Читать книгу Message Queuing As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 7
ОглавлениеCRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you assess your Message Queuing as a Service workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
2. For your Message Queuing as a Service project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
3. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
4. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
5. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
6. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Message Queuing as a Service research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
7. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
8. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
9. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Message Queuing as a Service? In other words, what are the risks, if Message Queuing as a Service does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
10. What Message Queuing as a Service events should you attend?
<--- Score
11. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Message Queuing as a Service delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
12. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
13. What situation(s) led to this Message Queuing as a Service Self Assessment?
<--- Score
14. Who needs to know about Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
15. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
16. Is it needed?
<--- Score
17. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
18. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
19. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
20. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
21. What Message Queuing as a Service problem should be solved?
<--- Score
22. What would happen if Message Queuing as a Service weren’t done?
<--- Score
23. How are the Message Queuing as a Service’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
24. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
25. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
26. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
27. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
28. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
29. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
30. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
31. Have you identified your Message Queuing as a Service key performance indicators?
<--- Score
32. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
33. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
34. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
35. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
36. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
37. What Message Queuing as a Service coordination do you need?
<--- Score
38. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
39. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Message Queuing as a Service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
40. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
41. Which information does the Message Queuing as a Service business case need to include?
<--- Score
42. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
43. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
44. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
45. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
46. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
47. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
48. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
49. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
50. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
51. What vendors make products that address the Message Queuing as a Service needs?
<--- Score
52. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
53. Who should resolve the Message Queuing as a Service issues?
<--- Score
54. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
55. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
56. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
57. What are the Message Queuing as a Service resources needed?
<--- Score
58. Consider your own Message Queuing as a Service project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
59. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
60. Are there Message Queuing as a Service problems defined?
<--- Score
61. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
62. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Message Queuing as a Service project?
<--- Score
63. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
64. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
65. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
66. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
67. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
68. Do you recognize Message Queuing as a Service achievements?
<--- Score
69. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
70. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
71. Do you know what you need to know about Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
72. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
73. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
74. Does Message Queuing as a Service create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
75. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
76. How do you recognize an Message Queuing as a Service objection?
<--- Score
77. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Message Queuing as a Service will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
78. Does your organization need more Message Queuing as a Service education?
<--- Score
79. What are the expected benefits of Message Queuing as a Service to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
80. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
81. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
82. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
83. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
84. Are there recognized Message Queuing as a Service problems?
<--- Score
85. Think about the people you identified for your Message Queuing as a Service project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
86. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
87. What information do users need?
<--- Score
88. What does Message Queuing as a Service success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
89. What are your needs in relation to Message Queuing as a Service skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
90. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Message Queuing as a Service leader?
<--- Score
91. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
92. What is the extent or complexity of the Message Queuing as a Service problem?
<--- Score
93. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
94. Do you need to avoid or amend any Message Queuing as a Service activities?
<--- Score
95. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Message Queuing as a Service team, Message Queuing as a Service itself?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Message Queuing as a Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
