Читать книгу Network Appliance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you gather Network appliance requirements?
<--- Score
2. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
3. Is there a clear Network appliance case definition?
<--- Score
4. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
5. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
6. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
7. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
8. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
9. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
10. Do you all define Network appliance in the same way?
<--- Score
11. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
12. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
13. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
14. How will the Network appliance team and the group measure complete success of Network appliance?
<--- Score
15. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
16. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
17. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
19. Do you have a Network appliance success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
20. What is the context?
<--- Score
21. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
22. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
23. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Network appliance leverage and how?
<--- Score
24. Is special Network appliance user knowledge required?
<--- Score
25. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
26. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
27. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
28. How have you defined all Network appliance requirements first?
<--- Score
29. What is the scope of the Network appliance work?
<--- Score
30. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
31. Will team members perform Network appliance work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
32. What is in scope?
<--- Score
33. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
34. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
35. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
36. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
37. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
38. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
39. What are the core elements of the Network appliance business case?
<--- Score
40. How did the Network appliance manager receive input to the development of a Network appliance improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
41. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
42. What is the definition of Network appliance excellence?
<--- Score
43. Are improvement team members fully trained on Network appliance?
<--- Score
44. Is Network appliance currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
45. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
46. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
47. How do you manage unclear Network appliance requirements?
<--- Score
48. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
49. When is/was the Network appliance start date?
<--- Score
50. How do you catch Network appliance definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
51. How do you hand over Network appliance context?
<--- Score
52. Why are you doing Network appliance and what is the scope?
<--- Score
53. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
54. Will team members regularly document their Network appliance work?
<--- Score
55. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
56. Is there any additional Network appliance definition of success?
<--- Score
57. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
58. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
59. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
60. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
61. Who are the Network appliance improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
62. What are the Network appliance use cases?
<--- Score
63. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
64. Are accountability and ownership for Network appliance clearly defined?
<--- Score
65. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
66. How do you think the partners involved in Network appliance would have defined success?
<--- Score
67. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
68. How does the Network appliance manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
69. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
70. How do you manage changes in Network appliance requirements?
<--- Score
71. What are the record-keeping requirements of Network appliance activities?
<--- Score
72. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
73. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
74. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
75. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
76. Is the scope of Network appliance defined?
<--- Score
77. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Network appliance changes?
<--- Score
78. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
79. What Network appliance services do you require?
<--- Score
80. How are consistent Network appliance definitions important?
<--- Score
81. What Network appliance requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
83. What sources do you use to gather information for a Network appliance study?
<--- Score
84. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
85. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
86. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
87. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
88. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
89. Has a Network appliance requirement not been met?
<--- Score
90. Who approved the Network appliance scope?
<--- Score
91. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Network appliance results are met?
<--- Score
92. What are the Network appliance tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
93. What would be the goal or target for a Network appliance’s improvement team?
<--- Score
94. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
95. Is the Network appliance scope manageable?
<--- Score
96. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Network appliance?
<--- Score
97. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
98. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
99. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
100. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
101. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
102. What are (control) requirements for Network appliance Information?
<--- Score
103. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Network appliance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
104. Are the Network appliance requirements testable?
<--- Score
105. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
106. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Network appliance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
107. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
108. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Network appliance brings?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of Network appliance?
<--- Score
110. Has the Network appliance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
111. Are the Network appliance requirements complete?
<--- Score
112. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
113. Is Network appliance required?
<--- Score
114. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
115. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
116. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
117. Is Network appliance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
118. What was the context?
<--- Score
119. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Network appliance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
120. Is there a critical path to deliver Network appliance results?
<--- Score
121. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
122. Who is gathering Network appliance information?
<--- Score
123. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
124. How would you define Network appliance leadership?
<--- Score
125. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
126. Is there a Network appliance management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
127. Have all basic functions of Network appliance been defined?
<--- Score
128. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
129. Is the Network appliance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
130. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
131. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
132. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
133. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Network appliance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
