Читать книгу Process Isolation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
2. How would you define Process isolation leadership?
<--- Score
3. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
4. Is Process isolation linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
5. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
6. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
7. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
8. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
9. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
10. What Process isolation requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
11. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
12. Are the Process isolation requirements complete?
<--- Score
13. Why are you doing Process isolation and what is the scope?
<--- Score
14. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
15. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Process isolation?
<--- Score
16. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
17. What are (control) requirements for Process isolation Information?
<--- Score
18. What Process isolation services do you require?
<--- Score
19. Is special Process isolation user knowledge required?
<--- Score
20. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Process isolation leverage and how?
<--- Score
21. Will team members perform Process isolation work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
22. What would be the goal or target for a Process isolation’s improvement team?
<--- Score
23. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
24. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
25. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
26. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
27. Is there a clear Process isolation case definition?
<--- Score
28. Who approved the Process isolation scope?
<--- Score
29. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
30. Who is gathering Process isolation information?
<--- Score
31. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
32. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
33. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
34. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
35. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
36. How do you manage changes in Process isolation requirements?
<--- Score
37. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
38. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
39. Who are the Process isolation improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
40. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
41. What is the definition of Process isolation excellence?
<--- Score
42. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
43. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
44. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
45. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Process isolation work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
46. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
47. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
48. Is Process isolation required?
<--- Score
49. Has a Process isolation requirement not been met?
<--- Score
50. How have you defined all Process isolation requirements first?
<--- Score
51. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
52. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
53. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Process isolation changes?
<--- Score
54. Have all basic functions of Process isolation been defined?
<--- Score
55. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
56. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
57. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
58. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
59. What is the context?
<--- Score
60. How did the Process isolation manager receive input to the development of a Process isolation improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
61. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
62. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
63. How do you think the partners involved in Process isolation would have defined success?
<--- Score
64. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
65. How do you hand over Process isolation context?
<--- Score
66. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
67. Do you have a Process isolation success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
68. Is the scope of Process isolation defined?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of the Process isolation work?
<--- Score
70. What gets examined?
<--- Score
71. Has the Process isolation work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
72. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
73. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
74. Is the Process isolation scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
75. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
76. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
77. What sources do you use to gather information for a Process isolation study?
<--- Score
78. Are improvement team members fully trained on Process isolation?
<--- Score
79. Is Process isolation currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
80. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
81. Is there a critical path to deliver Process isolation results?
<--- Score
82. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
83. How can the value of Process isolation be defined?
<--- Score
84. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
85. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
86. What is in scope?
<--- Score
87. What is the scope of Process isolation?
<--- Score
88. Will a Process isolation production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
89. Are accountability and ownership for Process isolation clearly defined?
<--- Score
90. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
91. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
92. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
93. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
94. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
95. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
96. How are consistent Process isolation definitions important?
<--- Score
97. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
98. How do you gather Process isolation requirements?
<--- Score
99. Is there any additional Process isolation definition of success?
<--- Score
100. How will the Process isolation team and the group measure complete success of Process isolation?
<--- Score
101. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Process isolation? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
102. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
103. What system do you use for gathering Process isolation information?
<--- Score
104. Do you all define Process isolation in the same way?
<--- Score
105. What are the Process isolation use cases?
<--- Score
106. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
107. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
108. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
109. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
110. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
111. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
112. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
113. When is/was the Process isolation start date?
<--- Score
114. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
115. What are the Process isolation tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
116. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
117. What happens if Process isolation’s scope changes?
<--- Score
118. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
119. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
120. Is there a Process isolation management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
121. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
122. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
123. How does the Process isolation manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
124. Will team members regularly document their Process isolation work?
<--- Score
125. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
126. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
127. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
128. What are the core elements of the Process isolation business case?
<--- Score
129. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
130. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
131. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
132. What is the scope of the Process isolation effort?
<--- Score
133. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
134. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
135. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Process isolation results are met?
<--- Score
136. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Process isolation brings?
<--- Score
137. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Process isolation goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
138. What was the context?
<--- Score
139. How do you manage unclear Process isolation requirements?
<--- Score
140. Is the Process isolation scope manageable?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Process isolation Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
