Читать книгу Risk And Safety Statement A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What would be the goal or target for a Risk and Safety Statement’s improvement team?
<--- Score
2. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
3. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
4. What is the scope of Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
5. Who is gathering Risk and Safety Statement information?
<--- Score
6. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
7. Do you have a Risk and Safety Statement success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
8. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
9. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
10. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk and Safety Statement changes?
<--- Score
11. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
12. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
13. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
14. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
15. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
16. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
17. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
18. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
19. Is the scope of Risk and Safety Statement defined?
<--- Score
20. What system do you use for gathering Risk and Safety Statement information?
<--- Score
21. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk and Safety Statement results?
<--- Score
22. What are the Risk and Safety Statement tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
23. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
24. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
25. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
26. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
27. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
28. Is there any additional Risk and Safety Statement definition of success?
<--- Score
29. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
31. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
32. Has the Risk and Safety Statement work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
33. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
34. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
35. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk and Safety Statement work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
36. How do you think the partners involved in Risk and Safety Statement would have defined success?
<--- Score
37. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
38. What is the scope?
<--- Score
39. What is in scope?
<--- Score
40. What are (control) requirements for Risk and Safety Statement Information?
<--- Score
41. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
42. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
43. Are improvement team members fully trained on Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
44. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
45. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
46. Is the Risk and Safety Statement scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
47. Is there a Risk and Safety Statement management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
48. When is/was the Risk and Safety Statement start date?
<--- Score
49. How do you hand over Risk and Safety Statement context?
<--- Score
50. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
51. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
52. Has a Risk and Safety Statement requirement not been met?
<--- Score
53. Will a Risk and Safety Statement production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
54. Will team members perform Risk and Safety Statement work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
55. Who are the Risk and Safety Statement improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
56. What gets examined?
<--- Score
57. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
58. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
59. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
60. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
61. Who approved the Risk and Safety Statement scope?
<--- Score
62. Is Risk and Safety Statement currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
63. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
64. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
65. What is the context?
<--- Score
66. Are the Risk and Safety Statement requirements testable?
<--- Score
67. How do you manage changes in Risk and Safety Statement requirements?
<--- Score
68. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
69. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
70. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
71. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
72. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
74. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
75. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk and Safety Statement activities?
<--- Score
76. Have all basic functions of Risk and Safety Statement been defined?
<--- Score
77. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
78. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
79. How will the Risk and Safety Statement team and the group measure complete success of Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope of the Risk and Safety Statement work?
<--- Score
81. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk and Safety Statement leverage and how?
<--- Score
82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
83. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
84. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
85. How do you manage unclear Risk and Safety Statement requirements?
<--- Score
86. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk and Safety Statement study?
<--- Score
87. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
88. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
89. How did the Risk and Safety Statement manager receive input to the development of a Risk and Safety Statement improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
90. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
91. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
92. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
93. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
94. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
95. Is there a clear Risk and Safety Statement case definition?
<--- Score
96. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
97. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk and Safety Statement results are met?
<--- Score
98. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
99. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
100. Will team members regularly document their Risk and Safety Statement work?
<--- Score
101. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
103. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
104. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
105. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk and Safety Statement? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
106. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk and Safety Statement brings?
<--- Score
107. Is special Risk and Safety Statement user knowledge required?
<--- Score
108. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
109. How does the Risk and Safety Statement manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
111. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
112. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk and Safety Statement goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
113. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
114. What are the core elements of the Risk and Safety Statement business case?
<--- Score
115. Is Risk and Safety Statement linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
116. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
118. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
119. What is the scope of the Risk and Safety Statement effort?
<--- Score
120. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
121. How would you define Risk and Safety Statement leadership?
<--- Score
122. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
123. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
124. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
125. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
126. How can the value of Risk and Safety Statement be defined?
<--- Score
127. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
128. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
129. How do you catch Risk and Safety Statement definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
130. What Risk and Safety Statement requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
131. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
132. Is Risk and Safety Statement required?
<--- Score
133. Do you all define Risk and Safety Statement in the same way?
<--- Score
134. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
135. Is the Risk and Safety Statement scope manageable?
<--- Score
136. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
137. What is the definition of Risk and Safety Statement excellence?
<--- Score
138. Why are you doing Risk and Safety Statement and what is the scope?
<--- Score
139. Are accountability and ownership for Risk and Safety Statement clearly defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Risk and Safety Statement Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
