Читать книгу Stakeholder Engagement Software A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
2. Are the Stakeholder engagement software requirements complete?
<--- Score
3. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
4. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
5. What are the Stakeholder engagement software use cases?
<--- Score
6. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
7. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
8. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
9. When is/was the Stakeholder engagement software start date?
<--- Score
10. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
11. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
12. Do you all define Stakeholder engagement software in the same way?
<--- Score
13. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Stakeholder engagement software results are met?
<--- Score
14. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
15. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
16. What are the record-keeping requirements of Stakeholder engagement software activities?
<--- Score
17. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Stakeholder engagement software brings?
<--- Score
18. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Stakeholder engagement software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
19. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
20. How do you gather Stakeholder engagement software requirements?
<--- Score
21. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
22. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
23. Who are the Stakeholder engagement software improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
24. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
25. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
26. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
27. How will the Stakeholder engagement software team and the group measure complete success of Stakeholder engagement software?
<--- Score
28. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
29. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
30. Why are you doing Stakeholder engagement software and what is the scope?
<--- Score
31. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
32. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
33. Who approved the Stakeholder engagement software scope?
<--- Score
34. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
35. Is the scope of Stakeholder engagement software defined?
<--- Score
36. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
37. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
38. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
39. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
40. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
41. What is the context?
<--- Score
42. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
43. Has the Stakeholder engagement software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
44. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
45. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
46. Who is gathering Stakeholder engagement software information?
<--- Score
47. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
48. What Stakeholder engagement software requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
49. How did the Stakeholder engagement software manager receive input to the development of a Stakeholder engagement software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
50. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
51. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
52. Is Stakeholder engagement software linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
53. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
54. What is the scope of Stakeholder engagement software?
<--- Score
55. Is Stakeholder engagement software required?
<--- Score
56. How have you defined all Stakeholder engagement software requirements first?
<--- Score
57. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
58. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
59. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
60. Are accountability and ownership for Stakeholder engagement software clearly defined?
<--- Score
61. What was the context?
<--- Score
62. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
63. What are the Stakeholder engagement software tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
64. How do you manage unclear Stakeholder engagement software requirements?
<--- Score
65. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
66. What is in scope?
<--- Score
67. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
68. What is the definition of Stakeholder engagement software excellence?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of the Stakeholder engagement software work?
<--- Score
70. What is the scope of the Stakeholder engagement software effort?
<--- Score
71. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
72. What would be the goal or target for a Stakeholder engagement software’s improvement team?
<--- Score
73. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
74. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
75. How do you catch Stakeholder engagement software definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
76. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
77. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
78. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Stakeholder engagement software changes?
<--- Score
79. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
80. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
81. What sources do you use to gather information for a Stakeholder engagement software study?
<--- Score
82. Have all basic functions of Stakeholder engagement software been defined?
<--- Score
83. Is there any additional Stakeholder engagement software definition of success?
<--- Score
84. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
85. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
86. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
87. Is there a critical path to deliver Stakeholder engagement software results?
<--- Score
88. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
89. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Stakeholder engagement software leverage and how?
<--- Score
90. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
91. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
92. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
93. Has a Stakeholder engagement software requirement not been met?
<--- Score
94. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
95. How can the value of Stakeholder engagement software be defined?
<--- Score
96. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
97. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
98. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
99. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Stakeholder engagement software?
<--- Score
100. Do you have a Stakeholder engagement software success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
101. Is there a clear Stakeholder engagement software case definition?
<--- Score
102. Are the Stakeholder engagement software requirements testable?
<--- Score
103. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
104. How do you hand over Stakeholder engagement software context?
<--- Score
105. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
106. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
107. Will a Stakeholder engagement software production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
108. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
109. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
110. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
111. How do you manage changes in Stakeholder engagement software requirements?
<--- Score
112. Is the Stakeholder engagement software scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
113. What Stakeholder engagement software services do you require?
<--- Score
114. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Stakeholder engagement software work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
115. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
116. Is the Stakeholder engagement software scope manageable?
<--- Score
117. What are (control) requirements for Stakeholder engagement software Information?
<--- Score
118. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
119. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
120. How do you think the partners involved in Stakeholder engagement software would have defined success?
<--- Score
121. How does the Stakeholder engagement software manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
122. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
123. What system do you use for gathering Stakeholder engagement software information?
<--- Score
124. What happens if Stakeholder engagement software’s scope changes?
<--- Score
125. How are consistent Stakeholder engagement software definitions important?
<--- Score
126. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
127. Is special Stakeholder engagement software user knowledge required?
<--- Score
128. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Stakeholder engagement software? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
129. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
130. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
131. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
132. Is Stakeholder engagement software currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Stakeholder engagement software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
