Читать книгу Systems Architecture Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9

Оглавление

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How are costs allocated?

<--- Score

2. Has a cost center been established?

<--- Score

3. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

<--- Score

4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

<--- Score

5. Is the solution cost-effective?

<--- Score

6. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

<--- Score

7. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Systems Architecture Service results?

<--- Score

8. What causes investor action?

<--- Score

9. How sensitive must the Systems Architecture Service strategy be to cost?

<--- Score

10. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

<--- Score

11. Is the cost worth the Systems Architecture Service effort ?

<--- Score

12. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

<--- Score

13. How do you verify and validate the Systems Architecture Service data?

<--- Score

14. How do you verify the Systems Architecture Service requirements quality?

<--- Score

15. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

<--- Score

16. Are the Systems Architecture Service benefits worth its costs?

<--- Score

17. Which measures and indicators matter?

<--- Score

18. At what cost?

<--- Score

19. What does verifying compliance entail?

<--- Score

20. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

<--- Score

21. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

<--- Score

22. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Systems Architecture Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

<--- Score

23. What is your Systems Architecture Service quality cost segregation study?

<--- Score

24. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

<--- Score

25. How frequently do you track Systems Architecture Service measures?

<--- Score

26. How will effects be measured?

<--- Score

27. Does the Systems Architecture Service task fit the client’s priorities?

<--- Score

28. What tests verify requirements?

<--- Score

29. Are the measurements objective?

<--- Score

30. What is the cost of rework?

<--- Score

31. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

<--- Score

32. How frequently do you verify your Systems Architecture Service strategy?

<--- Score

33. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

<--- Score

34. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

<--- Score

35. How will success or failure be measured?

<--- Score

36. What could cause delays in the schedule?

<--- Score

37. What are the Systems Architecture Service key cost drivers?

<--- Score

38. What are the Systems Architecture Service investment costs?

<--- Score

39. What harm might be caused?

<--- Score

40. What are hidden Systems Architecture Service quality costs?

<--- Score

41. What could cause you to change course?

<--- Score

42. What can be used to verify compliance?

<--- Score

43. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

<--- Score

44. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

<--- Score

45. Why a Systems Architecture Service focus?

<--- Score

46. Are there competing Systems Architecture Service priorities?

<--- Score

47. What would it cost to replace your technology?

<--- Score

48. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

<--- Score

49. Are there measurements based on task performance?

<--- Score

50. What causes extra work or rework?

<--- Score

51. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

<--- Score

52. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

<--- Score

53. What are the costs of reform?

<--- Score

54. Are the units of measure consistent?

<--- Score

55. What is measured? Why?

<--- Score

56. Have you included everything in your Systems Architecture Service cost models?

<--- Score

57. How do you measure success?

<--- Score

58. What do you measure and why?

<--- Score

59. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

<--- Score

60. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

<--- Score

61. Are indirect costs charged to the Systems Architecture Service program?

<--- Score

62. How are measurements made?

<--- Score

63. Do you have any cost Systems Architecture Service limitation requirements?

<--- Score

64. What is the total fixed cost?

<--- Score

65. How are you verifying it?

<--- Score

66. What does losing customers cost your organization?

<--- Score

67. What drives O&M cost?

<--- Score

68. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

<--- Score

69. How can you measure Systems Architecture Service in a systematic way?

<--- Score

70. What are your key Systems Architecture Service organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

<--- Score

71. What does your operating model cost?

<--- Score

72. What are the types and number of measures to use?

<--- Score

73. How much does it cost?

<--- Score

74. How will your organization measure success?

<--- Score

75. When are costs are incurred?

<--- Score

76. Which Systems Architecture Service impacts are significant?

<--- Score

77. Where is the cost?

<--- Score

78. What are the costs?

<--- Score

79. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

<--- Score

80. Among the Systems Architecture Service product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

<--- Score

81. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?

<--- Score

82. What is the total cost related to deploying Systems Architecture Service, including any consulting or professional services?

<--- Score

83. Where can you go to verify the info?

<--- Score

84. Which costs should be taken into account?

<--- Score

85. Will Systems Architecture Service have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

<--- Score

86. How do your measurements capture actionable Systems Architecture Service information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

<--- Score

87. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

<--- Score

88. What is your decision requirements diagram?

<--- Score

89. How will you measure your Systems Architecture Service effectiveness?

<--- Score

90. What causes mismanagement?

<--- Score

91. How do you measure variability?

<--- Score

92. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

<--- Score

93. How do you verify performance?

<--- Score

94. How is the value delivered by Systems Architecture Service being measured?

<--- Score

95. The approach of traditional Systems Architecture Service works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

<--- Score

96. How do you measure lifecycle phases?

<--- Score

97. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

<--- Score

98. How will you measure success?

<--- Score

99. How can you manage cost down?

<--- Score

100. What relevant entities could be measured?

<--- Score

101. How to cause the change?

<--- Score

102. How do you measure efficient delivery of Systems Architecture Service services?

<--- Score

103. How is progress measured?

<--- Score

104. Are missed Systems Architecture Service opportunities costing your organization money?

<--- Score

105. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

<--- Score

106. What are allowable costs?

<--- Score

107. What measurements are being captured?

<--- Score

108. What are the current costs of the Systems Architecture Service process?

<--- Score

109. Who should receive measurement reports?

<--- Score

110. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

<--- Score

111. What potential environmental factors impact the Systems Architecture Service effort?

<--- Score

112. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

<--- Score

113. How can you measure the performance?

<--- Score

114. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?

<--- Score

115. How do you verify your resources?

<--- Score

116. What are the operational costs after Systems Architecture Service deployment?

<--- Score

117. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

<--- Score

118. How can you reduce costs?

<--- Score

119. What are your operating costs?

<--- Score

120. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

<--- Score

121. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

<--- Score

122. What are your customers expectations and measures?

<--- Score

123. What are you verifying?

<--- Score

124. What details are required of the Systems Architecture Service cost structure?

<--- Score

125. What is an unallowable cost?

<--- Score

Systems Architecture Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх