Читать книгу High Finance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 7
ОглавлениеCRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
2. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with High Finance?
<--- Score
3. Which information does the High Finance business case need to include?
<--- Score
4. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying High Finance research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
5. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
6. What vendors make products that address the High Finance needs?
<--- Score
7. Does your organization need more High Finance education?
<--- Score
8. What information do users need?
<--- Score
9. Who should resolve the High Finance issues?
<--- Score
10. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize High Finance as an effective investment?
<--- Score
11. What situation(s) led to this High Finance Self Assessment?
<--- Score
12. Consider your own High Finance project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
13. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
14. Is it needed?
<--- Score
15. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
16. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
17. What are the High Finance resources needed?
<--- Score
18. Does High Finance create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
19. What problems are you facing and how do you consider High Finance will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
20. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
21. What would happen if High Finance weren’t done?
<--- Score
22. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
23. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
24. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
25. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
26. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
27. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
28. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
29. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
30. Think about the people you identified for your High Finance project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
31. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
32. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
33. Do you need to avoid or amend any High Finance activities?
<--- Score
34. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
35. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
36. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
37. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
38. Are there recognized High Finance problems?
<--- Score
39. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
40. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
41. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
42. Will High Finance deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
43. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective High Finance leader?
<--- Score
44. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
45. What High Finance coordination do you need?
<--- Score
46. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
47. What High Finance problem should be solved?
<--- Score
48. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
49. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
50. Do you know what you need to know about High Finance?
<--- Score
51. How are the High Finance’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
52. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
53. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
54. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
55. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
56. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
57. What is the High Finance problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
58. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
59. What is the extent or complexity of the High Finance problem?
<--- Score
60. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in High Finance? In other words, what are the risks, if High Finance does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
61. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
62. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
63. Who needs to know about High Finance?
<--- Score
64. How do you recognize an High Finance objection?
<--- Score
65. When a High Finance manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
66. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
67. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
68. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
69. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
70. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
71. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
72. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
73. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
74. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
75. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
76. What are the expected benefits of High Finance to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
77. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the High Finance team, High Finance itself?
<--- Score
78. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
79. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
80. What are your needs in relation to High Finance skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
81. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
82. For your High Finance project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
83. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
84. What does High Finance success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
85. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
86. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
87. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
88. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
89. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
90. Have you identified your High Finance key performance indicators?
<--- Score
91. How do you assess your High Finance workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
92. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate High Finance delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
93. What High Finance events should you attend?
<--- Score
94. Did you miss any major High Finance issues?
<--- Score
95. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of High Finance?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the High Finance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
