Читать книгу Home Review A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
2. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
3. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
4. What Home Review services do you require?
<--- Score
5. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
6. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
7. How do you hand over Home Review context?
<--- Score
8. Who are the Home Review improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
9. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
10. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
11. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
12. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
13. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
14. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
15. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
16. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
17. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
18. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
19. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Home Review results are met?
<--- Score
20. How do you think the partners involved in Home Review would have defined success?
<--- Score
21. What Home Review requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
22. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
23. What was the context?
<--- Score
24. Is the Home Review scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
25. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
26. Is there a critical path to deliver Home Review results?
<--- Score
27. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
28. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
29. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
30. Are the Home Review requirements testable?
<--- Score
31. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
32. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
33. What is the scope of the Home Review work?
<--- Score
34. What would be the goal or target for a Home Review’s improvement team?
<--- Score
35. Is Home Review currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
36. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
37. How do you manage changes in Home Review requirements?
<--- Score
38. What are (control) requirements for Home Review Information?
<--- Score
39. What is the context?
<--- Score
40. What is the definition of Home Review excellence?
<--- Score
41. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
42. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
43. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
44. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
45. Is there any additional Home Review definition of success?
<--- Score
46. What happens if Home Review’s scope changes?
<--- Score
47. Are accountability and ownership for Home Review clearly defined?
<--- Score
48. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
49. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
50. Is the Home Review scope manageable?
<--- Score
51. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Home Review? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
52. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
53. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
54. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
55. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
56. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Home Review work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
57. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Home Review leverage and how?
<--- Score
58. Is there a clear Home Review case definition?
<--- Score
59. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
60. What sources do you use to gather information for a Home Review study?
<--- Score
61. Is Home Review required?
<--- Score
62. Has a Home Review requirement not been met?
<--- Score
63. What is the scope of the Home Review effort?
<--- Score
64. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
65. What is the scope?
<--- Score
66. Have all basic functions of Home Review been defined?
<--- Score
67. Are the Home Review requirements complete?
<--- Score
68. What are the Home Review use cases?
<--- Score
69. Has the Home Review work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
70. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Home Review goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
71. How have you defined all Home Review requirements first?
<--- Score
72. What are the Home Review tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
73. Is there a Home Review management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
74. Did your organization achieve its vision in outsourcing case management?
<--- Score
75. How do you manage unclear Home Review requirements?
<--- Score
76. How does the Home Review manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
77. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
78. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
79. How would you define Home Review leadership?
<--- Score
80. Do you have a Home Review success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
81. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Home Review?
<--- Score
82. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
83. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
84. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
85. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
86. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Home Review changes?
<--- Score
87. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
88. Why are you doing Home Review and what is the scope?
<--- Score
89. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
90. What are the core elements of the Home Review business case?
<--- Score
91. When is/was the Home Review start date?
<--- Score
92. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
93. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
94. Is special Home Review user knowledge required?
<--- Score
95. How did the Home Review manager receive input to the development of a Home Review improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
96. What are the record-keeping requirements of Home Review activities?
<--- Score
97. How do you gather Home Review requirements?
<--- Score
98. Who approved the Home Review scope?
<--- Score
99. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
100. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
101. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
102. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
103. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
104. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
105. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
106. Will a Home Review production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
107. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
108. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
109. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
110. How do you catch Home Review definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
111. Is the scope of Home Review defined?
<--- Score
112. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
113. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
114. How will the Home Review team and the group measure complete success of Home Review?
<--- Score
115. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
116. What is the scope of Home Review?
<--- Score
117. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
118. Who is gathering Home Review information?
<--- Score
119. Is Home Review linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
120. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
121. What system do you use for gathering Home Review information?
<--- Score
122. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
123. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
124. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Home Review brings?
<--- Score
125. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
126. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
127. How can the value of Home Review be defined?
<--- Score
128. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
129. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
130. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
131. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
132. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
133. Do you all define Home Review in the same way?
<--- Score
134. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
135. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
136. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Home Review Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
