Читать книгу Automation Management A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the requirements for smart home applications?
<--- Score
2. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automation management activities?
<--- Score
3. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
4. Is Automation management required?
<--- Score
5. Is Automation management currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
6. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
7. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
8. What is the scope of the Automation management effort?
<--- Score
9. What are the Automation management tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
10. What system do you use for gathering Automation management information?
<--- Score
11. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
12. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
13. When is/was the Automation management start date?
<--- Score
14. Is special Automation management user knowledge required?
<--- Score
15. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
16. How do you gather Automation management requirements?
<--- Score
17. How does the Automation management manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage changes in Automation management requirements?
<--- Score
19. What are the specific audit requirements for compliance?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage unclear Automation management requirements?
<--- Score
21. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
22. Is the scope of Automation management defined?
<--- Score
23. How are consistent Automation management definitions important?
<--- Score
24. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Automation management goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
25. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
26. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
27. What are the core elements of the Automation management business case?
<--- Score
28. Is your organization subject to a legal requirement that test cases be demonstrable?
<--- Score
29. Have all basic functions of Automation management been defined?
<--- Score
30. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
31. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
32. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
33. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
34. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
35. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
36. What are the Automation management use cases?
<--- Score
37. Are improvement team members fully trained on Automation management?
<--- Score
38. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
39. How have you defined all Automation management requirements first?
<--- Score
40. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
41. What happens if Automation management’s scope changes?
<--- Score
42. What is in scope?
<--- Score
43. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
44. How do you catch Automation management definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
45. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
46. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
47. Is there a Automation management management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
48. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
49. Why are you doing Automation management and what is the scope?
<--- Score
50. What is the definition of Automation management excellence?
<--- Score
51. Is Automation management linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
52. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
53. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
54. Do you have a Automation management success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
55. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
56. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
57. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
58. How would you define Automation management leadership?
<--- Score
59. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
60. What Automation management services do you require?
<--- Score
61. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automation management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
62. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
63. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
65. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Automation management leverage and how?
<--- Score
66. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
67. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
68. Are the Automation management requirements testable?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of Automation management?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Automation management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
72. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
73. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
74. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
75. What gets examined?
<--- Score
76. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
77. Is the Automation management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
78. Will team members perform Automation management work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
79. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automation management?
<--- Score
80. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automation management results are met?
<--- Score
81. Has the Automation management work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
82. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
83. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
84. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
85. Is the Automation management scope manageable?
<--- Score
86. Is there a critical path to deliver Automation management results?
<--- Score
87. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
88. Do you all define Automation management in the same way?
<--- Score
89. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
90. What would be the goal or target for a Automation management’s improvement team?
<--- Score
91. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
92. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
93. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
94. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
95. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
96. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
97. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
98. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
99. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
100. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
101. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automation management brings?
<--- Score
102. Who approved the Automation management scope?
<--- Score
103. Who is gathering Automation management information?
<--- Score
104. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Automation management changes?
<--- Score
105. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
106. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
107. How do you hand over Automation management context?
<--- Score
108. How do you think the partners involved in Automation management would have defined success?
<--- Score
109. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
110. How did the Automation management manager receive input to the development of a Automation management improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
111. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
112. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
113. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
114. How will the Automation management team and the group measure complete success of Automation management?
<--- Score
115. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
116. How can the value of Automation management be defined?
<--- Score
117. Is there any additional Automation management definition of success?
<--- Score
118. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
119. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
120. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
121. What was the context?
<--- Score
122. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
123. Are the Automation management requirements complete?
<--- Score
124. What are (control) requirements for Automation management Information?
<--- Score
125. Will team members regularly document their Automation management work?
<--- Score
126. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
127. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
128. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
129. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
130. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
131. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
132. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
133. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
134. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
135. What Automation management requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
136. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
137. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automation management study?
<--- Score
138. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
139. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Automation management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Automation management Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
