Читать книгу Technical Reference Model A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there competing Technical Reference Model priorities?
<--- Score
2. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
3. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
4. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
5. At what cost?
<--- Score
6. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
7. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
8. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
9. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
10. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
11. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
12. Are the Technical Reference Model benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
13. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
14. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
15. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
16. Will Technical Reference Model have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
17. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
18. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
19. What are the current costs of the Technical Reference Model process?
<--- Score
20. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
21. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
22. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
23. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
24. How do your measurements capture actionable Technical Reference Model information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
25. Why a Technical Reference Model focus?
<--- Score
26. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
27. Is a follow-up focused external Technical Reference Model review required?
<--- Score
28. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
29. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
30. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
31. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
32. What details are required of the Technical Reference Model cost structure?
<--- Score
33. Does a Technical Reference Model quantification method exist?
<--- Score
34. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
35. What are your key Technical Reference Model organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
36. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
37. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
38. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
39. How will you measure your Technical Reference Model effectiveness?
<--- Score
40. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
41. The approach of traditional Technical Reference Model works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
42. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
43. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Technical Reference Model? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
44. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
45. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
46. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
47. Do you have any cost Technical Reference Model limitation requirements?
<--- Score
48. How can you measure Technical Reference Model in a systematic way?
<--- Score
49. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
50. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
51. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
52. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
53. How can a Technical Reference Model test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
54. What are the operational costs after Technical Reference Model deployment?
<--- Score
55. What are the costs of delaying Technical Reference Model action?
<--- Score
56. Are missed Technical Reference Model opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
57. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
58. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
59. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
60. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
61. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
62. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
63. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
64. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
65. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
66. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
67. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
68. What is the Technical Reference Model business impact?
<--- Score
69. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
70. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
71. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
72. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Technical Reference Model results?
<--- Score
73. How frequently do you track Technical Reference Model measures?
<--- Score
74. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
75. How sensitive must the Technical Reference Model strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
76. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
77. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
78. Among the Technical Reference Model product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
79. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
80. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
81. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
82. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
83. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
84. How do you verify if Technical Reference Model is built right?
<--- Score
85. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
86. How do you verify the Technical Reference Model requirements quality?
<--- Score
87. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
88. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
89. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
90. What are the Technical Reference Model investment costs?
<--- Score
91. How do you measure efficient delivery of Technical Reference Model services?
<--- Score
92. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
93. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
94. What are hidden Technical Reference Model quality costs?
<--- Score
95. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
96. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
97. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
98. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
99. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Technical Reference Model services/products?
<--- Score
100. How do you verify Technical Reference Model completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
101. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
102. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
103. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
104. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
105. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
106. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
107. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
108. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
109. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
110. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
111. What are the costs?
<--- Score
112. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
113. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
114. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
115. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
116. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
117. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
118. What are the Technical Reference Model key cost drivers?
<--- Score
119. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
120. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
121. How do you verify and validate the Technical Reference Model data?
<--- Score
122. Are indirect costs charged to the Technical Reference Model program?
<--- Score
123. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
124. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
125. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
126. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
127. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
128. Is the cost worth the Technical Reference Model effort ?
<--- Score
129. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
130. How is the value delivered by Technical Reference Model being measured?
<--- Score
131. What is the total cost related to deploying Technical Reference Model, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
132. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
133. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
134. What is your Technical Reference Model quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
