Читать книгу Wireless Local Area Network A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Will a Wireless local area network production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
2. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
3. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
4. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
5. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
6. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
7. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Wireless local area network goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
8. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
9. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
10. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
11. What is the scope of the Wireless local area network effort?
<--- Score
12. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
13. When is/was the Wireless local area network start date?
<--- Score
14. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
15. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
16. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
17. What is the scope of the Wireless local area network work?
<--- Score
18. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
19. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
20. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Wireless local area network changes?
<--- Score
21. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
22. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Wireless local area network brings?
<--- Score
23. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
24. What are (control) requirements for Wireless local area network Information?
<--- Score
25. How have you defined all Wireless local area network requirements first?
<--- Score
26. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
27. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
28. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
29. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Wireless local area network leverage and how?
<--- Score
30. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
31. Is there a Wireless local area network management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
32. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
33. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
34. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
35. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
36. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
37. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
38. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
39. What are the Wireless local area network use cases?
<--- Score
40. Is the Wireless local area network scope manageable?
<--- Score
41. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
42. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
43. Do you all define Wireless local area network in the same way?
<--- Score
44. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
45. Will team members perform Wireless local area network work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
46. Are the Wireless local area network requirements complete?
<--- Score
47. Who approved the Wireless local area network scope?
<--- Score
48. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
49. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
50. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
51. Is special Wireless local area network user knowledge required?
<--- Score
52. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
53. What system do you use for gathering Wireless local area network information?
<--- Score
54. Are accountability and ownership for Wireless local area network clearly defined?
<--- Score
55. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
56. What sources do you use to gather information for a Wireless local area network study?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather Wireless local area network requirements?
<--- Score
58. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
59. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
60. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
61. Are improvement team members fully trained on Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
62. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
63. How do you hand over Wireless local area network context?
<--- Score
64. How does the Wireless local area network manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
65. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
66. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
67. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
68. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
70. Is the Wireless local area network scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
71. Who is gathering Wireless local area network information?
<--- Score
72. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
73. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
74. Will team members regularly document their Wireless local area network work?
<--- Score
75. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
76. Is there a critical path to deliver Wireless local area network results?
<--- Score
77. What Wireless local area network services do you require?
<--- Score
78. Is Wireless local area network currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
79. What is the definition of Wireless local area network excellence?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope?
<--- Score
81. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
82. What are the Wireless local area network tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
83. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
85. What would be the goal or target for a Wireless local area network’s improvement team?
<--- Score
86. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
87. What is the context?
<--- Score
88. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
89. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
90. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
91. Has the Wireless local area network work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
92. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
93. Is Wireless local area network linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
94. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
95. Are the Wireless local area network requirements testable?
<--- Score
96. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Wireless local area network? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
97. Have all basic functions of Wireless local area network been defined?
<--- Score
98. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
99. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
100. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
101. Is Wireless local area network required?
<--- Score
102. Who are the Wireless local area network improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
103. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
104. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
105. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
106. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Wireless local area network work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
107. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
108. How do you manage changes in Wireless local area network requirements?
<--- Score
109. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
110. Is the scope of Wireless local area network defined?
<--- Score
111. Has a Wireless local area network requirement not been met?
<--- Score
112. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
113. Is there a clear Wireless local area network case definition?
<--- Score
114. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
115. What is in scope?
<--- Score
116. How will the Wireless local area network team and the group measure complete success of Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
117. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
118. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
119. How can the value of Wireless local area network be defined?
<--- Score
120. What happens if Wireless local area network’s scope changes?
<--- Score
121. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Wireless local area network results are met?
<--- Score
122. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
123. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
124. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
125. How are consistent Wireless local area network definitions important?
<--- Score
126. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
127. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
128. What are the core elements of the Wireless local area network business case?
<--- Score
129. How did the Wireless local area network manager receive input to the development of a Wireless local area network improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
130. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
131. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
132. What was the context?
<--- Score
133. Why are you doing Wireless local area network and what is the scope?
<--- Score
134. How do you manage unclear Wireless local area network requirements?
<--- Score
135. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
136. What gets examined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Wireless local area network Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
