Читать книгу Managed Content As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

Оглавление

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<--- Score

2. What Managed Content as a Service requirements should be gathered?

<--- Score

3. What are (control) requirements for Managed Content as a Service Information?

<--- Score

4. What are the Managed Content as a Service use cases?

<--- Score

5. Has your scope been defined?

<--- Score

6. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

7. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

8. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

<--- Score

9. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Managed Content as a Service? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

10. How do you manage scope?

<--- Score

11. What is the scope of the Managed Content as a Service effort?

<--- Score

12. What system do you use for gathering Managed Content as a Service information?

<--- Score

13. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<--- Score

14. Has the Managed Content as a Service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

15. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Managed Content as a Service work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

16. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

17. Will a Managed Content as a Service production readiness review be required?

<--- Score

18. The political context: who holds power?

<--- Score

19. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

20. Are the Managed Content as a Service requirements testable?

<--- Score

21. Does the scope remain the same?

<--- Score

22. What Managed Content as a Service services do you require?

<--- Score

23. What would be the goal or target for a Managed Content as a Service’s improvement team?

<--- Score

24. What is the scope?

<--- Score

25. How does the Managed Content as a Service manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

26. What are the requirements for audit information?

<--- Score

27. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

<--- Score

28. What are the record-keeping requirements of Managed Content as a Service activities?

<--- Score

29. How will the Managed Content as a Service team and the group measure complete success of Managed Content as a Service?

<--- Score

30. What is the scope of Managed Content as a Service?

<--- Score

31. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<--- Score

32. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

33. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

34. How do you catch Managed Content as a Service definition inconsistencies?

<--- Score

35. What was the context?

<--- Score

36. How can the value of Managed Content as a Service be defined?

<--- Score

37. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

38. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

39. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<--- Score

40. How have you defined all Managed Content as a Service requirements first?

<--- Score

41. Will team members regularly document their Managed Content as a Service work?

<--- Score

42. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

43. Are all requirements met?

<--- Score

44. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

45. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

46. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<--- Score

47. What happens if Managed Content as a Service’s scope changes?

<--- Score

48. What intelligence can you gather?

<--- Score

49. How do you gather the stories?

<--- Score

50. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Managed Content as a Service leverage and how?

<--- Score

51. Who is gathering Managed Content as a Service information?

<--- Score

52. Who approved the Managed Content as a Service scope?

<--- Score

53. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

<--- Score

54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

55. What is out of scope?

<--- Score

56. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Managed Content as a Service?

<--- Score

57. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

58. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<--- Score

59. Do you have a Managed Content as a Service success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

60. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

61. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

<--- Score

62. What is the worst case scenario?

<--- Score

63. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Managed Content as a Service changes?

<--- Score

64. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

65. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

66. Is the Managed Content as a Service scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

67. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

68. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

69. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

<--- Score

70. Is special Managed Content as a Service user knowledge required?

<--- Score

71. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<--- Score

72. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

73. Is Managed Content as a Service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

74. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Managed Content as a Service results are met?

<--- Score

75. What are the core elements of the Managed Content as a Service business case?

<--- Score

76. What is the definition of Managed Content as a Service excellence?

<--- Score

77. Is there a critical path to deliver Managed Content as a Service results?

<--- Score

78. How do you gather Managed Content as a Service requirements?

<--- Score

79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<--- Score

80. What is the scope of the Managed Content as a Service work?

<--- Score

81. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

82. What are the Managed Content as a Service tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

83. What is out-of-scope initially?

<--- Score

84. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

<--- Score

85. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<--- Score

86. What information should you gather?

<--- Score

87. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

88. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

89. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<--- Score

90. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Managed Content as a Service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

91. Is Managed Content as a Service currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

92. Why are you doing Managed Content as a Service and what is the scope?

<--- Score

93. When is/was the Managed Content as a Service start date?

<--- Score

94. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<--- Score

95. How did the Managed Content as a Service manager receive input to the development of a Managed Content as a Service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

96. What sort of initial information to gather?

<--- Score

97. Have all basic functions of Managed Content as a Service been defined?

<--- Score

98. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

<--- Score

99. What is the definition of success?

<--- Score

100. How do you manage unclear Managed Content as a Service requirements?

<--- Score

101. Are accountability and ownership for Managed Content as a Service clearly defined?

<--- Score

102. Is there a Managed Content as a Service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

<--- Score

103. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Managed Content as a Service brings?

<--- Score

104. Is there a clear Managed Content as a Service case definition?

<--- Score

105. Are improvement team members fully trained on Managed Content as a Service?

<--- Score

106. What is in scope?

<--- Score

107. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<--- Score

108. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

109. What sources do you use to gather information for a Managed Content as a Service study?

<--- Score

110. Is the scope of Managed Content as a Service defined?

<--- Score

111. Will team members perform Managed Content as a Service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

<--- Score

112. How do you hand over Managed Content as a Service context?

<--- Score

113. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

114. How do you think the partners involved in Managed Content as a Service would have defined success?

<--- Score

115. How do you gather requirements?

<--- Score

116. Where can you gather more information?

<--- Score

117. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

118. How do you build the right business case?

<--- Score

119. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

120. Who are the Managed Content as a Service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

121. How are consistent Managed Content as a Service definitions important?

<--- Score

122. Is there any additional Managed Content as a Service definition of success?

<--- Score

123. What is the context?

<--- Score

124. What knowledge or experience is required?

<--- Score

125. Are the Managed Content as a Service requirements complete?

<--- Score

126. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<--- Score

127. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

128. How do you manage changes in Managed Content as a Service requirements?

<--- Score

129. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

130. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

131. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

132. Is the Managed Content as a Service scope manageable?

<--- Score

133. What gets examined?

<--- Score

134. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

135. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

136. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

137. What information do you gather?

<--- Score

138. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<--- Score

139. Is Managed Content as a Service required?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Managed Content as a Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Managed Content As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх