Читать книгу Emergency Planning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 7

CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE

INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Does Emergency planning create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

<--- Score

2. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?

<--- Score

3. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Emergency planning project?

<--- Score

4. How are you going to measure success?

<--- Score

5. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

<--- Score

6. Do you need to avoid or amend any Emergency planning activities?

<--- Score

7. What Emergency planning events should you attend?

<--- Score

8. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?

<--- Score

9. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Emergency planning leader?

<--- Score

10. How are training requirements identified?

<--- Score

11. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Emergency planning delivery, for example is new software needed?

<--- Score

12. Have you identified your Emergency planning key performance indicators?

<--- Score

13. Which information does the Emergency planning business case need to include?

<--- Score

14. What needs to stay?

<--- Score

15. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

<--- Score

16. What information do users need?

<--- Score

17. Why the need?

<--- Score

18. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Emergency planning team, Emergency planning itself?

<--- Score

19. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?

<--- Score

20. Whom do you really need or want to serve?

<--- Score

21. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?

<--- Score

22. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?

<--- Score

23. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?

<--- Score

24. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?

<--- Score

25. Do you recognize Emergency planning achievements?

<--- Score

26. Who needs to know about Emergency planning?

<--- Score

27. What situation(s) led to this Emergency planning Self Assessment?

<--- Score

28. Is the quality assurance team identified?

<--- Score

29. Who needs to know?

<--- Score

30. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?

<--- Score

31. How do you recognize an objection?

<--- Score

32. For your Emergency planning project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?

<--- Score

33. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?

<--- Score

34. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Emergency planning?

<--- Score

35. Is the need for organizational change recognized?

<--- Score

36. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Emergency planning will circumvent those obstacles?

<--- Score

37. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

<--- Score

38. What resources or support might you need?

<--- Score

39. Did you miss any major Emergency planning issues?

<--- Score

40. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

<--- Score

41. What is the extent or complexity of the Emergency planning problem?

<--- Score

42. Do you know what you need to know about Emergency planning?

<--- Score

43. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

<--- Score

44. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

<--- Score

45. When a Emergency planning manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?

<--- Score

46. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?

<--- Score

47. How are the Emergency planning’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

<--- Score

48. Why is this needed?

<--- Score

49. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

<--- Score

50. Are there Emergency planning problems defined?

<--- Score

51. What is the problem or issue?

<--- Score

52. What are the Emergency planning resources needed?

<--- Score

53. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

<--- Score

54. What does Emergency planning success mean to the stakeholders?

<--- Score

55. Which issues are too important to ignore?

<--- Score

56. What do employees need in the short term?

<--- Score

57. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Emergency planning? In other words, what are the risks, if Emergency planning does not deliver successfully?

<--- Score

58. Are there recognized Emergency planning problems?

<--- Score

59. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?

<--- Score

60. What Emergency planning problem should be solved?

<--- Score

61. Who needs budgets?

<--- Score

62. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

<--- Score

63. What are the expected benefits of Emergency planning to the stakeholder?

<--- Score

64. What extra resources will you need?

<--- Score

65. What creative shifts do you need to take?

<--- Score

66. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

<--- Score

67. What would happen if Emergency planning weren’t done?

<--- Score

68. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?

<--- Score

69. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Emergency planning as an effective investment?

<--- Score

70. How do you assess your Emergency planning workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

<--- Score

71. Will Emergency planning deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?

<--- Score

72. Is it needed?

<--- Score

73. What else needs to be measured?

<--- Score

74. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?

<--- Score

75. What are your needs in relation to Emergency planning skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

<--- Score

76. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?

<--- Score

77. Who should resolve the Emergency planning issues?

<--- Score

78. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?

<--- Score

79. Consider your own Emergency planning project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

<--- Score

80. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

<--- Score

81. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Emergency planning research related to market response and models?

<--- Score

82. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

<--- Score

83. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?

<--- Score

84. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Emergency planning?

<--- Score

85. What are the clients issues and concerns?

<--- Score

86. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

<--- Score

87. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?

<--- Score

88. Who needs what information?

<--- Score

89. What is the Emergency planning problem definition? What do you need to resolve?

<--- Score

90. What do you need to start doing?

<--- Score

91. What Emergency planning capabilities do you need?

<--- Score

92. What Emergency planning coordination do you need?

<--- Score

93. Think about the people you identified for your Emergency planning project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?

<--- Score

94. Which needs are not included or involved?

<--- Score

95. Does your organization need more Emergency planning education?

<--- Score

96. What activities does the governance board need to consider?

<--- Score

97. Do you need different information or graphics?

<--- Score

98. Will it solve real problems?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Emergency planning Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.