Читать книгу Message Queuing As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
2. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
3. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
4. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
5. Among the Message Queuing as a Service product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
6. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
7. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
8. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
9. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
10. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
11. What details are required of the Message Queuing as a Service cost structure?
<--- Score
12. How do you verify the Message Queuing as a Service requirements quality?
<--- Score
13. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
14. What are the costs?
<--- Score
15. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
16. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
17. What are the Message Queuing as a Service investment costs?
<--- Score
18. Do you have any cost Message Queuing as a Service limitation requirements?
<--- Score
19. What are the Message Queuing as a Service key cost drivers?
<--- Score
20. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
21. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
22. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
23. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
24. How do you measure efficient delivery of Message Queuing as a Service services?
<--- Score
25. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
26. Which Message Queuing as a Service impacts are significant?
<--- Score
27. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
28. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
29. Are the Message Queuing as a Service benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
30. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
31. Are indirect costs charged to the Message Queuing as a Service program?
<--- Score
32. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
33. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
34. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
35. How will you measure your Message Queuing as a Service effectiveness?
<--- Score
36. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
37. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
38. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
39. Does a Message Queuing as a Service quantification method exist?
<--- Score
40. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
41. How can a Message Queuing as a Service test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
42. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
43. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
44. What is the total cost related to deploying Message Queuing as a Service, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
45. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
46. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
47. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
48. How can you measure Message Queuing as a Service in a systematic way?
<--- Score
49. How sensitive must the Message Queuing as a Service strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
50. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
51. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
52. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
53. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Message Queuing as a Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
54. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
55. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
56. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
57. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
58. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
59. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
60. What are the current costs of the Message Queuing as a Service process?
<--- Score
61. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
62. How do you verify Message Queuing as a Service completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
63. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
64. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
65. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
66. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
67. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
68. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
69. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
70. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
71. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
72. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
73. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
74. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
75. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
76. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
77. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
78. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Message Queuing as a Service services/products?
<--- Score
79. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
80. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
81. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
82. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
83. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
84. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
85. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
86. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
87. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
88. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
89. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
90. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
91. What are hidden Message Queuing as a Service quality costs?
<--- Score
92. What are the costs of delaying Message Queuing as a Service action?
<--- Score
93. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
94. How frequently do you track Message Queuing as a Service measures?
<--- Score
95. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
96. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
97. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
98. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
99. What is your Message Queuing as a Service quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
100. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
101. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
102. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
103. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
104. Are there competing Message Queuing as a Service priorities?
<--- Score
105. What are your key Message Queuing as a Service organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
106. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
107. How do you verify and validate the Message Queuing as a Service data?
<--- Score
108. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
109. Are missed Message Queuing as a Service opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
110. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
111. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
112. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
113. How do your measurements capture actionable Message Queuing as a Service information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
114. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
115. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
116. Does the Message Queuing as a Service task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
117. What is the cause of any Message Queuing as a Service gaps?
<--- Score
118. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
119. Are Message Queuing as a Service vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
120. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
121. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
122. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
123. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
124. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
125. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
126. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
127. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
128. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
129. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
130. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
131. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
132. Have you included everything in your Message Queuing as a Service cost models?
<--- Score
133. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
