Читать книгу Network Transparency A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

Оглавление

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How do you gather requirements?

<--- Score

2. Has the Network transparency work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

3. Who is gathering information?

<--- Score

4. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

<--- Score

5. How did the Network transparency manager receive input to the development of a Network transparency improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

6. Are accountability and ownership for Network transparency clearly defined?

<--- Score

7. What Network transparency services do you require?

<--- Score

8. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Network transparency results are met?

<--- Score

9. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<--- Score

10. What is the scope of the Network transparency work?

<--- Score

11. What information should you gather?

<--- Score

12. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<--- Score

13. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

14. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<--- Score

15. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

16. How can the value of Network transparency be defined?

<--- Score

17. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

18. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<--- Score

19. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Network transparency? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

20. How are consistent Network transparency definitions important?

<--- Score

21. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<--- Score

22. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

23. What is the definition of success?

<--- Score

24. What is out-of-scope initially?

<--- Score

25. How do you hand over Network transparency context?

<--- Score

26. How have you defined all Network transparency requirements first?

<--- Score

27. How would you define Network transparency leadership?

<--- Score

28. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

29. How do you manage unclear Network transparency requirements?

<--- Score

30. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Network transparency brings?

<--- Score

31. What was the context?

<--- Score

32. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

33. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

34. How do you gather the stories?

<--- Score

35. Have all basic functions of Network transparency been defined?

<--- Score

36. How do you catch Network transparency definition inconsistencies?

<--- Score

37. Who approved the Network transparency scope?

<--- Score

38. Are the Network transparency requirements testable?

<--- Score

39. What are the tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

40. What system do you use for gathering Network transparency information?

<--- Score

41. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

42. Do you all define Network transparency in the same way?

<--- Score

43. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<--- Score

44. Is Network transparency required?

<--- Score

45. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

46. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Network transparency work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

47. What are (control) requirements for Network transparency Information?

<--- Score

48. Is special Network transparency user knowledge required?

<--- Score

49. What is in scope?

<--- Score

50. What are the requirements for audit information?

<--- Score

51. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

52. Where can you gather more information?

<--- Score

53. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

54. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Network transparency?

<--- Score

56. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<--- Score

57. What are the Network transparency tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

58. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

59. How will the Network transparency team and the group measure complete success of Network transparency?

<--- Score

60. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

61. What is the scope?

<--- Score

62. What is the definition of Network transparency excellence?

<--- Score

63. Has your scope been defined?

<--- Score

64. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

65. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

66. How do you think the partners involved in Network transparency would have defined success?

<--- Score

67. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

68. Is Network transparency linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

69. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

<--- Score

70. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Network transparency goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

71. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

72. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Network transparency leverage and how?

<--- Score

73. Is there a critical path to deliver Network transparency results?

<--- Score

74. What sort of initial information to gather?

<--- Score

75. When is/was the Network transparency start date?

<--- Score

76. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

77. What would be the goal or target for a Network transparency’s improvement team?

<--- Score

78. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

79. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<--- Score

80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

81. Who are the Network transparency improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

82. What is the worst case scenario?

<--- Score

83. How do you gather Network transparency requirements?

<--- Score

84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

85. Is Network transparency currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

86. How do you build the right business case?

<--- Score

87. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<--- Score

88. Is the scope of Network transparency defined?

<--- Score

89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

90. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<--- Score

91. What are the core elements of the Network transparency business case?

<--- Score

92. What gets examined?

<--- Score

93. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

94. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

95. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

96. What Network transparency requirements should be gathered?

<--- Score

97. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

98. What happens if Network transparency’s scope changes?

<--- Score

99. Who is gathering Network transparency information?

<--- Score

100. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<--- Score

101. Is there a Network transparency management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

<--- Score

102. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<--- Score

103. Does the scope remain the same?

<--- Score

104. Why are you doing Network transparency and what is the scope?

<--- Score

105. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<--- Score

106. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Network transparency changes?

<--- Score

107. Is the Network transparency scope manageable?

<--- Score

108. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

109. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

110. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

<--- Score

111. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

112. What sources do you use to gather information for a Network transparency study?

<--- Score

113. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<--- Score

114. Is the Network transparency scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

115. Will a Network transparency production readiness review be required?

<--- Score

116. What intelligence can you gather?

<--- Score

117. Do you have a Network transparency success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

118. Has a Network transparency requirement not been met?

<--- Score

119. What is the scope of Network transparency?

<--- Score

120. What is the context?

<--- Score

121. Scope of sensitive information?

<--- Score

122. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

123. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<--- Score

124. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

125. Are the Network transparency requirements complete?

<--- Score

126. Is there any additional Network transparency definition of success?

<--- Score

127. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

<--- Score

128. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

<--- Score

129. How does the Network transparency manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

130. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

131. What is out of scope?

<--- Score

132. The political context: who holds power?

<--- Score

133. Is there a clear Network transparency case definition?

<--- Score

134. Are all requirements met?

<--- Score

135. How do you manage changes in Network transparency requirements?

<--- Score

136. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Network transparency Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Network Transparency A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх