Читать книгу Identity In Organizational Communication A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

Оглавление

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

2. Has a Identity In Organizational Communication requirement not been met?

<--- Score

3. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

4. What is the context?

<--- Score

5. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

6. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<--- Score

7. Who is gathering information?

<--- Score

8. Is the Identity In Organizational Communication scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

9. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

10. How do you gather Identity In Organizational Communication requirements?

<--- Score

11. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<--- Score

12. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

13. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

14. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<--- Score

15. How do you manage scope?

<--- Score

16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

17. What information should you gather?

<--- Score

18. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<--- Score

19. Is there any additional Identity In Organizational Communication definition of success?

<--- Score

20. Are accountability and ownership for Identity In Organizational Communication clearly defined?

<--- Score

21. How do you think the partners involved in Identity In Organizational Communication would have defined success?

<--- Score

22. What is the definition of Identity In Organizational Communication excellence?

<--- Score

23. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

24. Where can you gather more information?

<--- Score

25. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<--- Score

26. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

27. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Identity In Organizational Communication?

<--- Score

28. How can the value of Identity In Organizational Communication be defined?

<--- Score

29. What are the core elements of the Identity In Organizational Communication business case?

<--- Score

30. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

31. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Identity In Organizational Communication? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

32. What gets examined?

<--- Score

33. How do you gather requirements?

<--- Score

34. What intelligence can you gather?

<--- Score

35. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

36. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<--- Score

37. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Identity In Organizational Communication goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

39. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

40. What would be the goal or target for a Identity In Organizational Communication’s improvement team?

<--- Score

41. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<--- Score

42. Scope of sensitive information?

<--- Score

43. How would you define Identity In Organizational Communication leadership?

<--- Score

44. Is Identity In Organizational Communication currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

45. What sort of initial information to gather?

<--- Score

46. Has your scope been defined?

<--- Score

47. What is out of scope?

<--- Score

48. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

49. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

50. Is there a critical path to deliver Identity In Organizational Communication results?

<--- Score

51. Are all requirements met?

<--- Score

52. How do you catch Identity In Organizational Communication definition inconsistencies?

<--- Score

53. Why are you doing Identity In Organizational Communication and what is the scope?

<--- Score

54. Is there a clear Identity In Organizational Communication case definition?

<--- Score

55. What is out-of-scope initially?

<--- Score

56. What are the tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

57. Is Identity In Organizational Communication required?

<--- Score

58. What happens if Identity In Organizational Communication’s scope changes?

<--- Score

59. What is the definition of success?

<--- Score

60. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Identity In Organizational Communication results are met?

<--- Score

61. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Identity In Organizational Communication leverage and how?

<--- Score

62. What are the requirements for audit information?

<--- Score

63. What are (control) requirements for Identity In Organizational Communication Information?

<--- Score

64. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<--- Score

65. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

66. What is the scope of the Identity In Organizational Communication effort?

<--- Score

67. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Identity In Organizational Communication work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

68. How do you gather the stories?

<--- Score

69. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<--- Score

70. What is the scope of Identity In Organizational Communication?

<--- Score

71. How do you manage unclear Identity In Organizational Communication requirements?

<--- Score

72. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

73. How have you defined all Identity In Organizational Communication requirements first?

<--- Score

74. What knowledge or experience is required?

<--- Score

75. How do you build the right business case?

<--- Score

76. Is there a Identity In Organizational Communication management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

<--- Score

77. How do you manage changes in Identity In Organizational Communication requirements?

<--- Score

78. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<--- Score

79. Does the scope remain the same?

<--- Score

80. Are the Identity In Organizational Communication requirements testable?

<--- Score

81. How does the Identity In Organizational Communication manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

82. How do you hand over Identity In Organizational Communication context?

<--- Score

83. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

84. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

85. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Identity In Organizational Communication changes?

<--- Score

86. Is the scope of Identity In Organizational Communication defined?

<--- Score

87. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

88. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Identity In Organizational Communication brings?

<--- Score

89. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

90. Who approved the Identity In Organizational Communication scope?

<--- Score

91. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

92. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

93. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

94. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<--- Score

95. Are the Identity In Organizational Communication requirements complete?

<--- Score

96. How did the Identity In Organizational Communication manager receive input to the development of a Identity In Organizational Communication improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

97. Is the Identity In Organizational Communication scope manageable?

<--- Score

98. Who are the Identity In Organizational Communication improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

99. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<--- Score

100. What system do you use for gathering Identity In Organizational Communication information?

<--- Score

101. What is the worst case scenario?

<--- Score

102. What information do you gather?

<--- Score

103. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<--- Score

104. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

<--- Score

105. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

106. What Identity In Organizational Communication services do you require?

<--- Score

107. Have all basic functions of Identity In Organizational Communication been defined?

<--- Score

108. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<--- Score

109. Do you all define Identity In Organizational Communication in the same way?

<--- Score

110. Do you have a Identity In Organizational Communication success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

111. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<--- Score

112. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

113. Who is gathering Identity In Organizational Communication information?

<--- Score

114. The political context: who holds power?

<--- Score

115. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

116. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

117. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

118. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

119. What are the Identity In Organizational Communication use cases?

<--- Score

120. Is special Identity In Organizational Communication user knowledge required?

<--- Score

121. How will the Identity In Organizational Communication team and the group measure complete success of Identity In Organizational Communication?

<--- Score

122. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<--- Score

123. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

124. What are the record-keeping requirements of Identity In Organizational Communication activities?

<--- Score

125. What was the context?

<--- Score

126. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

127. What is in scope?

<--- Score

128. What sources do you use to gather information for a Identity In Organizational Communication study?

<--- Score

129. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

130. Is Identity In Organizational Communication linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

131. Has the Identity In Organizational Communication work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

132. Will a Identity In Organizational Communication production readiness review be required?

<--- Score

133. How are consistent Identity In Organizational Communication definitions important?

<--- Score

134. When is/was the Identity In Organizational Communication start date?

<--- Score

135. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Identity In Organizational Communication Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Identity In Organizational Communication A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх