Читать книгу Secure Terminal Equipment A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How can the value of Secure Terminal Equipment be defined?
<--- Score
2. What was the context?
<--- Score
3. Are the Secure Terminal Equipment requirements testable?
<--- Score
4. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Secure Terminal Equipment leverage and how?
<--- Score
5. Will a Secure Terminal Equipment production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
6. How have you defined all Secure Terminal Equipment requirements first?
<--- Score
7. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
8. What are the Secure Terminal Equipment tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
9. What is the scope of the Secure Terminal Equipment work?
<--- Score
10. Has the Secure Terminal Equipment work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
11. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
12. When is/was the Secure Terminal Equipment start date?
<--- Score
13. Is the scope of Secure Terminal Equipment defined?
<--- Score
14. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
15. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
16. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Secure Terminal Equipment brings?
<--- Score
17. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
18. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
19. How does the Secure Terminal Equipment manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
20. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
21. Is there a Secure Terminal Equipment management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
22. Is the Secure Terminal Equipment scope manageable?
<--- Score
23. Have all basic functions of Secure Terminal Equipment been defined?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
25. How do you manage changes in Secure Terminal Equipment requirements?
<--- Score
26. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
27. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
28. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
29. How did the Secure Terminal Equipment manager receive input to the development of a Secure Terminal Equipment improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
30. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Secure Terminal Equipment work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
31. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
32. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
33. What are the record-keeping requirements of Secure Terminal Equipment activities?
<--- Score
34. What is the scope of Secure Terminal Equipment?
<--- Score
35. How are consistent Secure Terminal Equipment definitions important?
<--- Score
36. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
37. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
38. Who is gathering Secure Terminal Equipment information?
<--- Score
39. What would be the goal or target for a Secure Terminal Equipment’s improvement team?
<--- Score
40. What is the context?
<--- Score
41. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
42. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
43. What happens if Secure Terminal Equipment’s scope changes?
<--- Score
44. Are accountability and ownership for Secure Terminal Equipment clearly defined?
<--- Score
45. Is there a critical path to deliver Secure Terminal Equipment results?
<--- Score
46. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
47. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
48. Do you have a Secure Terminal Equipment success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
49. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
50. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
51. Is there a clear Secure Terminal Equipment case definition?
<--- Score
52. Is Secure Terminal Equipment linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
53. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Secure Terminal Equipment changes?
<--- Score
54. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
55. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
56. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
57. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
58. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
59. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
60. How do you gather Secure Terminal Equipment requirements?
<--- Score
61. Is the Secure Terminal Equipment scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
62. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
63. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
64. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
65. How do you catch Secure Terminal Equipment definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
66. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
67. What is in scope?
<--- Score
68. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
69. Is special Secure Terminal Equipment user knowledge required?
<--- Score
70. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
71. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
72. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
73. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
74. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
75. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
76. What sources do you use to gather information for a Secure Terminal Equipment study?
<--- Score
77. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
78. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
79. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
80. What is the definition of Secure Terminal Equipment excellence?
<--- Score
81. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
82. Is Secure Terminal Equipment currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
83. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
84. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
85. How do you think the partners involved in Secure Terminal Equipment would have defined success?
<--- Score
86. Is Secure Terminal Equipment required?
<--- Score
87. Do you all define Secure Terminal Equipment in the same way?
<--- Score
88. Who are the Secure Terminal Equipment improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
89. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
90. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
91. What system do you use for gathering Secure Terminal Equipment information?
<--- Score
92. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
93. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
94. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
95. How do you manage unclear Secure Terminal Equipment requirements?
<--- Score
96. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
97. What is the scope of the Secure Terminal Equipment effort?
<--- Score
98. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
99. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
100. What is the scope?
<--- Score
101. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
102. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
103. Will team members regularly document their Secure Terminal Equipment work?
<--- Score
104. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
105. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
106. Has a Secure Terminal Equipment requirement not been met?
<--- Score
107. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
108. What are the Secure Terminal Equipment use cases?
<--- Score
109. What gets examined?
<--- Score
110. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Secure Terminal Equipment goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
111. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
112. What Secure Terminal Equipment services do you require?
<--- Score
113. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
114. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Secure Terminal Equipment? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
115. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
116. What are (control) requirements for Secure Terminal Equipment Information?
<--- Score
117. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
118. Is there any additional Secure Terminal Equipment definition of success?
<--- Score
119. Why are you doing Secure Terminal Equipment and what is the scope?
<--- Score
120. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
121. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
122. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
123. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
124. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
125. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Secure Terminal Equipment?
<--- Score
126. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
127. How would you define Secure Terminal Equipment leadership?
<--- Score
128. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
129. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
130. Are the Secure Terminal Equipment requirements complete?
<--- Score
131. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
132. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
133. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
134. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
135. How will the Secure Terminal Equipment team and the group measure complete success of Secure Terminal Equipment?
<--- Score
136. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
137. What are the core elements of the Secure Terminal Equipment business case?
<--- Score
138. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
139. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
140. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Secure Terminal Equipment results are met?
<--- Score
141. Who approved the Secure Terminal Equipment scope?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Secure Terminal Equipment Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
