Engineering and Construction Services priorities?

<--- Score

60. What are the costs and benefits?

<--- Score

61. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

<--- Score

62. How do you measure efficient delivery of Design Engineering and Construction Services services?

<--- Score

63. What evidence is there and what is measured?

<--- Score

64. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

<--- Score

65. How do you measure success?

<--- Score

66. Which Design Engineering and Construction Services impacts are significant?

<--- Score

67. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

<--- Score

68. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

<--- Score

69. What is your decision requirements diagram?

<--- Score

70. What causes mismanagement?

<--- Score

71. How will your organization measure success?

<--- Score

72. What details are required of the Design Engineering and Construction Services cost structure?

<--- Score

73. What could cause you to change course?

<--- Score

74. Are indirect costs charged to the Design Engineering and Construction Services program?

<--- Score

75. How will success or failure be measured?

<--- Score

76. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

<--- Score

77. How do you measure variability?

<--- Score

78. What is an unallowable cost?

<--- Score

79. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Design Engineering and Construction Services? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

<--- Score

80. Why a Design Engineering and Construction Services focus?

<--- Score

81. What is the total fixed cost?

<--- Score

82. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Design Engineering and Construction Services services/products?

<--- Score

83. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

<--- Score

84. What are the costs?

<--- Score

85. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

<--- Score

86. Where can you go to verify the info?

<--- Score

87. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?

<--- Score

88. What would it cost to replace your technology?

<--- Score

89. How do you measure lifecycle phases?

<--- Score

90. How can a Design Engineering and Construction Services test verify your ideas or assumptions?

<--- Score

91. What is the cause of any Design Engineering and Construction Services gaps?

<--- Score

92. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

<--- Score

93. What are you verifying?

<--- Score

94. How is performance measured?

<--- Score

95. What are the Design Engineering and Construction Services investment costs?

<--- Score

96. Among the Design Engineering and Construction Services product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

<--- Score

97. Are there measurements based on task performance?

<--- Score

98. What could cause delays in the schedule?

<--- Score

99. How can you measure the performance?

<--- Score

100. How much does it cost?

<--- Score

101. Are the measurements objective?

<--- Score

102. What harm might be caused?

<--- Score

103. How frequently do you verify your Design Engineering and Construction Services strategy?

<--- Score

104. What are the costs of reform?

<--- Score

105. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

<--- Score

106. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

<--- Score

107. What causes investor action?

<--- Score

108. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

<--- Score

109. The approach of traditional Design Engineering and Construction Services works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

<--- Score

110. What is your Design Engineering and Construction Services quality cost segregation study?

<--- Score

111. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

<--- Score

112. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

<--- Score

113. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

<--- Score

114. What are your key Design Engineering and Construction Services organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

<--- Score

115. How do you verify the Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements quality?

<--- Score

116. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

<--- Score

117. Do you have any cost Design Engineering and Construction Services limitation requirements?

<--- Score