Читать книгу Analytical Tool A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
2. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
3. How did the Analytical tool manager receive input to the development of a Analytical tool improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
4. Is there any additional Analytical tool definition of success?
<--- Score
5. Are improvement team members fully trained on Analytical tool?
<--- Score
6. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
7. How do you think the partners involved in Analytical tool would have defined success?
<--- Score
8. Will team members regularly document their Analytical tool work?
<--- Score
9. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
10. Is there a Analytical tool management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
11. What is the scope of the Analytical tool work?
<--- Score
12. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
13. How do you gather Analytical tool requirements?
<--- Score
14. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
15. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
16. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
17. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
18. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
19. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
20. Do you all define Analytical tool in the same way?
<--- Score
21. Has the Analytical tool work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
22. Is special Analytical tool user knowledge required?
<--- Score
23. Why are you doing Analytical tool and what is the scope?
<--- Score
24. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
25. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
26. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
27. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
28. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
29. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
30. Is Analytical tool required?
<--- Score
31. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
32. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
33. What sources do you use to gather information for a Analytical tool study?
<--- Score
34. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
35. When is/was the Analytical tool start date?
<--- Score
36. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
37. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
38. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
39. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
40. Are the Analytical tool requirements complete?
<--- Score
41. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
42. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
43. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
44. Is the Analytical tool scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
45. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
46. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
47. What is the context?
<--- Score
48. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
49. How will the Analytical tool team and the group measure complete success of Analytical tool?
<--- Score
50. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
51. What is the definition of Analytical tool excellence?
<--- Score
52. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
53. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
54. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Analytical tool results are met?
<--- Score
55. How do you catch Analytical tool definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
56. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
57. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
58. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
59. Has a Analytical tool requirement not been met?
<--- Score
60. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
61. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
62. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
63. What is in scope?
<--- Score
64. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
65. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
66. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
67. Will team members perform Analytical tool work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
68. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
69. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Analytical tool improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. Will a Analytical tool production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
72. What Analytical tool requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
73. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
74. How does the Analytical tool manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
75. How do you hand over Analytical tool context?
<--- Score
76. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
77. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
78. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
79. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
80. Is Analytical tool currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
81. Are the Analytical tool requirements testable?
<--- Score
82. Have all basic functions of Analytical tool been defined?
<--- Score
83. Do you have a Analytical tool success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
84. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Analytical tool work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
85. Is the scope of Analytical tool defined?
<--- Score
86. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
87. What is the scope of Analytical tool?
<--- Score
88. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
89. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
90. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
91. Is there a critical path to deliver Analytical tool results?
<--- Score
92. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
93. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
94. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
95. What gets examined?
<--- Score
96. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
97. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Analytical tool? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
99. How can the value of Analytical tool be defined?
<--- Score
100. What are (control) requirements for Analytical tool Information?
<--- Score
101. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
102. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
103. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Analytical tool brings?
<--- Score
104. What would be the goal or target for a Analytical tool’s improvement team?
<--- Score
105. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Analytical tool leverage and how?
<--- Score
106. What Analytical tool services do you require?
<--- Score
107. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
108. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
109. Is the Analytical tool scope manageable?
<--- Score
110. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Analytical tool?
<--- Score
111. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
112. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
113. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Analytical tool goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
114. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
115. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
116. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
117. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
118. What are the core elements of the Analytical tool business case?
<--- Score
119. What are the record-keeping requirements of Analytical tool activities?
<--- Score
120. What happens if Analytical tool’s scope changes?
<--- Score
121. Who approved the Analytical tool scope?
<--- Score
122. What are the Analytical tool use cases?
<--- Score
123. Is Analytical tool linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
124. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
125. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
126. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
127. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
128. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
129. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Analytical tool improvements?
<--- Score
130. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Analytical tool Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
