Читать книгу Threat And Risk Assessment A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What Threat and risk assessment services do you require?
<--- Score
2. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
3. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
4. What is the scope of the Threat and risk assessment effort?
<--- Score
5. What was the context?
<--- Score
6. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
7. When is/was the Threat and risk assessment start date?
<--- Score
8. Is the Threat and risk assessment scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
9. What are (control) requirements for Threat and risk assessment Information?
<--- Score
10. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
11. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
12. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
13. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
14. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
15. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
16. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
17. How do you manage unclear Threat and risk assessment requirements?
<--- Score
18. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
19. What sources do you use to gather information for a Threat and risk assessment study?
<--- Score
20. Is there any additional Threat and risk assessment definition of success?
<--- Score
21. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
22. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
23. Who is gathering Threat and risk assessment information?
<--- Score
24. How do you manage changes in Threat and risk assessment requirements?
<--- Score
25. Is special Threat and risk assessment user knowledge required?
<--- Score
26. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
27. Are the Threat and risk assessment requirements complete?
<--- Score
28. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
29. What happens if Threat and risk assessment’s scope changes?
<--- Score
30. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
31. What are the Threat and risk assessment tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
32. What is the context?
<--- Score
33. Is there a Threat and risk assessment management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
34. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
35. What are the core elements of the Threat and risk assessment business case?
<--- Score
36. Are the Threat and risk assessment requirements testable?
<--- Score
37. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
38. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
39. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
40. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Threat and risk assessment? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
41. Is Threat and risk assessment linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
42. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
43. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Threat and risk assessment changes?
<--- Score
44. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
45. What Threat and risk assessment requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
46. How are consistent Threat and risk assessment definitions important?
<--- Score
47. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
48. What are the Threat and risk assessment use cases?
<--- Score
49. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
50. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
51. Is there a clear Threat and risk assessment case definition?
<--- Score
52. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
53. Why are you doing Threat and risk assessment and what is the scope?
<--- Score
54. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
55. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
56. What would be the goal or target for a Threat and risk assessment’s improvement team?
<--- Score
57. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Threat and risk assessment goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
58. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
59. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
60. Is there a critical path to deliver Threat and risk assessment results?
<--- Score
61. Is Threat and risk assessment required?
<--- Score
62. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
63. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
64. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
65. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
66. How do you gather Threat and risk assessment requirements?
<--- Score
67. How did the Threat and risk assessment manager receive input to the development of a Threat and risk assessment improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
68. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
69. How does the Threat and risk assessment manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
70. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
71. How have you defined all Threat and risk assessment requirements first?
<--- Score
72. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
73. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Threat and risk assessment brings?
<--- Score
74. How will the Threat and risk assessment team and the group measure complete success of Threat and risk assessment?
<--- Score
75. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
76. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Threat and risk assessment work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
77. What are the record-keeping requirements of Threat and risk assessment activities?
<--- Score
78. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Threat and risk assessment results are met?
<--- Score
79. How can the value of Threat and risk assessment be defined?
<--- Score
80. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
81. What is the scope of the Threat and risk assessment work?
<--- Score
82. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
83. What system do you use for gathering Threat and risk assessment information?
<--- Score
84. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
85. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
86. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
87. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
88. What is the scope of Threat and risk assessment?
<--- Score
89. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
90. Is Threat and risk assessment currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
91. What is the definition of Threat and risk assessment excellence?
<--- Score
92. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
93. What is in scope?
<--- Score
94. How do you think the partners involved in Threat and risk assessment would have defined success?
<--- Score
95. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Threat and risk assessment leverage and how?
<--- Score
96. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
97. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
98. How do you hand over Threat and risk assessment context?
<--- Score
99. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
100. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
101. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
102. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
103. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
104. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
105. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
106. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
107. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
108. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
109. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
110. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
111. Do you all define Threat and risk assessment in the same way?
<--- Score
112. Will a Threat and risk assessment production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
113. How do you catch Threat and risk assessment definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
114. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
115. Is the Threat and risk assessment scope manageable?
<--- Score
116. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
117. Has the Threat and risk assessment work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
118. Have all basic functions of Threat and risk assessment been defined?
<--- Score
119. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
120. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
121. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
122. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
123. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
124. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
125. Do you have a Threat and risk assessment success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
126. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
127. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
128. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
129. Who are the Threat and risk assessment improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
130. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Threat and risk assessment?
<--- Score
131. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
132. Are accountability and ownership for Threat and risk assessment clearly defined?
<--- Score
133. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Threat and risk assessment Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
