Читать книгу Independent Risk Factors A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
2. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
3. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
4. How are consistent Independent risk factors definitions important?
<--- Score
5. Who are the Independent risk factors improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
6. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
7. What system do you use for gathering Independent risk factors information?
<--- Score
8. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
9. What are the Independent risk factors use cases?
<--- Score
10. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
11. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
12. How did the Independent risk factors manager receive input to the development of a Independent risk factors improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
13. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
14. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
15. Is Independent risk factors currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
16. What happens if Independent risk factors’s scope changes?
<--- Score
17. What are the record-keeping requirements of Independent risk factors activities?
<--- Score
18. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
19. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
20. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
21. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
22. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
23. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
24. Is the Independent risk factors scope manageable?
<--- Score
25. Is there any additional Independent risk factors definition of success?
<--- Score
26. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
27. How do you manage unclear Independent risk factors requirements?
<--- Score
28. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
29. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
30. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
31. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
32. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Independent risk factors brings?
<--- Score
33. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
35. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Independent risk factors? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
36. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
37. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
38. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
39. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Independent risk factors changes?
<--- Score
40. What is the scope of the Independent risk factors effort?
<--- Score
41. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
42. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
43. Who approved the Independent risk factors scope?
<--- Score
44. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
45. Is there a critical path to deliver Independent risk factors results?
<--- Score
46. What is in scope?
<--- Score
47. What are (control) requirements for Independent risk factors Information?
<--- Score
48. How can the value of Independent risk factors be defined?
<--- Score
49. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
50. Are the Independent risk factors requirements complete?
<--- Score
51. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
52. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
53. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
54. Is Independent risk factors required?
<--- Score
55. How does the Independent risk factors manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
56. Why are you doing Independent risk factors and what is the scope?
<--- Score
57. Is there a clear Independent risk factors case definition?
<--- Score
58. What are the Independent risk factors tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
59. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
60. Do you all define Independent risk factors in the same way?
<--- Score
61. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
62. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
63. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
64. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Independent risk factors work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
65. Are accountability and ownership for Independent risk factors clearly defined?
<--- Score
66. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
67. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
68. How would you define Independent risk factors leadership?
<--- Score
69. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
70. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
71. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
72. How do you think the partners involved in Independent risk factors would have defined success?
<--- Score
73. Is Independent risk factors linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
74. What sources do you use to gather information for a Independent risk factors study?
<--- Score
75. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
76. Do you have a Independent risk factors success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
77. Is the scope of Independent risk factors defined?
<--- Score
78. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
79. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
80. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
81. How do you manage changes in Independent risk factors requirements?
<--- Score
82. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
83. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
84. What is the context?
<--- Score
85. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
86. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Independent risk factors goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
87. What would be the goal or target for a Independent risk factors’s improvement team?
<--- Score
88. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
89. Is the Independent risk factors scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
90. Has a Independent risk factors requirement not been met?
<--- Score
91. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
92. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Independent risk factors leverage and how?
<--- Score
93. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
94. What gets examined?
<--- Score
95. What are the core elements of the Independent risk factors business case?
<--- Score
96. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
97. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
98. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
99. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
101. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
102. How do you gather Independent risk factors requirements?
<--- Score
103. Has the Independent risk factors work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
104. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Independent risk factors results are met?
<--- Score
105. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Independent risk factors?
<--- Score
106. How have you defined all Independent risk factors requirements first?
<--- Score
107. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
108. When is/was the Independent risk factors start date?
<--- Score
109. Will a Independent risk factors production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
110. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
111. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
112. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
113. What was the context?
<--- Score
114. How do you catch Independent risk factors definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
115. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
116. How do you hand over Independent risk factors context?
<--- Score
117. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
118. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
119. Who is gathering Independent risk factors information?
<--- Score
120. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
121. What is the scope?
<--- Score
122. What is the scope of Independent risk factors?
<--- Score
123. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
124. How will the Independent risk factors team and the group measure complete success of Independent risk factors?
<--- Score
125. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
126. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
127. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
128. What Independent risk factors services do you require?
<--- Score
129. Have all basic functions of Independent risk factors been defined?
<--- Score
130. What is the definition of Independent risk factors excellence?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Independent risk factors Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
